Rude Rick 0 Posted October 14, 2006 But 3 1/2 years later, with no weapons found, still no end in sight and the war a liability for nearly all Republicans on the ballot Nov. 7, the justification has become far broader and now includes the expansive "struggle between good and evil." Bush's approval rating, reflected by AP-Ipsos polls, has slid from the mid 60s at the outset of the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003 to the high 30s now. There were light jumps upward after the December 2003 capture of Saddam, Bush's re-election in November 2004 and each of three series of aggressive speeches over the past year. Those gains tended to vanish quickly. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061014/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_iraq The Dems now represent true progressives AND conservatives...real conservatives hate the neocons...America hates Bush...pain at the pump...America thinks green now...America embraces radical environmentalism...Repubs are doomed come November. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TylerRoseFan 16 Posted October 14, 2006 ###### you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rude Rick 0 Posted October 15, 2006 ###### you. Defensive about losing...are we? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kpbuckeye 2 Posted October 15, 2006 Defensive about losing...are we? give it a rest rusty, seriously. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TyCobb 0 Posted October 15, 2006 From the President's 2003 State of the Union Adress in the runup to war : "The dictator who is assembling the world's most dangerous weapons has already used them on whole villages, leaving thousands of his own citizens dead, blind or disfigured... If this is not evil, then evil has no meaning." Hardly a revision. Try again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rude Rick 0 Posted October 15, 2006 From the President's 2003 State of the Union Adress in the runup to war : "The dictator who is assembling the world's most dangerous weapons has already used them on whole villages, leaving thousands of his own citizens dead, blind or disfigured... If this is not evil, then evil has no meaning." Hardly a revision. Try again. You took this from Bush's site...can we say Bushbot? More like traitor...for supporting the administration that spits on our Constitution and dangers our democracy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TyCobb 0 Posted October 17, 2006 You took this from Bush's site...can we say Bushbot? More like traitor...for supporting the administration that spits on our Constitution and dangers our democracy. No, I took it from his 2003 State of the Union speech. Ever heard of it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Greedo 13 Posted October 17, 2006 Let's have Rude Rick and fastfish just share one post between the two of them. They can post what they like, they can only post there, and then no one has to read either of them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted October 17, 2006 From the President's 2003 State of the Union Adress in the runup to war : "The dictator who is assembling the world's most dangerous weapons has already used them on whole villages, leaving thousands of his own citizens dead, blind or disfigured... If this is not evil, then evil has no meaning." Hardly a revision. Try again. "The dictator" has been in jail for a couple years now. HTH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TyCobb 0 Posted October 18, 2006 "The dictator" has been in jail for a couple years now. HTH. Yes. And soon the Iraqi people will have their justice on him. There are obviously plenty more like him running loose. HTH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rude Rick 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Yes. And soon the Iraqi people will have their justice on him. There are obviously plenty more like him running loose. HTH. Saddam was a toothless tiger...he wasn't dangerous to anyone. He was secular...the insurgents aren't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flashover 0 Posted October 18, 2006 The Bush Administration's justification for war...let's take a look back. http://democrats.reform.house.gov/IraqOnTh..._record_rep.pdf Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rude Rick 0 Posted October 18, 2006 The Bush Administration's justification for war...let's take a look back.http://democrats.reform.house.gov/IraqOnTh..._record_rep.pdf I'd like any rethug here to defend this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msudavedawg 5 Posted October 18, 2006 Yeah, we should have taken the Bill Clinton way out: just lob some cruise missles at the terrorists, bury your head in the sand, and hope the problem goes away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
D'ohmer Simpson 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Yeah, we should have taken the Bill Clinton way out: just lob some cruise missles at the terrorists, bury your head in the sand, and hope the problem goes away. Or the Bush way out, just send a handful of troops into Afghanistan and dupe the American people so you can get revenge on SH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hoytdwow 202 Posted October 18, 2006 "The dictator who is assembling the world's most dangerous weapons Kim Jong Il? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
schaef2k 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Yeah, we should have taken the Bill Clinton way out: just lob some cruise missles at the terrorists, bury your head in the sand, and hope the problem goes away. This has nothing to do with Iraq. Going into Iraq was not necessary to wage a war on terrorism and has proven a distraction from that goal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TyCobb 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Kim Jong Il? I'd say today it's a toss up between North Korea and Iran. Good question. BTW - Just so you know, the economy is still rocking along thanks to the Bush tax cuts. Hopefully we won't elect Charlie Rangel ahd his crew to screw it up. HTH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted October 18, 2006 Yes. And soon the Iraqi people will have their justice on him. There are obviously plenty more like him running loose. HTH. Nice dodge. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PackerAttacker 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Saddam was a toothless tiger...he wasn't dangerous to anyone. He was secular...the insurgents aren't. Tell that to all the women and children buried in mass graves. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PackerAttacker 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Saddam was a toothless tiger...he wasn't dangerous to anyone. He was secular...the insurgents aren't. Tell that to all the women and children buried in mass graves. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites