Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
The Real timschochet

Jasmine Crockett tells it like it is

Recommended Posts

Need more of her, as much exposure as possible.  I appreciate that she has embraced being the embodiment of a stereotype. Keep it coming. She needs to be on the debate stage for 2028.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/11/2024 at 7:13 PM, The Real timschochet said:

She is BRINGING IT! 

From her jail cell 😂 

And of course she's your favorite DEI 🌈 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

This moron will be defended by the board retards. I mean lefties 

Tims favorite house rep

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/11/2024 at 7:32 PM, The Real timschochet said:

Prior to being elected to Congress, as a lawyer Crockett performed pro bono work for Black Lives Matter activists wrongfully arrested during the George Floyd protests. 
 

 

"Wrongfully". 😆

You are so freaking dumb.

I mean....

"Jan 6!!! :cry:.    george floyd riots. :banana:" -timmy

Time for you to pack it in fat boy. You are disgusting. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She called Gov. Abbott “Hot Wheels”.  Real nice. She’s a congresswoman.  Makes MTG look good. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

She called Gov. Abbott “Hot Wheels”.  Real nice. She’s a congresswoman.  Makes MTG look good. 

That nickname is pretty kind compared to what that fool deserves. 
Jasmine is about 1000 times smarter than Marjorie but other than that I can see the comparison. Well not really. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jesus, what a piece of shlt this chick is. Not surprised by those here supporting this garbage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And her weave is terrible. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

She called Gov. Abbott “Hot Wheels”.  Real nice. She’s a congresswoman.  Makes MTG look good. 

She said it at The Human Rights Campaign .

 

remember when do-gooders were claiming that Donald mocked a disabled person 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She shouldn't have said that about Gov. Abbott and really should be punished for it in some way- be that censure or whatnot. 

Of course Trump shouldn't have mocked a disabled reporter but the MAGA mooks here cheered that like crazy..

Basically civility is dead in politics and the whole enterprise is worse for it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please--- Please----Please........make this woman the face of your party.  PLEASE......:headbanger: :clap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

That nickname is pretty kind compared to what that fool deserves. 
Jasmine is about 1000 times smarter than Marjorie but other than that I can see the comparison. Well not really. 

"It's okay when my side does the same thing we accuse the other side of doing because it's my side!  I'll always make excuses for my team!"

Fixed your post.  :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Please--- Please----Please........make this woman the face of your party.  PLEASE......:headbanger: :clap:

I doubt she's the face of the party in any way in 2028. 

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

"It's okay when my side does the same thing we accuse the other side of doing because it's my side!  I'll always make excuses for my team!"

Fixed your post.  :thumbsup:

I know you hate Tim but you know this isn't exclusive to him and the MAGA mooks here do the exact same thing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sean Mooney said:

I doubt she's the face of the party in any way in 2028. 

I know you hate Tim but you know this isn't exclusive to him and the MAGA mooks here do the exact same thing. 

God I hope you are wrong.   Republicans need to back the fock off of her, and let her cook.   She will pay dividends later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RLLD said:

God I hope you are wrong.   Republicans need to back the fock off of her, and let her cook.   She will pay dividends later.

So she is the person the right are going to make the big bad for the next 4 years? Is this something Gutfield said?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She’s not going to be the face of the Democratic Party. They have a vast and deep bench full of moderate,  normal candidates.  They aren’t the freak show that is portrayed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

So she is the person the right are going to make the big bad for the next 4 years? Is this something Gutfield said?

NO!   They should say nothing at all, let her be.....she is perfect just the way she is.....they should say nothing at all.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

That nickname is pretty kind compared to what that fool deserves. 
Jasmine is about 1000 times smarter than Marjorie but other than that I can see the comparison. Well not really. 

You notice that Dems don`t say the word "tolerance" much anymore.  They mock people looks, health conditions as part of their schtick now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

She shouldn't have said that about Gov. Abbott and really should be punished for it in some way- be that censure or whatnot. 

Of course Trump shouldn't have mocked a disabled reporter but the MAGA mooks here cheered that like crazy..

Basically civility is dead in politics and the whole enterprise is worse for it. 

They didn't cheer it, but they tried to spin it along the lines of "Don't believe your lying eyes" and he had done that before to others who weren't disabled (although the clips they showed were completely unconvincing). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, RLLD said:

NO!   They should say nothing at all, let her be.....she is perfect just the way she is.....they should say nothing at all.....

And of course I looked online and saw Gutfield said this:

"I want to see way more of Jasmine Crockett. I want to see her everywhere. I think she is the perfect face of the modern Democratic party."

