New York judge finds Donald Trump liable for fraud

[Fnord 1,664]

11 hours ago, HellToupee said:

I will never understand the loyalty and defense of Ukraine first

 

 

I will never understand how Donald Trump turned people that loved America into supporters of authoritarian regimes invading democracies.

[seafoam1 2,525]

49 minutes ago, Fnord said:

I will never understand 

That's the understatement of the year, peanut. 

[Mike Honcho 4,729]

Here's some help for those who think you can commit fraud, but if nobody complains, it's okay.

 

[Pimpadeaux 2,403]

25 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Here's some help for those who think you can commit fraud, but if nobody complains, it's okay.

 

This is focking great. Clownzo is going to wind up penniless, up to his fat orange ass in debt and in house arrest or prison. Going to be a great day for America!

[KSB2424 3,100]

Unbelievable 

https://x.com/collinrugg/status/1710408875315507206?s=46&t=r0y3bJ1CDXchoYAztDxmqw

[Reality 3,043]

What a fkn joke this entire thing is. Embarrassing.

Liberals are absolutely shameless.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

2 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Here's some help for those who think you can commit fraud, but if nobody complains, it's okay.

 

Overturned by the appellate court. Lol. Get  used to it snowflakes. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

2 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

This is focking great. Clownzo is going to wind up penniless, up to his fat orange ass in debt and in house arrest or prison. Going to be a great day for America!

Sorry Charlie, Lucy got you again.  

[Mike Honcho 4,729]

2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Overturned by the appellate court. Lol. Get  used to it snowflakes. 

 

Quote

 

An appeals judge Friday rejected Donald Trump’s bid to halt his $250 million civil fraud trial — a request that the New York Attorney General’s Office had warned would “sow chaos” if granted.

The judge did temporarily suspend yanking Trump’s business licenses, but the state had already agreed to the move.

 

I don't think your reading comprehension is a laughing matter. 

[jonmx 2,195]

4 hours ago, Reality said:

What a fkn joke this entire thing is. Embarrassing.

Liberals are absolutely shameless.

Don't insult liberalism.  There is nothing liberal about these fuking fascist bastards. 

[jonmx 2,195]

5 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Here's some help for those who think you can commit fraud, but if nobody complains, it's okay.

 

Fraud my ass.  Trump's value of his property is within a reasonable amount of being accurate based on compariables in the area.  The judge's value is a fantasy value which is based on a tax assess.ent and not market value.  Does that make the judge guilty of fraud?   That ass clown lawyer has never got a legal arguement correct in his life.   He is just a corrupt ass-kissing lawyer for the deep state which YouTube has feverishly been promoting for years. 

[squistion 1,655]

 

[RLLD 3,928]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

 

Sick....repugnant.....a sad statement on who we have become.  Had they simplify replicated what liberals did to judges I would be less critical

[BeachGuy23 642]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Sick....repugnant.....a sad statement on who we have become.  Had they simplify replicated what liberals did to judges I would be less critical

You really should have stopped at your first sentence.  You always always always have to somehow bring up that in your world liberals are the devil.

I think this sucks no matter who the judge or public official or anyone is.  Whomever does this should spend years in prison. 

I won't qualify this like some do. 

[The Real timschochet 5,232]

Trump could gain a little of my respect this morning by immediately condemning this. Thats what anyone with even the slightest moral rectitude would do. Let’s see if he does. 

[RLLD 3,928]

1 minute ago, BeachGuy23 said:

You really should have stopped at your first sentence.  You always always always have to somehow bring up that in your world liberals are the devil.

I think this sucks no matter who the judge or public official or anyone is.  Whomever does this should spend years in prison. 

I won't qualify this like some do. 

Not at all.

If you wonder how we got here, we started with what was done to judges prior....and later....we might see even worse unless this situation is dealt with and people are punished.

No qualification.  But a note, when people behave badly and are not held to account, the bar of behavior moves....a point seemingly lost on liberal minds. 

[squistion 1,655]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

Trump could gain a little of my respect this morning by immediately condemning this. Thats what anyone with even the slightest moral rectitude would do. Let’s see if he does. 

Don't hold your breath. Wasn't he asked the other day if he would condemn violence by his supporters and he just walked out without answering the question?

[The Real timschochet 5,232]

Just now, squistion said:

Don't hold your breath. Wasn't he asked the other day if he would condemn violence by his supporters and he just walked out without answering the question?

I’m aware. And I’m not holding my breath. 

[squistion 1,655]

 

[The Real timschochet 5,232]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Not at all.

If you wonder how we got here, we started with what was done to judges prior....and later....we might see even worse unless this situation is dealt with and people are punished.

No qualification.  But a note, when people behave badly and are not held to account, the bar of behavior moves....a point seemingly lost on liberal minds. 

I challenge your implication that the threat of violence as a means to achieve political ends is an idea to be blamed on liberals as a group. Or conservatives as a group, for that matter. It’s not a question of liberal vs conservative ideology. It’s extremism and the majority of both liberals and conservatives in our country reject it unequivocally.

That being said there are individuals on both sides who either excuse such actions or openly welcome them, and they deserve our condemnation. The most prominent of these, in recent years, is Donald Trump. If you want me to list Democrats as well I can do, starting with the repugnant Maxine Waters. But no Democrat that has done this has anywhere near the prominence of Trump, who is likely to be the Republican nominee for President. 

[RLLD 3,928]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

I challenge your implication that the threat of violence as a means to achieve political ends is an idea to be blamed on liberals as a group. Or conservatives as a group, for that matter. It’s not a question of liberal vs conservative ideology. It’s extremism and the majority of both liberals and conservatives in our country reject it unequivocally.

That being said there are individuals on both sides who either excuse such actions or openly welcome them, and they deserve our condemnation. The most prominent of these, in recent years, is Donald Trump. If you want me to list Democrats as well I can do, starting with the repugnant Maxine Waters. But no Democrat that has done this has anywhere near the prominence of Trump, who is likely to be the Republican nominee for President. 

Understood.

My assertion is basic.  You do not have January 6th if you do not have BLM rioting.  You do not have this current act toward a judge if you do not have people threatening SCOTUS judges outside of their homes.  You do not have Democrat politicians being "swatted" if you do not have Republican's facing it first.   Hell, you do not have a SCOTUS that overturns abortion if Harry reid does not eliminate the filibuster.

I mean, how long before some Republican retahd pulls a fire alarm during a vote? Right?

I go back to a central tenant.   The inclination of liberals to cross lines in order to fight for power has consequences, and perhaps there is not a realization of this.....   My suggestion is stop pretending your are the arbiters of morality, and that this role allows to you BE the thing you say you oppose

 

[BeachGuy23 642]

3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Understood.

My assertion is basic.  You do not have January 6th if you do not have BLM rioting.  You do not have this current act toward a judge if you do not have people threatening SCOTUS judges outside of their homes.  You do not have Democrat politicians being "swatted" if you do not have Republican's facing it first.   Hell, you do not have a SCOTUS that overturns abortion if Harry reid does not eliminate the filibuster.

I mean, how long before some Republican retahd pulls a fire alarm during a vote? Right?

I go back to a central tenant.   The inclination of liberals to cross lines in order to fight for power has consequences, and perhaps there is not a realization of this.....   My suggestion is stop pretending your are the arbiters of morality, and that this role allows to you BE the thing you say you oppose

 

You have got to be kidding.  No January 6th without blm?  There have been riots in this country since we became a country friend.  To connect the two is the height of gaslighting.

And the liberal who threatened the scotus judge was the first to threaten a public official?  More gaslighting.  I won't even dignify your swatting comment it's so absurd.

The only thing you have that even remotely correct is the harry reid ending the filibuster.  That was short sighted and bit the dems in the butt.

[RLLD 3,928]

2 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

You have got to be kidding.  No January 6th without blm?  There have been riots in this country since we became a country friend.  To connect the two is the height of gaslighting.

And the liberal who threatened the scotus judge was the first to threaten a public official?  More gaslighting.  I won't even dignify your swatting comment it's so absurd.

The only thing you have that even remotely correct is the harry reid ending the filibuster.  That was short sighted and bit the dems in the butt.

Not kidding.  And that you are unwilling to recognize this brings my point home. People are people. When the rioting transpired, "I" immediately lamented that there would likely be a commensurate action from the right.  This is simple stuff.....

No threatening of a public official is permissible, but perhaps I can take heart that if it should arise that a liberal judge is threatened we can potentially see some action.

Everything I said was correct.  People remain what they have always been, and they will act out.  I predict now, that at some point there WILL be a republican who takes some action akin to that fire alarm stunt to clear a room or building when it arises that something is happening THEY do not like.....and where did they get the idea?   As mentioned above, from a liberal believing they were the moral arbiters.....so nothing they do it wrong....

[BeachGuy23 642]

5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Not kidding.  And that you are unwilling to recognize this brings my point home. People are people. When the rioting transpired, "I" immediately lamented that there would likely be a commensurate action from the right.  This is simple stuff.....

No threatening of a public official is permissible, but perhaps I can take heart that if it should arise that a liberal judge is threatened we can potentially see some action.

Everything I said was correct.  People remain what they have always been, and they will act out.  I predict now, that at some point there WILL be a republican who takes some action akin to that fire alarm stunt to clear a room or building when it arises that something is happening THEY do not like.....and where did they get the idea?   As mentioned above, from a liberal believing they were the moral arbiters.....so nothing they do it wrong....

What an odd way you have of viewing the world.  You attribute everything wrong and bad with our country with liberals.  Only liberals rioted before Jan 6th?  Wow, that's a whole lot riots pre-2020 you're leaving out.  Heck, cities riot when their sports teams win.  Over tons of other issues.

But all riots are done by liberals.  Got it.

And surely Obama was never threatened during his campaign...just gas lighting plain and simple. 

[RLLD 3,928]

2 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

What an odd way you have of viewing the world.  You attribute everything wrong and bad with our country with liberals.  Only liberals rioted before Jan 6th?  Wow, that's a whole lot riots pre-2020 you're leaving out.  Heck, cities riot when their sports teams win.  Over tons of other issues.

But all riots are done by liberals.  Got it.

And surely Obama was never threatened during his campaign...just gas lighting plain and simple. 

I  concede this point.  Though back in the early 2000's I attributed mostly to conservatives.   Because at that time they were the ones screwing up the most.   So while your assertion remains true, it can also be easily refuted by my posting, where I hold wrong accountable.....irrespective of political ideology.  Perhaps the reason I am so critical at this point is that the media is complicit, instead of holding power accountable....and THAT is discomforting. 

Again, the permissiveness of the BLM riots was destined to result in something similar happening again. I said as much at the time...and was proven right, yet again....because human nature is not unknown.

The allowance for violence and evil for some because they have the right ideology behind them, is a slippery slope that WILL lead to similar behaviors coming from the ideological opposite.....its not complex.

[The Psychic Observer 297]

7 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

What an odd way you have of viewing the world.  You attribute everything wrong and bad with our country with liberals.  Only liberals rioted before Jan 6th?  Wow, that's a whole lot riots pre-2020 you're leaving out.  Heck, cities riot when their sports teams win.  Over tons of other issues.

But all riots are done by liberals.  Got it.

And surely Obama was never threatened during his campaign...just gas lighting plain and simple. 

Warped cultist brains are scary.

[jerryskids 6,166]

30 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

What an odd way you have of viewing the world.  You attribute everything wrong and bad with our country with liberals.  Only liberals rioted before Jan 6th?  Wow, that's a whole lot riots pre-2020 you're leaving out.  Heck, cities riot when their sports teams win.  Over tons of other issues.

But all riots are done by liberals.  Got it.

And surely Obama was never threatened during his campaign...just gas lighting plain and simple. 

Sure, riots existed, but what changed with the Summer of Love is that governments did nothing to stop them.  The American people learned a lesson:  if you don't like things, feel free to riot and we'll just let you do whatever you want.  Take over a portion of a major city?  Sure, why not?$#@!  

Where the 1/6 folks erred was that the lesson was SUPPOSED to be that rioters can do whatever they want as long as it registers higher on the intersectionality scale.

[squistion 1,655]

44 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Sure, riots existed, but what changed with the Summer of Love is that governments did nothing to stop them.  The American people learned a lesson:  if you don't like things, feel free to riot and we'll just let you do whatever you want.  Take over a portion of a major city?  Sure, why not?$#@!  

Where the 1/6 folks erred was that the lesson was SUPPOSED to be that rioters can do whatever they want as long as it registers higher on the intersectionality scale.

That isn't true. It was documented in another thread the number of arrests made of those who participated in the riots.