HellToupee 1,254 Posted November 14 11 minutes ago, Patented Phil said: Not a fan of Gaetz. Not sure what Trump was thinking with that one. I can’t see him getting confirmed. Why create infighting with Republican Senators? My Conservative friends - someone explain this to me. I doubt he gets through but it’s a big middle finger to the DOJ. Gaetz had Donald’s back and he values loyalty. Not everyone is going to get through I can’t imagine what’s going through Kevin McCarthy’s mind right now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
purdygood 306 Posted November 14 Is there a hat that says "Make My Real Father Love Me Again" ? my bad. Just found them on Don Jr's website Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,254 Posted November 14 19 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: His first term was nearly destroyed by weak men around him. He’s not playing games his time. Exactly. Scorched earth. Watch the heads explode with the RFK announcement Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 1,987 Posted November 14 4 hours ago, squistion said: Fun Fact: This is the same Matt Gaetz that is under an ethics investigation in the House for paying underage girls for sex at a drug party. Fun Fact: There is no ethics investigation when he's no longer part of the senate. Oopsie! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 1,987 Posted November 14 30 minutes ago, Patented Phil said: I can’t see him getting confirmed. 9 minutes ago, HellToupee said: I doubt he gets through but it’s a big middle finger to the DOJ. Recess Appointment. He will serve a full two years before congress get's back around to it. WINNING 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,254 Posted November 14 5 minutes ago, Horseman said: Recess Appointment. He will serve a full two years before congress get's back around to it. WINNING He’s officially resigned from Congress Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 1,658 Posted November 14 https://x.com/tribelaw/status/1856860325737271335 “Trump said that by choosing Gaetz he was keeping his campaign promise of creating jobs for unskilled white men.” — @BorowitzReport (11/13/24) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BirdGang 347 Posted November 14 1 hour ago, purdygood said: Maybe... just maybe.. he is an incompetent old narcissistic felon, con man buffoon? Libtears! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 2,452 Posted November 14 1 hour ago, HellToupee said: Exactly. Scorched earth. Watch the heads explode with the RFK announcement Why will heads explode? He’s already announced he’ll let Bobby “go wild” Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 1,785 Posted November 14 12 hours ago, Horseman said: Fun Fact: There is no ethics investigation when he's no longer part of the senate. Oopsie! House, not senate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 1,444 Posted November 14 Barron’s IQ is 170 (or 2.12 Kamalas). I hope they can find a cabinet spot for Boy Wonder. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 1,658 Posted November 14 1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said: House, not senate. Oopsie! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 5,232 Posted November 14 1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said: House, not senate. Forget it, he’s rolling. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,254 Posted November 14 4 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Barron’s IQ is 170 (or 2.12 Kamalas). I hope they can find a cabinet spot for Boy Wonder. We’re destined to have the 1st uncle/niece ticket with Barron & Kai Trump in 20 years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 1,987 Posted November 14 17 minutes ago, squistion said: Oopsie! 16 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: Forget it, he’s rolling. Distinction without a difference. House ethics committee doesn't matter if you're not a member of the house. Get it now? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 5,232 Posted November 14 3 minutes ago, Horseman said: Distinction without a difference. House ethics committee doesn't matter if you're not a member of the house. Get it now? Dude I got it before. It doesn’t change the fact that this is probably the most embarrassing appointment in political history which is saying a lot. The reporting this morning is that it has no chance of actually going through, but of THAT I’m not so sure. One should never underestimate the capacity of Republican senators to make total fools of themselves in order to show fealty to Trump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 4,815 Posted November 14 16 hours ago, Strike said: What crimes has Matt Gaetz been convicted of? And since you brought him up, what do you think of Roman Polanski settling ANOTHER child rape case a few weeks ago? Bump for @The Real timschochet. You asked me a question. I answered it and asked you a couple of questions in reply. And what do you think about your hero settling ANOTHER child rape case? https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/roman-polanski-rape-minor-allegation-settled-1236042311/ So much for you wanting intelligent conversation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 209 Posted November 14 5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: Dude I got it before. It doesn’t change the fact that this is probably the most embarrassing appointment in political history which is saying a lot. The reporting this morning is that it has no chance of actually going through, but of THAT I’m not so sure. One should never underestimate the capacity of Republican senators to make total fools of themselves in order to show fealty to Trump. Oh wait, he should put in an illegal tranny for the job. Sour grapes much? This kicks ass. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 5,232 Posted November 14 2 minutes ago, Strike said: Bump for @The Real timschochet. You asked me a question. I answered it and asked you a couple of questions in reply. And what do you think about your hero settling ANOTHER child rape case? https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/roman-polanski-rape-minor-allegation-settled-1236042311/ So much for you wanting intelligent conversation. You didn’t answer my question, and your ability for intelligent conversation is consistently lacking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 4,815 Posted November 14 3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: You didn’t answer my question, and your ability for intelligent conversation is consistently lacking. I asked a clarifying question. You wanted me to compare Matt Gaetz's crimes to Roman Polanski's. How can I do that when I don't know which crimes you're referring to. With Roman Polanski it's pretty easy and I think I know what you're referring to. We've discussed at least one of them for years. Which crime(s) has Matt Gaetz been convicted of that you want me to compare Roman Polanski to? In addition, I'd like to know what you think about Roman Polanski settling another lawsuit accusing him of child rape? Do you think that girl looked older than her age? We all know you consider a girl looking older than her age to be a valid defense against child rape. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 4,815 Posted November 14 3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: You didn’t answer my question, and your ability for intelligent conversation is consistently lacking. YOU called me out for this discussion. If you don't want to have it don't call someone out. Don't run away now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
