Trump's NY Election Interference Trial - Trump is found guilty on all 34 counts

[torridjoe 48]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Sorry, pal.  I think it's best you disappear for another 12 years.  Your first day back and you've already been handed your a$$ and found to be not ready.  You would think after such a long absence you would be training yourself, but apparently not. 

Well, better luck next time when we see you in 2036. 

So uncle? 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,410]

2 minutes ago, torridjoe said:

So uncle? 

i mean, you tried your best.  You really did but it just wasn't good enough.  That's okay.  Not everyone can succeed in online forums.  It's just not your thing.

When you finally come back from your safe space in 2036, we'll see if you'll be ready then.  As for now - not so much.

Also, probably should learn math while you're away again.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

Wait, people still think Biden got 81 million votes? Holy shitt.  Lol

[torridjoe 48]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

i mean, you tried your best.  You really did but it just wasn't good enough.  That's okay.  Not everyone can succeed in online forums.  It's just not your thing.

When you finally come back from your safe space in 2036, we'll see if you'll be ready then.  As for now - not so much.

Also, probably should learn math while you're away again.

The avoidance with you is thick. 

[torridjoe 48]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Wait, people still think Biden got 81 million votes? Holy shitt.  Lol

As opposed to what? 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,410]

Just now, torridjoe said:

The avoidance with you is thick. 

Swing and a miss!   

[MDC 6,754]

Biden probably only got 50 or 60 million votes. The rest voted for “not Trump.”  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

1 minute ago, torridjoe said:

As opposed to what? 

As opposed to not 81 million. Come on man. You know that did not happen. 

[torridjoe 48]

6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

As opposed to not 81 million. Come on man. You know that did not happen. 

How do I know that? I’d say we can be even more sure about those results than previous elections; no POTUS result was ever more heavily scrutinized or litigated. And it was a clean sheet for the fans of secure elections. 

[GutterBoy 2,897]

On 6/1/2024 at 11:48 AM, Beaker15 said:

You can tell a lot about a father by his kids.  His kids are so well spoken and intelligent impressive people.

He's tall, and he's good looking, and he's tall, and he's applied to college

Great father

[Maximum Overkill 1,369]

7 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

He's tall, and he's good looking, and he's tall, and he's applied to college

Great father

As opposed to Joe Biden who showered with his daughter and ROUTINELY molests little girls?? 

PEDOCRAT LOGIC???  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

18 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

As opposed to Joe Biden who showered with his daughter and ROUTINELY molests little girls?? 

PEDOCRAT LOGIC???  

Bidens daughter says she was molested as a child and her father has no interest in finding out who did it. Most decent men would search to the ends of the earth to find out. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,369]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Bidens daughter says she was molested as a child and her father has no interest in finding out who did it. Most decent men would search to the ends of the earth to find out. 

Somebody would DIE if that were my Kid. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Somebody would DIE if that were my Kid. 

The guy has the FBI at his disposal and does nothing. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,369]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The guy has the FBI at his disposal and does nothing. 

And then you have normal Pedocrats like GUTTERBOY who are obviously Pro-Pedo and don't dare break the narratives. That would be bad for business  

[nobody 2,461]

Torridjoe playing billy badass is adorable.

[Beaker15 200]

46 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

He's tall, and he's good looking, and he's tall, and he's applied to college

Great father

Agreed

[Engorgeous George 1,774]

2 hours ago, torridjoe said:

Lol right because once a law is passed everyone follows and enforces it unanimously, despite a vigorous culture against it. 

I would suggest that every defense attorney and every public defender learned to shout "Batson!" every time they orgasmed and every time any person of color was struck from a jury beginning in 1986.  In my experience the courts were stringent in enforcing Batson challenges.  They seemed to err on the side of caution.

 

[Gepetto 1,192]

13 hours ago, torridjoe said:

Looks like the conservatives doing the weaponizing. Maybe don’t really on the moonies for your news. 

The conservatives accusations, if found to be true, implicates the Democrats of what should be considered election interference.

[The Real timschochet 5,232]

On the talk shows this morning the argument is that Merchan should have recused himself because he contributed to Joe Biden’s campaign. I had heard this before all over the place including this forum. What I didn’t know is that the “contribution” was $20 four years ago. 

Are you freaking kidding me with this???

