PriestAlone

F L Ron Hubbard, and F all those clones F all those LT owners without homes

There must be someone somewhere who lost because of that Rams botched extra point.

Will the new O-coordinator make any difference? I know nobody has a crystal ball. I was all set on Jennings then I read all this junk about a new coach and Randy being due for a big week. Well, he's been due for a big week since 2005. My entire playoff chances could hinge on this decision. I'm heading back to the toilet.

I think I'm about to pull the trigger. Huge upgrade at WR. Caddy will be my second RB, but Julius hasn't been exactly lighting it up. And my receivers blow - R. Moss, Jennings, Gabriel, Mason.

Would you take Caddy and Roy for JJ and Gabriel/Mason?

Thinking about trading for him. I know, I know. He sucks, but he is the featured back. Any chance he'll lose carries over the coming weeks? I haven't followed Tampa very closely this season.

We think alike. Which explains why I lost my a*s last week, too.

I think the point originally made is that Manning hasn't been that brilliant every game. Actually, not even close. This is not a knock on him in general, it just means he was out of his mind (even by his standards) against Denver. Some people are calling it the best game he's ever played (which also speaks to his postseason history). The Manning who led the Colts to 14 total points against the Titans is not the same Manning from this past Sunday, so to speak. Ditto Brady against the Broncos compared to Brady on Monday night. Guess I was just confused, as you predicted a score then said you wouldn't play the game if the line moved a point the wrong way, even though that had no bearing on your predicted score. I don't have a crystal ball either. I have a dwindling bank account. I like the Bears if it stays under two touchdowns, but I'll play it anyway.

What does the 3 1/2 have to do with the Packers winning by 3? They're a dog.

Actually, those are different Mannings. If it stays at 3 or goes up, I'll take the dog. I can't imagine this game not being extremely close.

This was my understanding as well. I was under the impression they were going to at least try to open it up. I'm not saying McNair or Mason will be worth a crap, but I definitely think they'll throw more. And with Jennings out, I'm having to start Mason this week.

Who said they have to win?

Compared to last week, these games look downright easy. Not to say I won't go 3-9. But last week made my stomach (and wallet) hurt. I'm telling everyone, bet the house on Tampa and St. Louis. No way both don't cover. Impossible.

Nobody doubts the D (isn't that obvious by now?), but you imply that Shannahan has been holding something back on offense. Really?

Have you seen the Denver offense? I think me and ten of my buddies could hold 'em under 21. They've gone under every game this season, including last week when their total was 31. They scored 13 against the Raiders. The more I think about this, the more I like Indy.