Jump to content

FrankRizzo

Members
  • Content Count

    1,027
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About FrankRizzo

  • Rank
    FF Geek
  1. FrankRizzo

    Tom Brady is not a top fantasy QB option.

    I focked up .... last week picked up VYoung just in case, but stuck with Brady ... mistake knocked me out of the SB contention. This week focked up again. Played VYoung instead of Brady ... and will probably knock me out of 3rd place money. FOCK!!! Can I ever get anything focking right???
  2. FrankRizzo

    Why Head to Head Formats are Terrible

    Exactly. Every year there is a team that probably should of been in the playoffs but found themselves on the outside looking in. But it happens in the NFL too. H2H is a blast ... especially when you know the other players. I wouldn't mind rewarding top scorer each week or something like that but so far nobody in the 12team league has complained or brought it up. We do split the pot 50/50 for regular season play and playoffs so Week 16 isn't for all the marbles (just 20% of it). Also, the teams that didn't make the playoffs (6 of them) play in the "losers" bracket in a total points format for the final 3 weeks, winner take all. Keeps everyone playing full 16 weeks.
  3. FrankRizzo

    Fantasy Football MVP

    Funny but the past three years I have won the Bowl it was with a player not drafted ... 2009: Jerome Harrison 2008: Antonio Bryant 2007: Aaron Stecker
  4. Seems like Romo always stinks in the beginning of games .. but then puts up 80% of his fantasy points in the 2nd half/4th quarter. At least that's what he was like past two years when I owned him. 17-10 Saints at half 34-24 Saints win
  5. 2nd round is going to be just as juicy ... CBenson JAddai TJones JCharles RGrant RMendenhall DJax RWhite MAustin MColston VJax/SRice Manning Rodgers
  6. Horrible analogy. Colts would rest starters to PREVENT INJURY, not effect the teams involved in the playoffs. So you would be okay tied with another team for the final playoff spot ... and the guy he is playing against decides to not play his team and give him the win (because of weaker opponent, closer buddy, whatever)???? No focking way. This is so unbelievably bad.
  7. FrankRizzo

    I face him this week, so I want him to suck, but...

    I agree ... very fun to watch. I own the NFL package and everytime I cross paths with a Tennessee game I pretty much stay on it during their offensive possession. Dude is a freak. Cuts, stops, dances .... and does all this while going cheetah speeds. Funny thing is he was on my DND list. Thought a slimmer and soberer White would challenge him for the goaline love and other carriers ... RBBC for sure. But I'm a believer now. This year I wanted TOP 2 for the draft (ADP/MJD) ... next year TOP 3 and add this cat to it.
  8. FrankRizzo

    Commishes please help me with wild card tie-breaker

    Good rules ... but why do they have to be so LOUD? Pretty sure we've beat it into this guy that his rules need to be changed. He needs help figuring out who's in/out based on their CURRENT CRAPPY RULES.
  9. Man, domestic dispute sounds about right for this headcase guy, but still. Very talented receiver with major credible hype coming out of the preseason .... so much so I drafted the dude. However I did drop him like a pickup truck.
  10. FrankRizzo

    Who is playing Colts WRs on Thursday

    You sit Collie but play Wayne, Clark and Peyton due to the team resting the studs? Is Collie the #1 Stud of this group??? I'm thinking all Colts are not worthy this week. These guys will be playing 2nd or 3rd quarter: QB Painter RB Simpson, Hart TE Santi WR Baskett is the only other receiver on the active roster ... so Garcon and/or Collie would have to continue playing right?? Have they activated WR Roy Hall? EDIT: Roy Hall is on the IR NFL.com roster for Indy only shows Wayne, Garcon, Collie, Gonzalez, Baskett and Hall as their WRs If that is accurate and they don't sign anybody, I would feel comfortable rolling with Garcon or Collie.
  11. FrankRizzo

    Commishes please help me with wild card tie-breaker

    Not sure if it's that simple though ... don't you have to eliminate when you have 3 or more clubs? A = 4-1 ( BBCC-D ) B = 2-3 ( CD-AAC ) C = 1-4 ( B-AABD) D = 2-1 ( AC-B ) C is out. Then do it again (take out C games)..... A = 2-1 ( BB-D ) B = 1-2 ( D-AA ) D = 1-1 ( A-B ) Take B out. Do it again (take B games out) ...... A = ( 0-1 ) D = ( 1-0 ) TEAM D WINS right? Again, I'm not 100% sure because we don't use this method but this is what I believe is correct.
  12. FrankRizzo

    Commishes please help me with wild card tie-breaker

    You need to read his last statement about being in the same division. Team A beat B and C TWO TIMES ... and B and C split 1-1 (ABC same division) Here is the breakdown H2H: A = 4-1 ( BBCC-D ) B = 2-3 ( CD-AAC ) C = 1-4 ( B-AABD) D = 2-1 ( AC-B )
  13. FrankRizzo

    Commishes please help me with wild card tie-breaker

    You are right .. I figured out what he meant with his last statement about Team A beating BC 2x .. and BC splitting. I edited my post ... TEAM D actually wins it. I really really hate the H2H as a tiebreaker, for so many reasons, I get fantasy leagues trying to mimic the NFL but fantasy teams are different than real NFL teams .. when an NFL team has a bye, the WHOLE team has a bye and is not effected .. but when a fantasy team has a bye (which they do over 6 weeks) it decimates teams along the way and to pick a certain game of H2H that was effected by bye weeks makes absolutely ZERO sense to me. IMO
  14. FrankRizzo

    Commishes please help me with wild card tie-breaker

    EDIT: A = 4-1 ( BBCC-D ) B = 2-3 ( CD-AAC ) C = 1-4 ( B-AABD) D = 2-1 ( AC-B ) Can you really use H2H when they don't play the same amount of games?? Not sure, we don't use this method. But either way C is out based on first tiebreaker (H2H) Then do it again (take out C games)..... A = 2-1 ( BB-D ) B = 1-2 ( D-AA ) D = 1-1 ( A-B ) Take B out. Do it again (take B games out) ...... A = ( 0-1 ) D = ( 1-0 ) TEAM D WINS!!!!
×