[Engorgeous George 1,774]

12 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

On the talk shows this morning the argument is that Merchan should have recused himself because he contributed to Joe Biden’s campaign. I had heard this before all over the place including this forum. What I didn’t know is that the “contribution” was $20 four years ago. 

Are you freaking kidding me with this???

Model Code of Judicial Conduct (americanbar.org)

 

I would suggest any campaign contribution is imprudent for a sitting judge.  That his contribution was 4 years ago seems irrelevant as presidential campaigns are every four years so his donation was in the last campaign.  If this is brought up in the apeal it will nmot, in my estimation, be sufficient to overturn the verdict.  It will result in a mild admonition from the appellate court.  It may, however, begin to add color to Judge Merchan's other rulings, color those rulings do not need.

 

I do note that the model code is not binding on jurists.

 

CJC.pdf (nysba.org)  (The New York Code which is based on the model code but is fleshed out a bit with definitions and commentary).

 

I like my judges to be as pure appearing as Caesar's wife precisely so we don't devolve to these types of arguments.  I say as pure appearing as i understand Caesar's wife was a saucy tramp in reality while officially maintaining cecorum.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

Joe Biden is 0 for 3 raising kids and libtards want to make comparisons. Lol. 

[The Real timschochet 5,232]

26 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

Model Code of Judicial Conduct (americanbar.org)

 

I would suggest any campaign contribution is imprudent for a sitting judge.  That his contribution was 4 years ago seems irrelevant as presidential campaigns are every four years so his donation was in the last campaign.  If this is brought up in the apeal it will nmot, in my estimation, be sufficient to overturn the verdict.  It will result in a mild admonition from the appellate court.  It may, however, begin to add color to Judge Merchan's other rulings, color those rulings do not need.

 

I do note that the model code is not binding on jurists.

 

CJC.pdf (nysba.org)  (The New York Code which is based on the model code but is fleshed out a bit with definitions and commentary).

 

I like my judges to be as pure appearing as Caesar's wife precisely so we don't devolve to these types of arguments.  I say as pure appearing as i understand Caesar's wife was a saucy tramp in reality while officially maintaining cecorum.

$20??

Come on man. Unlike you I don’t have a law degree. But this seems lame to me. I also read that this was submitted to an ethics review board and they had no problem with it. 

[thegeneral 2,490]

30 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

Model Code of Judicial Conduct (americanbar.org)

 

I would suggest any campaign contribution is imprudent for a sitting judge.  That his contribution was 4 years ago seems irrelevant as presidential campaigns are every four years so his donation was in the last campaign.  If this is brought up in the apeal it will nmot, in my estimation, be sufficient to overturn the verdict.  It will result in a mild admonition from the appellate court.  It may, however, begin to add color to Judge Merchan's other rulings, color those rulings do not need.

 

I do note that the model code is not binding on jurists.

 

CJC.pdf (nysba.org)  (The New York Code which is based on the model code but is fleshed out a bit with definitions and commentary).

 

I like my judges to be as pure appearing as Caesar's wife precisely so we don't devolve to these types of arguments.  I say as pure appearing as i understand Caesar's wife was a saucy tramp in reality while officially maintaining cecorum.

What do the various rules say about accepting free vacations, rides on PJ’s to yachts, etc?

[squistion 1,655]

https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/1797341182135013561

Stormy Daniels on Trump:

"I think he should be sentenced to jail and some community service working for the less fortunate, or being the volunteer punching bag at a women's shelter."

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

21 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

$20??

Come on man. Unlike you I don’t have a law degree. But this seems lame to me. I also read that this was submitted to an ethics review board and they had no problem with it. 

If you’re making an issue of the amount then you don’t understand why it was done. Your naïveté is sad but understandable. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,410]

1 hour ago, nobody said:

Torridjoe playing billy badass is adorable.

He in the service.  Part of the 5th Keyboard Division.  Very scary group.. 

One thing that is 100% true is that iToughGuys who claim they are iToughGuys online are not tough guys.  Tough guys don't have to brag about how tough they are. 

[Engorgeous George 1,774]

1 hour ago, thegeneral said:

What do the various rules say about accepting free vacations, rides on PJ’s to yachts, etc?

The Supremes were not subject to a Code of Ethics but had they been i might guess such gifts would have been highly frowned upon.

[Maximum Overkill 1,369]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

Stormy Daniels on Trump:

SHES A WHOOORE!! 

SHE SUCKS D FOR A LIVING. WHO CARES WHAT SHE THINKS??? 

[GutterBoy 2,897]

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-supporters-try-doxx-jurors-violent-threats-conviction-rcna154882

Magas doxing jurors.  Saying they should be killed.What a bunch of disgusting criminals.

[Engorgeous George 1,774]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

$20??

Come on man. Unlike you I don’t have a law degree. But this seems lame to me. I also read that this was submitted to an ethics review board and they had no problem with it. 

The only clear line uis at don't do it at all.  Otherwise we now have to make value (literally) judgments.  I hzave not looked to see whether there was a ruling by the Ethics Board.  If there is a written ruling i bet they condemned giving any amount but found this amount low enough that they were not going to censure the past act but they would if it were repeated.

 

I bet even without a law degree you can find the ruling of the ethics board if you choose to look.  There is nothing terribly unique about a law degree.  Law school is nothing more than a three year reading comprehenson test.  My brother told me so. 

[squistion 1,655]

24 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

$20??

Come on man. Unlike you I don’t have a law degree. But this seems lame to me. I also read that this was submitted to an ethics review board and they had no problem with it. 

I don't get after why it was submitted to an ethics review board and they had no issue with it, that anyone would have a problem with it. 

[torridjoe 48]

2 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

He's tall, and he's good looking, and he's tall, and he's applied to college

Great father

Luckily someone fed him info on Barron before the interview. 

[Engorgeous George 1,774]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

$20??

Come on man. Unlike you I don’t have a law degree. But this seems lame to me. I also read that this was submitted to an ethics review board and they had no problem with it. 

The only clear line uis at don't do it at all.  Otherwise we now have to make value (literally) judgments.  I hzave not looked to see whether there was a ruling by the Ethics Board.  If there is a written ruling i bet they condemned giving any amount but found this amount low enough that they were not going to censure the past act but they would if it were repeated.

 

I bet even without a law degree you can find the ruling of the ethics board if you choose to look.  There is nothing terribly unique about a law degree.  Law school is nothing more than a three year reading comprehenson test.  My brother told me so. 

 

 

Dismissed with a caution.  Also looks like it was $15 not $20, with an additional $35 going to another democratic cause.  The actaul written opinion is not released unless it comes with a censure rather than a caution.

[5-Points 3,184]

3 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

He's tall, and he's good looking, and he's tall, and he's applied to college

Great father

Envy is one of the seven deadly sins. 

Amen.

Thanks

[torridjoe 48]

4 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

The only clear line uis at don't do it at all.  Otherwise we now have to make value (literally) judgments.  I hzave not looked to see whether there was a ruling by the Ethics Board.  If there is a written ruling i bet they condemned giving any amount but found this amount low enough that they were not going to censure the past act but they would if it were repeated.

 

I bet even without a law degree you can find the ruling of the ethics board if you choose to look.  There is nothing terribly unique about a law degree.  Law school is nothing more than a three year reading comprehenson test.  My brother told me so. 

 

 

Dismissed with a caution.  Also looks like it was $15 not $20, with an additional $35 going to another democratic cause.  The actaul written opinion is not released unless it comes with a censure rather than a caution.

It was dismissed twice. Once last year, once this. And all the “caution” means is “see if it becomes a pattern.” It’s not a thing. 

[thegeneral 2,490]

12 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

SHES A WHOOORE!! 

SHE SUCKS D FOR A LIVING. WHO CARES WHAT SHE THINKS??? 

Trump obviously. That’s why he paid her.

[Engorgeous George 1,774]

My take on the Judge's contributions is not to try to create the impresion I find it a heinous violation of Judicial ethics as i do not. My take is that I would prefer, in an historic and precedent setting trial that there not be these collateral issues.  The first time a past president and current front running candidate of a major party is put on trial for felonies I would prefer the jury be unquestionably unbiased, the same for the judge, and that the charges be clear and not based on a novel legal theory.  Of course the law is never so pristine in practice, never, but that would have been my preference and Judge Merchan could have gone a long way in removing these collateral issues.  I believe a model jurist would have.

[torridjoe 48]

2 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

Envy is one of the seven deadly sins. 

Amen.

Thanks

Who would we be possibly envious of? The broke ass felon? Or his trapped unfortunate son?

[Engorgeous George 1,774]

1 minute ago, torridjoe said:

It was dismissed twice. Once last year, once this. And all the “caution” means is “see if it becomes a pattern.” It’s not a thing. 

I am aware of what a caution means in this context.