Gepetto 1,113 Posted April 3, 2022 6 dead https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/they-killed-my-sister-chaos-in-the-streets-as-at-least-6-die-10-are-hurt-in-sacramento-shooting-rampage/ar-AAVOble?rt=0&ocid=Win10NewsApp&referrerID=InAppShare edit: Shooters at large. Multiple suspects. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 6,373 Posted April 3, 2022 Barely even news at this point, sadly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,860 Posted April 3, 2022 gun free zone sign didnt work? 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bier Meister 1,566 Posted April 3, 2022 about to drive through in a few hours... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,593 Posted April 3, 2022 Newsom blames guns for Sacramento mass shooting https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gavin-newsom-california-sacramento-mass-shooting-blame-guns Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,770 Posted April 3, 2022 24 minutes ago, Baker Boy said: Newsom blames guns for Sacramento mass shooting https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gavin-newsom-california-sacramento-mass-shooting-blame-guns Inept leadership looks for the scapegoat, instead of facing the problem. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GobbleDog 890 Posted April 3, 2022 51 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said: gun free zone sign didnt work? Nope. Nor did any pointless gun law such as background checks, magazine size limits, 3 day wait period, etc. As unbelievable as it seems, meaningless gun laws don't significantly reduce gun violence. Perhaps a ban on commercial firearm sales might help. Works for other first world countries. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 6,373 Posted April 3, 2022 23 minutes ago, Baker Boy said: Newsom blames guns for Sacramento mass shooting https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gavin-newsom-california-sacramento-mass-shooting-blame-guns Ridiculous. We don’t even know yet if this is one of those gunless mass shootings. Maybe the victims fell on the bullets? 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,052 Posted April 3, 2022 1 hour ago, Baker Boy said: Newsom blames guns for Sacramento mass shooting https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gavin-newsom-california-sacramento-mass-shooting-blame-guns If he's worried about violence maybe he should keep violent felons locked up instead of letting them walk with no bail. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,052 Posted April 3, 2022 1 hour ago, Bier Meister said: about to drive through in a few hours... Drove through yesterday. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JustinCharge 2,397 Posted April 3, 2022 56 minutes ago, GobbleDog said: Nope. Nor did any pointless gun law such as background checks, magazine size limits, 3 day wait period, etc. As unbelievable as it seems, meaningless gun laws don't significantly reduce gun violence. Perhaps a ban on commercial firearm sales might help. Works for other first world countries. There were 199 deaths in the US from mass shootings in 2022. France had 158. Norway had 69. Look, 3D printed guns will make gun laws moot anyway. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,725 Posted April 3, 2022 1 minute ago, JustinCharge said: There were 199 deaths in the US from mass shootings in 2022. France had 158. Norway had 69. Look, 3D printed guns will make gun laws moot anyway. 2022 isn't over yet, right? Link? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JustinCharge 2,397 Posted April 3, 2022 Also, its pretty funny hearing liberals call to ban guns again, after cheering Ukraine which suddenly found a need to arm its citizens with guns. Bit too late though. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,759 Posted April 3, 2022 Kinda frightening they don’t even have a suspect Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NEWPOSTERGUY! 270 Posted April 3, 2022 11 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: Kinda frightening they don’t even have a suspect Usually means the suspect in not white. 1 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Utilit99 4,099 Posted April 3, 2022 4 minutes ago, NEWPOSTERGUY! said: Usually means the suspect in not white. Yeah. If they knew he was white the headlines would be: WHITE Person at Large for Shooting 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lod001 1,311 Posted April 3, 2022 51 minutes ago, JustinCharge said: Also, its pretty funny hearing liberals call to ban guns again, after cheering Ukraine which suddenly found a need to arm its citizens with guns. Bit too late though. Libtards never think. They have no idea what they said 5 minutes ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,052 Posted April 3, 2022 55 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: Kinda frightening they don’t even have a suspect Prolly cuz there's multiple suspects. Some of whom are prolly illegal. All of whom used firearms illegally. Doesn't fit the false narrative of rampant "gun violence." 