purdygood 306 Posted November 14 54 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Barron’s IQ is 170 (or 2.12 Kamalas). I hope they can find a cabinet spot for Boy Wonder. If Barron's IQ is 170 then he and his Dad must be combining scores. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 5,232 Posted November 14 29 minutes ago, Strike said: YOU called me out for this discussion. If you don't want to have it don't call someone out. Don't run away now. I have to run away because I’m tied up today and won’t be able to post. But you failed to answer my question. The only correct answer you could have offered was something to the effect of “you’re right; I guess I’m a hypocrite and a moron.” Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 4,815 Posted November 14 3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: I have to run away because I’m tied up today and won’t be able to post. But you failed to answer my question. The only correct answer you could have offered was something to the effect of “you’re right; I guess I’m a hypocrite and a moron.” Horrible. You're such a horrible poster. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 1,658 Posted November 14 8 minutes ago, purdygood said: If Barron's IQ is 170 then he and his Dad must be combining scores. From the Twitters: Quote Readers added context they thought people might want to know There’s no factual proof that Barron Trump has a IQ level of 170, the author is simply stating false facts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 2,500 Posted November 14 14 hours ago, Horseman said: Fun Fact: There is no ethics investigation when he's no longer part of the senate. Oopsie! Uhhh 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 2,500 Posted November 14 For a party whose fringe has a very vocal obsession that all of DC is involved in a sex trafficking cabal to pick Matt focking Gaetz to be the face of legal matters is great shtick. Bravo! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 1,444 Posted November 14 18 minutes ago, squistion said: From the Twitters: There’s no factual proof that Barron Trump has a IQ level of 170, the author is simply stating false facts. You have no proof it isn’t. Quit spreading fake news. TIA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,254 Posted November 14 44 minutes ago, squistion said: From the Twitters: There’s no factual proof that Barron Trump has a IQ level of 170, the author is simply stating false facts. Who tweeted that JayChasJohnson? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,254 Posted November 14 31 minutes ago, thegeneral said: For a party whose fringe has a very vocal obsession that all of DC is involved in a sex trafficking cabal to pick Matt focking Gaetz to be the face of legal matters is great shtick. Bravo! I bet you said the same shite about Julian Assange. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 1,444 Posted November 14 44 minutes ago, thegeneral said: For a party whose fringe has a very vocal obsession that all of DC is involved in a sex trafficking cabal to pick Matt focking Gaetz to be the face of legal matters is great shtick. Bravo! I don’t know much about Gaetz, but based on the liberal tears he seems to be a great choice. I was hoping for Ted Cruz, but we cannot lose him in the Senate. Also, my sources are saying he will be on short list when Sotomayor goes. Win win. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,254 Posted November 14 On to more important things 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,254 Posted November 14 4 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: I don’t know much about Gaetz, but based on the liberal tears he seems to be a great choice. I was hoping for Ted Cruz, but we cannot lose him in the Senate. Also, my sources are saying he will be on short list when Sotomayor goes. Win win. Wait until today’s announcement drops. So much winning! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 2,500 Posted November 14 27 minutes ago, HellToupee said: I bet you said the same shite about Julian Assange. I’m not following. Just commenting how absurd a choice Gaetz is. Great writing for the Trump sitcom people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 1,785 Posted November 14 2 hours ago, The Real timschochet said: Dude I got it before. It doesn’t change the fact that this is probably the most embarrassing appointment in political history which is saying a lot. The reporting this morning is that it has no chance of actually going through, but of THAT I’m not so sure. One should never underestimate the capacity of Republican senators to make total fools of themselves in order to show fealty to Trump. Maybe this nomination is by way of making the nominations of Tulsi, Pete Hegseth, and Kristi Noem seem normal by comparison. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 2,500 Posted November 14 1 hour ago, Tree of Knowledge said: I don’t know much about Gaetz, but based on the liberal tears he seems to be a great choice. I was hoping for Ted Cruz, but we cannot lose him in the Senate. Also, my sources are saying he will be on short list when Sotomayor goes. Win win. You should look into him. He’s a real peach. He’s also one of Trump’s level one ballwashers so that was a savvy move on his part. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 1,658 Posted November 14 https://x.com/AaronParnas/status/1857097056864612756 BREAKING: The attorney for the teenager at the center of the Matt Gaetz allegations calls on the House Ethics Committee to release the report against Gaetz and says there are witnesses. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,164 Posted November 14 1 minute ago, squistion said: https://x.com/AaronParnas/status/1857097056864612756 BREAKING: The attorney for the teenager at the center of the Matt Gaetz allegations calls on the House Ethics Committee to release the report against Gaetz and says there are witnesses. Yes. All for it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,254 Posted November 14 Time for Trump to announce he’s going to declassify the senate misconduct payments and fully release every name 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 5,232 Posted November 14 3 hours ago, Strike said: Horrible. You're such a horrible poster. Yeah I’m horrible because I point out your total hypocrisy. About 10 years ago I made an uninformed comment about Polanski, for which I’ve apologized several times. You’ve brought up dozens of times since then, behaving like a total a$$hole. You’ve followed me from thread to thread doing it for years. Such a jerk. Now your hero nominates a dude for attorney general who has done the exact same thing as Polanski. Probably worse. And you’ve got nothing to say about it. That’s why you’re a hypocrite and a moron. It would be better for you if you simply acknowledged it and moved on with your life. There’s always room for self-realization and improvement, even for you. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites