zac3434

Reason I hate this is it gives the 1 guy drafting for him knowledge that rest of league doesn't necessarily have.

omg, who woulda thought you didn't explain in first place.

What we could build in a league that we dont know the size of, we don't know who is/isn't kept, we dont know the scoring for. WTF good would the random we put down here be?

This makes no sense. You dont use any sort of website to handle your trades? And if you do, either have them process immediately when accepted, or after x amount of time passes for it to be voted on, which should be predetermined.

Threw a towel. No gloves were thrown.

Wrong board.

by ESPN? this looks like someone didn't bother to read article.

Your league is if Crowell was on waivers 2 weeks ago.... hahaha!!

Their coach also quoted that the Monday practice was an extra practice and that any players on the fringe due to returning from injuries were held out.

They cut a rb to make room for him. But clearly this has to do with Quizz and Martin?

There is video of him running routes/drills from June. Didn't look too bad taking jump cuts both directions in one drill. So I don't think his health will be a concern at all. Just hope they utilize him like they did last year.

All that your changed font section says is that the qb+highest projected wr tends to put up large numbers twice as often as the qb+second highest projected wr on the same team. So we've shown a clear difference between an NFL teams wr1 and wr2. Still true, as that is exactly what you said. You aren't coming here with anything new. The highest projected wr tends to score more points than other wr's on a team. A teams rb does better when the qb is scoring. When an oppossing team's qb is scoring points they tend to need to throw more often. The only thing any of this is about is what situation gives you the best odds when setting up your DFS stacks as it only looks at possible stacks on a per game basis.

All that your changed font section says is that the qb+highest projected wr tends to put up large numbers twice as often as the qb+second highest projected wr on the same team. So we've shown a clear difference between an NFL teams wr1 and wr2. How does that show anything between whether to start one wr1 vs another wr1 on a different team.

What a twat. No one was arguing over DFS here years ago, because no1 gave a about DFS several years ago. And you've clearly been away at uni studying and improving your reading comprehension in those several years away.

This doesn't make sense, because the top rated backups are going to be drafted much higher than just the random backup for whatever rb you happen to have drafted earlier. I doubt you would ever just pencil in, must draft a backup rb 10th round no matter who it is.