josh wiley

could there possibly be any sane justification for starting tony fisher over rudi johnson? im thnking fisher will be featured, while rudi will continue to split touches with chris perry.

that's it huh. no one thinks fisher can possibly outproduce rudi this week. im disappointed in you all. seems like a decent question.

for all the crap ive heard about how priest has been a bust of a draft pick, my team is 6-1 and cruising (knock on wood) to the playoffs. hes been consistent all year and unlike lt and shaun he has had productive numbers just about every week. so to all who have been bashing him on this forum, i just wanted to let u know this owner is fine with having him as my starter. on top of that i am glad lj has been spelling him to keep him fresh, and oh yeah consistent.

my point is he hasnt singlehandedly lost me a game yet. lt ran for like 5 yards with no tds against my eagles and im pretty sure shaun alexander had a dismal week after his huge week. even on the week priest ran 14 times for 18 yards, he caught 5 for 100 and a td.

according to the stat proj on this website i guess hes not even gonna suit up this week, although i tend to think stud already and only gonna get better.

is it possible that fisher could rack up the receptions as the starter for green bay, considering that is how they use him when they bring him in on third downs. a poor man's westbrook possibly. didnt cincinnati's rush def get shredded last week? im seriously considering starting him over rudi johnson, due to the fact that his rushes are down in the bengal offense. any thoughts?

i noticed that bledsoe seemed to be under heavy pressure against seattle. it got me thinking about the fact that someone on here had said that the loss of flozell adams would be huge. will this now be the drew that gets sacked five or six times a game, or was this an abberation? btw, terrible decision/play call on that last pass that was intercepted. cowboys basically gift wrapped it for seattle.