So you are taking your cues from Greg Gutfield?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

And of course I looked online and saw Gutfield said this:

"I want to see way more of Jasmine Crockett. I want to see her everywhere. I think she is the perfect face of the modern Democratic party."

So you are taking your cues from Greg Gutfield?

So then, using your model, if I can find something you have said which echoes say.....a Hamas terrorist......I can then equate YOU....with THEM?  Is that how our logic is going to work here?

 

Wait a minute....didnt you just use Gutfeld to suggest she should be some villain?  You need to decide what you believe here....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RLLD said:

So then, using your model, if I can find something you have said which echoes say.....a Hamas terrorist......I can then equate YOU....with THEM?  Is that how our logic is going to work here?

 

Wait a minute....didnt you just use Gutfeld to suggest she should be some villain?  You need to decide what you believe here....

What is your problem with answering a simple question? I don't care if you want to parrot Gutfield. He's a popular figure on the right. MAGA mooks here parrot far less popular people on the right. He is suggesting she is the face of the modern party. You are suggesting they should run her as the party face because "she will pay dividends later..."

Sure- if you can find me parroting a Hamas terrorist then go ahead and equate me with them. 

It's okay you got got. Just admit and move on. I think you will find very little will change by just admitting the truth. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

What is your problem with answering a simple question? I don't care if you want to parrot Gutfield. He's a popular figure on the right. MAGA mooks here parrot far less popular people on the right. He is suggesting she is the face of the modern party. You are suggesting they should run her as the party face because "she will pay dividends later..."

Sure- if you can find me parroting a Hamas terrorist then go ahead and equate me with them. 

It's okay you got got. Just admit and move on. I think you will find very little will change by just admitting the truth. 

My problem is your deflection away from my statement toward someone elses.  This "associative" game liberals like to play is boring. So inviting me to join it, become you in essence is beneath me.

MY position remains, let it be Crockett, let is be AOC....pick one of the other unabashed idiots....it helps the people of America to have these people on full display, so the Democrat party is denied power.  That is all that matters....keeping the people who harm us from power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

This is a false narrative: the “Hot Wheels” thing had nothing to do with Abbot’s disability. It was about his moving refugees to other states. That was clear in  the context of her comments. 
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/rep-jasmine-crockett-defends-governor-hot-wheels-comments/story?id=120167133

 

You finally got your marching orders to parrot 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

This is a false narrative: the “Hot Wheels” thing had nothing to do with Abbot’s disability. It was about his moving refugees to other states. That was clear in  the context of her comments. 
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/rep-jasmine-crockett-defends-governor-hot-wheels-comments/story?id=120167133

If so,  then it was an unfortunate choice of words on her part. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RLLD said:

My problem is your deflection away from my statement toward someone elses.  This "associative" game liberals like to play is boring. So inviting me to join it, become you in essence is beneath me.

MY position remains, let it be Crockett, let is be AOC....pick one of the other unabashed idiots....it helps the people of America to have these people on full display, so the Democrat party is denied power.  That is all that matters....keeping the people who harm us from power.

Right now we would be way better off and much safer from harm if either of these two ladies you call idiots were in power- compared to the clowns who are in there at the moment. 
Are you calling for Hegseth to resign this morning? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Right now we would be way better off and much safer from harm if either of these two ladies you call idiots were in power- compared to the clowns who are in there at the moment. 
Are you calling for Hegseth to resign this morning? 

We have avoided the harm that was initiated by the Biden admin, and would have been exacerbated by any other Dem that followed.  Thank god Trump is at least trying to fix things in this nation.

It would be hypocritical of me to demand Hegseth resign when I did not make any such demand for Milley, under whose leadership people actually died.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

We have avoided the harm that was initiated by the Biden admin, and would have been exacerbated by any other Dem that followed.  Thank god Trump is at least trying to fix things in this nation.

It would be hypocritical of me to demand Hegseth resign when I did not make any such demand for Milley, under whose leadership people actually died.

But Milley, who was one of the best in that position that this country has ever had, never lied to the American people. Unlike Hegseth he is a man of honor. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

No, I read what she said, in context. 

STFU fool

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

But Milley, who was one of the best in that position that this country has ever had

Um what? You need to explain your work here. Why the gross hyperbole 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

My problem is your deflection away from my statement toward someone elses.  This "associative" game liberals like to play is boring. So inviting me to join it, become you in essence is beneath me.

MY position remains, let it be Crockett, let is be AOC....pick one of the other unabashed idiots....it helps the people of America to have these people on full display, so the Democrat party is denied power.  That is all that matters....keeping the people who harm us from power.

