RoadLizard 73 Posted January 8, 2017 Wow. What an awful bunch of games so far. Unwatchable garbage with terrible teams. How the fock did the Texans win the division? How the fock did Miami make the playoffs? What is the point of the AFC even bothering to try. The red carpet has been rolled out for the Patriots again. The only resistance they had was the Ravens and Broncos but those teams are defunct now so it's automatic Pats SB berth for the next like ten years. How embarrassing. How lucky is NE to have such a cakewalk each year? They have the division locked up week one every year. Zero competition. And they aren't even really good....they have ONE good player and that's it. One. They're a .500 team masquerading as a "good" team. But with no resistance it's just handed to them. And then....the NFC which is "slightly" better is still a mishmash of crap. The Lie downs? Really? Way to show up. The Falcons are a joke too. They rack up fantasy points against crap teams but they'll fold as usual I'm sure. Giants? Packers? Maybe....but how can you hold out hope with such ineptness everywhere? That game will probably be a blowout too. GB Will not show up. Next week is no better. More blowouts to come. The league has finally jumped the shark. No wonder why ratings are down and viewership is lower than ever. Wow. Good job, Roger. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
petekrum 20 Posted January 8, 2017 Wow, just clueless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,828 Posted January 8, 2017 Blahahablahablah I hate the Pats are good every year too. But I'm not a Pats fan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murf74 461 Posted January 8, 2017 The one point you have is Pats auto #1 seed in that horrible division. Baltimore and Denver sucked. What were you watching this year Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kent 228 Posted January 8, 2017 Well, the Pats will have a harder time next year since the Bills, Jets and Dolphins will be much improved. LMAO! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TennisMenace 156 Posted January 8, 2017 Adding that second wild card was not wise in my opinion. It adds a team probably not worthy to get invited to the dance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,616 Posted January 9, 2017 Wildcard weekend usually is underwhelming... The real playoffs start next weekend anyway Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Raider 84 29 Posted January 9, 2017 Yeah pretty bad nfl weekend, but ways fun from a fanstasy aspect. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GornFishin' 57 Posted January 9, 2017 . GB Will not show up. I wonder what the score would have been if GB had shown up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kopy 534 Posted January 9, 2017 Wildcard weekend usually is underwhelming... The real playoffs start next weekend anywayI think the first week is really just the been there and done that teams winning, and like you said, next week is the fun. Seattle, Green Bay, Pittsburgh are always in the playoffs, know how to win this time of year. They were playing 2 first time coaches, and a detroit team that can't handle success. The veteran teams just make it look easy in round one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,616 Posted January 9, 2017 I think the first week is really just the been there and done that teams winning, and like you said, next week is the fun. Seattle, Green Bay, Pittsburgh are always in the playoffs, know how to win this time of year. They were playing 2 first time coaches, and a detroit team that can't handle success. The veteran teams just make it look easy in round one. plus rookie QBs, career backup QBs, hurt QBs starting... Not surprising this round sucked balls Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R8RMick 242 Posted January 9, 2017 The one point you have is Pats auto #1 seed in that horrible division. Baltimore and Denver sucked. What were you watching this year That's just the way of the NFL, always has been. The old K Gun Buffalo Bills were in four Super Bowls because of this. They played in a horrible AFC East- NYJ, NE, MIA back in the early 90's were all bad. The Bills would steamroll the division, finish 12-4, then have home field throughout the playoffs. Buffalo in January is a brutal place to play. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maulers1973 117 Posted January 9, 2017 I think Roger is the NFL's worst commish ever!! Outside of that your entire post was pretty lame. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,005 Posted January 9, 2017 I think Ben Rothlisburger looks very uncomfortable when passing the ball , like he's unsure of where to go with it. I think they are going to have a tough game this next weekend. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TD Ryan2 316 Posted January 9, 2017 How lucky is NE to have such a cakewalk each year? 16 straight years of cakewalks... Roadie's finally giving up... the last bastion of haters has finally succumbed to NE's greatness! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murf74 461 Posted January 9, 2017 I think Ben Rothlisburger looks very uncomfortable when passing the ball , like he's unsure of where to go with it. I think they are going to have a tough game this next weekend. I think you may be in the great minority in that assessment of him looking unsure where to go with the ball. If that were the case his sacks would be way up. Will they have a tough time, sure probably. But did you watch the last KC / PItt game this year? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,005 Posted January 9, 2017 I do see that last KC / Pitt game. And it has nothing to do with this weekend. I think Rothlisburger looks uncomfortable to me. They need to start thinking about drafting another Qb. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murf74 461 Posted January 10, 2017 I do see that last KC / Pitt game. And it has nothing to do with this weekend. I think Rothlisburger looks uncomfortable to me. They need to start thinking about drafting another Qb. Your cracking me up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,005 Posted January 10, 2017 I'm serious , it's time for them to get ready to develop a Qb for the future. I think Ben as taken enough. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murf74 461 Posted January 10, 2017 I'm serious , it's time for them to get ready to develop a Qb for the future. I think Ben as taken enough. Ben has lost nothing off his arm. They need a better #2 but Ben has probably at min 3 more years before you see a decline enough to think about his final days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,005 Posted January 10, 2017 3 more years is enough time to develop another Qb yes ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,017 Posted January 10, 2017 Is this the thread where butthurt little b1tches whine about the Pats again? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray_T 718 Posted January 10, 2017 I do see that last KC / Pitt game. And it has nothing to do with this weekend. I think Rothlisburger looks uncomfortable to me. They need to start thinking about drafting another Qb. one thing I'll say for sure, the winner of this game has the best chance to knock off the pats prior to Super bowl. Houston sure isnt gonna get it done. I'll say that much for sure. On the other side, I think 3 of the 4 teams have a decent shot at beating the Pats if they make the super bowl. Highest probability goes to the Seahawks whose playing style has traditionally been tough for the Pats team as a whole. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kent 228 Posted January 10, 2017 I do see that last KC / Pitt game. And it has nothing to do with this weekend. I think Rothlisburger looks uncomfortable to me. They need to start thinking about drafting another Qb. He looks fine. Many times a game you can't throw because guys are covered. The TV doesn't show the whole field. I really want the networks to experiment with wide angled full field live action. Need to see defenses earning their money. These guys are good. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kent 228 Posted January 10, 2017 I do see that last KC / Pitt game. And it has nothing to do with this weekend. I think Rothlisburger looks uncomfortable to me. They need to start thinking about drafting another Qb. DP Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,005 Posted January 10, 2017 I will give you that point Kent. Plus I think that after Bell and especially Brown , Ben really doesn't have a lot of good options. There comes a time to start thinking about the coming future , and looking at developing another Qb isn't a bad thing either , is it ? Read that the Gmen might be thinking the same thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
petekrum 20 Posted January 10, 2017 I will give you that point Kent. Plus I think that after Bell and especially Brown , Ben really doesn't have a lot of good options. There comes a time to start thinking about the coming future , and looking at developing another Qb isn't a bad thing either , is it ? Read that the Gmen might be thinking the same thing. If he were to fall I'd love to see them draft and develop Watson. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,208 Posted January 11, 2017 I think Roger is the NFL's worst commish ever!! Outside of that your entire post was pretty lame. I bet the owners would disagree with you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,994 Posted January 11, 2017 I bet the owners would disagree with you. Oh I don't think so at all. The owners are making more money than they ever have - and they ultimately could fire him if they wanted to. Instead - they are giving Rog $20m a year. Wish I was that hated. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,005 Posted January 11, 2017 I think Hawkeye was on the same page. The owners are truly happy with good ol rog. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,994 Posted January 11, 2017 I think Hawkeye was on the same page. The owners are truly happy with food ol rog. True, my bad Hawks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,208 Posted January 12, 2017 No problem. It's well known that Rogers has made the owners a ton of money and that is really all they care about. Rogers has also help build the NFL into the most popular sport in America and spread it's popularity across the world. I don't like Rogers just like most fans but he's done more with the NFL than any commissioner ever has. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,005 Posted January 12, 2017 Don't underestimate how much ff and betting as on the popularity to the game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoadLizard 73 Posted January 13, 2017 Don't underestimate how much ff and beating as on the popularity to the game. Hugely agree - especially the fantasy aspect. A good indicator of this is how much fantasy talk you hear at the coffee machine in the ofice on Monday versus actual game talk. At my workplace its like 75% fantasy talk and 25% NFL game talk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,208 Posted January 13, 2017 The NFL has recognized that betting and fantasy football are huge and they've embraced it. Instead of turning it away they are using it to their advantage. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kent 228 Posted January 13, 2017 Oh I don't think so at all. The owners are making more money than they ever have - and they ultimately could fire him if they wanted to. Instead - they are giving Rog $20m a year. Wish I was that hated. Roger is making more than double that a year I believe. Think it's 42 mil. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murf74 461 Posted January 15, 2017 I will give you that point Kent. Plus I think that after Bell and especially Brown , Ben really doesn't have a lot of good options. There comes a time to start thinking about the coming future , and looking at developing another Qb isn't a bad thing either , is it ? Read that the Gmen might be thinking the same thing. They did draft Landry Jones high and he had the resume. He only developed so far. They have Mettenburger now who I think will take over for Landry as 2nd string and they probably draft a young QB, but nothing in the first 4 rounds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Oriole8159 86 Posted January 15, 2017 They did draft Landry Jones high and he had the resume. He only developed so far. They have Mettenburger now who I think will take over for Landry as 2nd string and they probably draft a young QB, but nothing in the first 4 rounds. Mettenberger's not a long term option though and it's not a very deep draft for QBs this year, so I'd say if you're not taking one early then don't even bother this year. Just re-sign Bruce Gradkowski as your #3 for next year, and try to see if you can develop an UDFA on your practice squad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Donkey 34 Posted January 15, 2017 They did draft Landry Jones high and he had the resume. He only developed so far. They have Mettenburger now who I think will take over for Landry as 2nd string and they probably draft a young QB, but nothing in the first 4 rounds. I believe it's spelled Muttonburger. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites