Jump to content
Utilit99

Twitter adopts 'poison pill' to prevent Elon Musk takeover

Recommended Posts

On 10/7/2024 at 1:50 PM, TimHauck said:

Some more information on Musk using his power as the owner of X to steal the “America” handle.  And then proceed to post that “Trump is the only candidate on the right side of these issues” with that handle.  But nope, you guys are right, Musk the person and X the company are totally separate.

https://www.disruptionist.com/p/elon-musk-takes-america-x-handle
 

 

@Strike, any thoughts on this action by Musk?  Still just him giving his personal opinion and staying separate from the company?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

@Strike, any thoughts on this action by Musk?  Still just him giving his personal opinion and staying separate from the company?

Oh look, little Timmy put on his metal helmet and wants to come out and play. :lol:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Horseman said:

Oh look, little Timmy put on his metal helmet and wants to come out and play. :lol:

Still waiting on those discord screenshots, liar.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Still waiting on those discord screenshots, liar.

Little Timmy need some attention!  Strike, won't you talk to me, pretty pretty please? 🤣🤣🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Still waiting on those discord screenshots, liar.

🪖

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/7/2024 at 1:50 PM, TimHauck said:

Some more information on Musk using his power as the owner of X to steal the “America” handle.  And then proceed to post that “Trump is the only candidate on the right side of these issues” with that handle.  But nope, you guys are right, Musk the person and X the company are totally separate.

https://www.disruptionist.com/p/elon-musk-takes-america-x-handle
 

 

Probably should have tagged @5-Points as well, any thoughts?

 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Little Timmy need some attention!  Strike, won't you talk to me, pretty pretty please? 🤣🤣🤣

Weird that whenever righties like you and @Strike get proven wrong you usually just disappear and don’t actually admit you were wrong.

Still waiting on those discord screenshots, liar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Weird that whenever righties like you and @Strike get proven wrong you usually just disappear and don’t actually admit you were wrong.

Still waiting on those discord screenshots, liar.

Keep waiting scumbag.  Not my fault they took them down as fast as they could.  Link to you proving that I'm wrong?  You can't.  

Horseman 2357 Little Timmy 0

:first:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

@Strike, any thoughts on this action by Musk?  Still just him giving his personal opinion and staying separate from the company?

Nope.  I will note that your own article talks about multiple policies that X has that allows it to take back handles, including one regarding non-use of the account, and this account hasn't been used in a couple of years apparently.  So, as usual, you're looking for a gotcha where none exists.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Weird that whenever righties like you and @Strike get proven wrong you usually just disappear and don’t actually admit you were wrong.

Still waiting on those discord screenshots, liar.

What was I proven wrong about GotchaBoy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Keep waiting scumbag.  Not my fault they took them down as fast as they could.  Link to you proving that I'm wrong?  You can't.  

Horseman 2357 Little Timmy 0

:first:

Lolololol more lies.  Just admit you fell for a fake profile from a parody account 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Strike said:

Nope.  I will note that your own article talks about multiple policies that X has that allows it to take back handles, including one regarding non-use of the account, and this account hasn't been used in a couple of years apparently.  So, as usual, you're looking for a gotcha where none exists.  

I never said it was against X’s policies to do that.  I said Musk used his authority as the owner of the site to be able to do it, thus inserting his politics into actions of the company.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Strike said:

What was I proven wrong about GotchaBoy?

You thought the kid killed in North Dakota’s mom was already on her way to pick him up from a night of underage drinking at 2am, and he wasn’t specifically calling her because he was afraid of the crazy dude.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You thought the kid killed in North Dakota’s mom was already on her way to pick him up from a night of underage drinking at 2am, and he wasn’t specifically calling her because he was afraid of the crazy dude.

Maybe try loosening the chin strap a little bit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I never said it was against X’s policies to do that.  I said Musk used his authority as the owner of the site to be able to do it, thus inserting his politics into actions of the company.

Actions of the company lol.  He took one, inactive account.   Compare that to the CENSORSHIP the previous regime at Twitter used to perform daily, and only against conservatives.  GTFOH with this.  Don't be such a joke.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You thought the kid killed in North Dakota’s mom was already on her way to pick him up from a night of underage drinking at 2am, and he wasn’t specifically calling her because he was afraid of the crazy dude.

Still with that????  ROFLMAO. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Maybe try loosening the chin strap a little bit?

Says the guy who has fallen for countless fake social media posts, thinks military helicopters are deliberately sabotaging hurricane supply relief areas, and thinks Hunter Biden d1ck pics should have been allowed on Twitter.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimHauck said:

Says the guy who has fallen for countless fake social media posts, thinks military helicopters are deliberately sabotaging hurricane supply relief areas, and thinks Hunter Biden d1ck pics should have been allowed on Twitter.

Wait.  Aren't you the guy who told me SBF wasn't testifying in front of congress because some kid in a gaming chatroom said so???????   GTFOH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

C'mon, Strike.  It's all the same!!  :lol:

All he does anymore is try for "gotchas" on those of us who have made him look foolish in the past.  It's really sad.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Strike said:

Actions of the company lol.  He took one, inactive account.   Compare that to the CENSORSHIP the previous regime at Twitter used to perform daily, and only against conservatives.  GTFOH with this.  Don't be such a joke.

Again, why does it have to be a comparison?  

And again, there is more to being politically neutral than just not censoring one side more than the other (lololol at “only” conservatives though).   

X is not politically neutral.   Musk using his power as owner of the site to take an inactive username to directly support Trump is proof of this.  

Kudos to @nobody for seemingly being the only righty here willing to admit that.
 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Strike said:

Wait.  Aren't you the guy who told me SBF wasn't testifying in front of congress because some kid in a gaming chatroom said so???????   GTFOH.

He never actually did.  He had said he was going to but was arrested before he got the chance, so neither of us were proven correct on that one.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Again, why does it have to be a comparison?  

And again, there is more to being politically neutral than just not censoring one side more than the other (lololol at “only” conservatives though).   

X is not politically neutral.   Musk using his power as owner of the site to take an inactive username to directly support Trump is proof of this.  

Kudos to @nobody for seemingly being the only righty here willing to admit that.
 

 

It's a comparison because the reason most of us love the fact that Musk bought Twitter is because he did it for free speech reasons.  And the free speech he speaks of was because old Twitter was censoring one side of the political aisle.  He didn't take an account to directly support Trump.  He took an account so he could separate his political posts from his personal ones.  He was going to post whatever he was going to post in support of Trump regardless.  This just gives him a dedicated space to do so.  While the posts are political this doesn't move the needle as far as politics go.  Censoring the right does.  HTH.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He never actually did.  He had said he was going to but was arrested before he got the chance, so neither of us were proven correct on that one.

Wrong.  You said he wasn't even scheduled to do so.  And he was.  Funny you're trying to change your stance now.  At the time you admitted you were incorrect.  Trying to change the narrative because he got arrested just makes you look even more foolish.  You should have quit while you were behind.

Anyways, the point of my post in this thread was to show that you were duped by SM while you're chastising someone else for that same thing.  I mean, seriously, a kid in a gaming chat room?????  My stance on SBF testifying was supported by legit sources, and IIRC I even linked them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Says the guy who has fallen for countless fake social media posts, thinks military helicopters are deliberately sabotaging hurricane supply relief areas, and thinks Hunter Biden d1ck pics should have been allowed on Twitter.

Everyone is laughing at you.:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Strike said:

It's a comparison because the reason most of us love the fact that Musk bought Twitter is because he did it for free speech reasons.  And the free speech he speaks of was because old Twitter was censoring one side of the political aisle.  He didn't take an account to directly support Trump.  He took an account so he could separate his political posts from his personal ones.  He was going to post whatever he was going to post in support of Trump regardless.  This just gives him a dedicated space to do so.  While the posts are political this doesn't move the needle as far as politics go.  Censoring the right does.  HTH.

This is a joke right?  Are you suggesting because Musk took the “America” handle he’s not going to make political posts from his personal account anymore?

If so, holy fock you’re dumb.  For one, that’s already not happening.  And even if it was, he didn’t need to take a handle that was already taken in order to do that.

Speaking of censorship and @Horseman’s blatant lies, also a friendly reminder that after the Georgia school shooting Musk was censoring searches for the name of the shooter.
 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rumor is they had to burn down the school to get Hauck out of the 3rd grade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Strike said:

Wrong.  You said he wasn't even scheduled to do so.  And he was.  Funny you're trying to change your stance now.  At the time you admitted you were incorrect.  Trying to change the narrative because he got arrested just makes you look even more foolish.  You should have quit while you were behind.

Anyways, the point of my post in this thread was to show that you were duped by SM while you're chastising someone else for that same thing.  I mean, seriously, a kid in a gaming chat room?????  My stance on SBF testifying was supported by legit sources, and IIRC I even linked them. 

Here was my last post on that.  I admitted I was wrong that he was supposedly “planning” to testify, but that we’d never know for sure if he would have.    I also had admitted that I didn’t realize there were supposed to be hearings in front of both the Senate and House, and it was confirmed by a senator that he refused to testify in front of Senate, so I was still skeptical he actually would have showed up for the Congress one.  

edited to add:  So the post I cited was never really proven to be fake.   On the other hand, @Horseman has probably fallen for like 5+ fake social media posts just in the past month.

 

On 2/25/2024 at 3:15 PM, TimHauck said:

That’s the difference between me and you.  I admitted I was wrong that SBF was supposedly planning to testify in front of congress (unfortunately we’ll never know if he actually would have).  You never do, like in the example I just linked, you said something like “well I just said I doubted it, that doesn’t make me wrong.”   Or in the North Dakota thread where you disappeared after I factually proved you wrong.  Or multiple times in the Covid thread.

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Horseman said:

Hauck grabbed a bowl when the weatherman said it was chilly outside.

You think military helicopters are deliberately sabotaging hurricane supply relief areas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimHauck said:

You think military helicopters are deliberately sabotaging hurricane supply relief areas.

If I gave you a penny for your thoughts I'd get change back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Horseman said:

If I gave you a penny for your thoughts I'd get change back.

Sorry I’ll stick to the thread subject.  Do you think Hunter Biden d1ck pics should be allowed on x/twitter?

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Horseman said:

Maybe try loosening the chin strap a little bit?

🪖

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Musk is the GOAT.  Need proof? 

 

:first:

He seems to be implying wokeism is why you don’t want kids, @Horseman

 

 

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

He seems to be implying wokeism is why you don’t want kids, @Horseman

 

 

How many times I have to tell you simpleton?  Musk wants overpopulation because he wants to colonize mars.  Has nothing to do with WOKE.   FFS   :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Horseman said:

How many times I have to tell you simpleton?  Musk wants overpopulation because he want to colonize mars.  Has nothing to do with WOKE.   FFS   :doh:

I didn’t interpret that as anything to do with his own opinion, but rather a gross oversimplification about his thoughts on each of the generation’s opinions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×