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 6,373 Posted April 3, 2022 1 minute ago, 5-Points said: Prolly cuz there's multiple suspects. Some of whom are prolly illegal. All of whom used firearms illegally. Doesn't fit the false narrative of rampant "gun violence." What kind of violence is a mass shooting, if not gun violence? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Utilit99 4,099 Posted April 3, 2022 27 minutes ago, lod001 said: Libtards never think. They have no idea what they said 5 minutes ago. It's not even funny anymore. It's downright troublesome. One reporter the other day asked biden if what he said in a speech could have negative circumstances. And he read verbatim to biden what biden said on three different times, and the first thing out of biden's mouth was. "I didn't say that." And then he realized how stupid that sounded and he he wasn't going to get away with that approach so be simply backtracked on all of it. nasty pelosi doesn't follow her own orders, doesn't wear a mask at a salon and promptly tells the country she was set up by the owner and that puts the salon out of business. newsome doesn't follow his own mask orders many times. creepy joe pulls his mask down to cough in public. oac says her life was in danger when she was a mile away from selfie fest. And she said she needed therapy afterword because of PTSD Beetlejuice lightfoot in Chicago defunded police and has her own 10 person or so police detail following her around. Oh, and there's this classic take from another retard: All these democratic retards and more need to be gone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,052 Posted April 3, 2022 2 minutes ago, MDC said: What kind of violence is a mass shooting, if not gun violence? People are violent, guns aren't. The term "gun violence" is intentionally used to divert your attention from the actual problem. It's a people problem not a gun problem. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 6,373 Posted April 3, 2022 1 minute ago, 5-Points said: People are violent, guns aren't. The term "gun violence" is intentionally used to divert your attention from the actual problem. It's a people problem not a gun problem. Just a coincidence that upwards of 80% of all murders are committed by firearm? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,593 Posted April 3, 2022 3 minutes ago, MDC said: Just a coincidence that upwards of 80% of all murders are committed by firearm? No, they were committed by bad people. Less than .01% of the guns in this country are used in a murder. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,052 Posted April 3, 2022 1 minute ago, MDC said: Just a coincidence that upwards of 80% of all murders are committed by firearm? More people are killed with fists and feet every year than are killed with guns. An inanimate object cannot be violent. It must be used by a violent person to commit violence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 6,373 Posted April 3, 2022 1 minute ago, Baker Boy said: No, they were committed by bad people. Bad people who overwhelmingly chose guns as their weapon of choice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 6,373 Posted April 3, 2022 1 minute ago, 5-Points said: More people are killed with fists and feet every year than are killed with guns. Link? That’s not true in the US. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,255 Posted April 3, 2022 2 hours ago, GobbleDog said: Nope. Nor did any pointless gun law such as background checks, magazine size limits, 3 day wait period, etc. As unbelievable as it seems, meaningless gun laws don't significantly reduce gun violence. Perhaps a ban on commercial firearm sales might help. Works for other first world countries. Can't ban guns now that the left weaponized protests. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,052 Posted April 3, 2022 Just now, MDC said: Link? That’s not true in the US. OK, since we're shifting goal posts, how many of those murders were committed with legally owned handguns by nonviolent individuals? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,255 Posted April 3, 2022 4 minutes ago, MDC said: Link? That’s not true in the US. Doesn't matter if a 1000 people a day die from guns. As soon as the government let protestors start burning down businesses as a political tool, the use case for personal gun ownership was set in concrete. 2 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Utilit99 4,099 Posted April 3, 2022 12 minutes ago, Baker Boy said: No, they were committed by bad people. Less than .01% of the guns in this country are used in a murder. mdc has the mentality of a liberal. It's the gun's fault. He would rather see a rise in other types of murders. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GobbleDog 890 Posted April 3, 2022 14 minutes ago, 5-Points said: People are violent, guns aren't. People are violent, fully-automatic weapons aren't. Fully-automatic weapons should be legal. People are violent, grenades aren't. Grenades should be legal. People are violent, bombs aren't. Bombs should be legal. Etc. That logic is obviously ridiculous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,052 Posted April 3, 2022 2 minutes ago, nobody said: Doesn't matter if a 1000 people a day die from guns. As soon as the government let protestors start burning down businesses as a political tool, the use case for personal gun ownership was set in concrete. Nobody dies "from guns." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Utilit99 4,099 Posted April 3, 2022 1 minute ago, GobbleDog said: People are violent, fully-automatic weapons aren't. Fully-automatic weapons should be legal. People are violent, grenades aren't. Grenades should be legal. People are violent, bombs aren't. Bombs should be legal. Etc. That logic is obviously ridiculous. Grenades don't help in protecting yourself or your home. Neither do bombs. See how not ridiculous that is? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,759 Posted April 3, 2022 Guns don’t kill people — but damn if they aren’t quite efficient at it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 6,373 Posted April 3, 2022 3 minutes ago, 5-Points said: OK, since we're shifting goal posts, how many of those murders were committed with legally owned handguns by nonviolent individuals? I’m shifting goal posts? You just made a nonsense claim. Im not anti gun ownership and I don’t know what % of homicides are committed by legal vs illegal gun owners. I would guess the % is very low. That doesn’t change the fact that the US has an epidemic of gun violence and our lax gun laws are part of the reason. 4 minutes ago, nobody said: Doesn't matter if a 1000 people a day die from guns. As soon as the government let protestors start burning down businesses as a political tool, the use case for personal gun ownership was set in concrete. I’m not against legal gun ownership. 2 minutes ago, Utilit99 said: mdc has the mentality of a liberal. It's the gun's fault. Obsessed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,052 Posted April 3, 2022 Just now, GobbleDog said: People are violent, fully-automatic weapons aren't. Fully-automatic weapons should be legal. People are violent, grenades aren't. Grenades should be legal. People are violent, bombs aren't. Bombs should be legal. Etc. That logic is obviously ridiculous. Peaceful people can enjoy all of those without incident. You have no point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,255 Posted April 3, 2022 Just now, 5-Points said: Nobody dies "from guns." I don't care about the stupid semantic argument. Guns enable people to kill other people efficiently. If guns didn't exist the ability to kill people would be diminished. That all is completely moot. Government told law enforcement to stand down while people had their personal property destroyed. If that is what they want to do, they are forcing people to defend their own property and people need guns for that. In fact, they need more powerful weapons than what we have now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GobbleDog 890 Posted April 3, 2022 Just now, Utilit99 said: Grenades don't help in protecting yourself or your home. Neither do bombs. That's a fair argument. I still don't think it's worth it, considering every other first world country doesn't need guns to protect their homes. But at least it's logical. The "guns aren't violent" argument for keeping them legal is just ridiculous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,255 Posted April 3, 2022 4 minutes ago, GobbleDog said: That's a fair argument. I still don't think it's worth it, considering every other first world country doesn't need guns to protect their homes. But at least it's logical. The "guns aren't violent" argument for keeping them legal is just ridiculous. In the US we absolutely do need guns to protect our property. We allow people to burn down our businesses in the name of social justice. I wasn't a proponent of the 2nd amendment until they pulled that shìt. Now I believe everyone not only should have a gun, but needs an arsenal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Utilit99 4,099 Posted April 3, 2022 2 minutes ago, GobbleDog said: That's a fair argument. I still don't think it's worth it, considering every other first world country doesn't need guns to protect their homes. But at least it's logical. The "guns aren't violent" argument for keeping them legal is just ridiculous. How about a compromise. We get rid of democrat "leaders". The twenty cities in the United States with the highest murder rates (murders per 100,000 people) are: St. Louis, MO (69.4) - Democrat Mayor Baltimore, MD (51.1) - Democrat Mayor New Orleans, LA (40.6) - Democrat Mayor Detroit, MI (39.7) - Democrat Mayor Cleveland, OH (33.7) - Democrat Mayor Las Vegas, NV (31.4) - Democrat Mayor Kansas City, MO (31.2) - Democrat Mayor Memphis, TN (27.1) - Democrat Mayor Newark, NJ (25.6) - Democrat Mayor Chicago, IL (24) - Democrat Mayor Cincinnati, OH (23.8) - Democrat Mayor Philadelphia, PA (20.2) - Democrat Mayor Milwaukee, WI (20.0) - Democrat Mayor Tulsa, OK (18.6) - Republican Mayor - Pittsburgh, PA (18.4) - Democrat Mayor Indianapolis, IN (17.7) - Democrat Mayor Louisville, KY (17.5) - Democrat Mayor Oakland, CA (17.1) - Democrat Mayor Washington D.C. (17.0) - Democrat Mayor Atlanta, GA (16.7) - Democrat Mayor 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