I'm not deflecting. Let's go to the replay:

Quote

 

RLLD: "Please--- Please----Please........make this woman the face of your party.  PLEASE......:headbanger: :clap:"

Me: "I doubt she's the face of the party in any way in 2028."

RLLD: "God I hope you are wrong.   Republicans need to back the fock off of her, and let her cook.   She will pay dividends later."

Me: "So she is the person the right are going to make the big bad for the next 4 years? Is this something Gutfield said?" (NOTE- I never said YOU were going to do this personally.)

RLLD: "NO!   They should say nothing at all, let her be.....she is perfect just the way she is.....they should say nothing at all....."

Me: "And of course I looked online and saw Gutfield said this:

"I want to see way more of Jasmine Crockett. I want to see her everywhere. I think she is the perfect face of the modern Democratic party."

So you are taking your cues from Greg Gutfield?"

RLLD: "So then, using your model, if I can find something you have said which echoes say.....a Hamas terrorist......I can then equate YOU....with THEM?  Is that how our logic is going to work here?

Wait a minute....didnt you just use Gutfeld to suggest she should be some villain?  You need to decide what you believe here....

Me: "What is your problem with answering a simple question? I don't care if you want to parrot Gutfield. He's a popular figure on the right. MAGA mooks here parrot far less popular people on the right. He is suggesting she is the face of the modern party. You are suggesting they should run her as the party face because "she will pay dividends later..."

Sure- if you can find me parroting a Hamas terrorist then go ahead and equate me with them. 

It's okay you got got. Just admit and move on. I think you will find very little will change by just admitting the truth. 

RLLD: "My problem is your deflection away from my statement toward someone elses.  This "associative" game liberals like to play is boring. So inviting me to join it, become you in essence is beneath me.

MY position remains, let it be Crockett, let is be AOC....pick one of the other unabashed idiots....it helps the people of America to have these people on full display, so the Democrat party is denied power.  That is all that matters....keeping the people who harm us from power."

 

So:

1.) You clearly jumped in to say you want her at the face of the party because you think she harms them and your side wins.

2.) I asked if this was going to be the big bad now for the next 4 years (which is what politics is- position someone on the other side as the big bad)

3.) You said- no let her go and she will pay dividends.

4.) I asked if Gutfield said this (which was just a name I threw out there) and then found a video from The Five where he is basically saying the same thing as you- put her up front because it will hurt the Democrats.

5.) You responded with Can I compare you to a Hamas terrorist- and then said that I'm deflecting. 

6.) Then you added an AOC comment at the end so you can now fall back on that and pretend like you meant that from the start when it's clear you didn't. 

7.) It's okay man- just admit you got caught. It's fine if you want to parrot the political wisdom of Greg Gutfield. But own it. You already turn to YouTube financial experts for economy advice- Gutfield is quite a few steps up from guys in their basements with skeletons in the background. Gutfield at least appears on two highly rated shows. 

 
 
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

But Milley, who was one of the best in that position that this country has ever had, never lied to the American people. Unlike Hegseth he is a man of honor. 

Perhaps if you shared my experiences in a combat zone, or perhaps if you were related to those who perished, your opinion of Milley might be a little different.  Or, perhaps if Milley had not elevated pointless social agendas above military effectiveness....who knows.....certainly I am aware of better leadership from the past......but your opinion is yours......mine is mine

People died, it was avoidable, YOU.....certainly seem willing to now hold Hegseth to account.....which is great, ALL leaders should be held to account....well... perhaps those with whom you disagree do?:dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

STFU fool

No. You don’t get to have it both ways. There is no double standard here. She doesn’t deserve to be condemned for attacking the handicapped; Trump does. What’s more this entire story is a trumped up distraction from the scandal of Hegseth and others shamefully lying. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

This is a false narrative: the “Hot Wheels” thing had nothing to do with Abbot’s disability. It was about his moving refugees to other states. That was clear in  the context of her comments. 
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/rep-jasmine-crockett-defends-governor-hot-wheels-comments/story?id=120167133

 

Look at the very least you can admit she could've picked her words more carefully. It's silly politicians in 2025 don't know people will just soundbite things. Even if she wasn't referring to his condition (and I think she was to some degree) she has to know it will get painted that way. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

Look at the very least you can admit she could've picked her words more carefully. It's silly politicians in 2025 don't know people will just soundbite things. Even if she wasn't referring to his condition (and I think she was to some degree) she has to know it will get painted that way. 

Sure. It was an unfortunate use of words. But it wasn’t deliberate and comparing it to the cruelty that Trump displayed with the journalist, for which these same people have repeatedly given him a pass for years, is outrageous. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×