JCW412 0 Posted July 21, 2005 (edited) Not relevant Edited March 17, 2009 by singman Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GameDay Guru 1 Posted July 21, 2005 Any chance we could expand rosters to 25 as part of this change? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wuerffel for MVP 0 Posted July 21, 2005 Any chance we could expand rosters to 25 as part of this change? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JCW412 0 Posted July 21, 2005 Please vote on the proposal as well as bumping the roster limit to 25. I vote yes to the roster limit and the change for 2006 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wuerffel for MVP 0 Posted July 21, 2005 Yes to both as a package deal. No to the addition of a wide receiver slot WITHOUT a roster limit increase. Yes to roster limit increase without the addition of a wide receiver slot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JCW412 0 Posted July 21, 2005 Current vote for adding a WR to the starting lineup and increasing the roster limit to 25 for the 2006 season. Yes - JCW GDG W4MVP NO - Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted July 21, 2005 I would vote No to this however if it was ammended to a RBWRWRFlexFlex instead I would Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JCW412 0 Posted July 21, 2005 Current vote for adding a WR to the starting lineup and increasing the roster limit to 25 for the 2006 season. Yes - JCW GDG W4MVP NO - Moz Still waiting on 8 votes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Octopus 0 Posted July 21, 2005 I vote "yes" to both for '06. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JCW412 0 Posted July 21, 2005 Current vote for adding a WR to the starting lineup and increasing the roster limit to 25 for the 2006 season. Yes - JCW GDG W4MVP Dr.O Shox NO - Moz 6 votes to go or 2 yes votes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Brain 0 Posted July 22, 2005 yes for roster change no for expanded roster Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JCW412 0 Posted July 22, 2005 yes for roster changeno for expanded roster We are voting on a the two as a pair right now - an all or none type thing. How would you vote then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Captain Lou 0 Posted July 22, 2005 I am in, Yes to both Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Brain 0 Posted July 23, 2005 yes for roster changeno for expanded roster We are voting on a the two as a pair right now - an all or none type thing. How would you vote then? Then it is yes, it is only 1 additional player, but I don't see the need Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JCW412 0 Posted July 23, 2005 It looks like the change will be effective for the 2006 season regardless of how the others vote. Current vote for adding a WR to the starting lineup and increasing the roster limit to 25 for the 2006 season. Yes - JCW GDG W4MVP Dr.O Shox The Brain Captain Lou NO - Moz Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pmoe33 0 Posted July 27, 2005 I know I'm late and my vote doesn't matter, but I'm with Moz on this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JCW412 0 Posted July 28, 2005 Singman - can you possibly send out an email or stick this for a bit so everyone is aware of the change for 2006? We don't want to have any issues with that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted July 28, 2005 I just don't see the need to add a postion - I just think it would be better just to ammend it a little and make 1 of the mandatory RB slots into another flex. To me that just makes more sense. I will live with the decision here but just am personally against it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Captain Lou 0 Posted July 29, 2005 I just don't see the need to add a postion - I just think it would be better just to ammend it a little and make 1 of the mandatory RB slots into another flex. To me that just makes more sense. I will live with the decision here but just am personally against it. I think by adding another receiver to the roster will balance the head to head scoring a little more. I have not spent time lately on the math, but any team in this league who owns three of the 32 starting tail backs has a clear advantage in yards and points on a weekly basis. With more and more teams going to two backs, specialty backs, or RBBC, the teams in this league who do own three legit starters who produce yards and touches every week should outpoint every team who may just have a legit starter, and a roster full of RBBC. I have never been a big fan of any leagues that allowed a three back starting lineup using the flex. I would much prefer a flex to be used for other positions due to the shrinking population of legit every down backs. Plus you almost have to nuke your team in order to cut a deal for one of these guys since the value of them continues to increase each and every season. I would have no problem keeping the roster at the same starting number, but would not allow the flex position to be used for a third running back. Do the math, and see what I mean. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pmoe33 0 Posted August 9, 2005 So what would the choices for the flex spot be then? Just WR or TE? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
