Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

[Engorgeous George 1,702]

Grandpa refuses to give up the keys.  He drives just as good as ever.  He is the goodest driver in the family, just ask him.  It's not his fault that the tree jumped in front of his car while he was carefully and skillfully parking it across the sidewalk into the front lawn, on purpose. 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,414]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Could be upping his negotiation strength.  But the squad has stepped up and urged him to stay in, and he has been listening to them for years now. 

Dr. Jill when someone told her this plan. 

 

 

[TBayXXXVII 2,364]

1 hour ago, supermike80 said:

Yes..The GOP will 100% try to cover for Trump if that happens.  Believing otherwise is just stupid.

Now the media is a whole different story.

Sometimes the blind party loyalty is just absurd.  Regardless of the party involved, they want to gain power and keep power.  And thy will do what they can to make that happen.  Even if it means dancing on some lines when it comes to legality.  Neither party is immune to it and if you believe only one party would do it, you don't know sheet about politics.

The difference here was the media...They subscribed to it.  That absolutely would not happen if Trump were the President

Oh, I know they will... the leftist rhetoric for the last 9 years has been that the GOP would do anything to get rid of Trump.  Well, if they had a chance to do it, and didn't... that would mean that the left has been lying the whole time about the GOP, right?  I mean, they'd have a great chance to get rid of him and if they truly like Vance, there's no reason why they wouldn't 25th him and insert Vance.  That was my point.

[TBayXXXVII 2,364]

44 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Of course they will, are you kidding here?

The dude had an army of goobers attacking the Capitol building beating on cops and they all just fall in line because he controls a huge block of voters they need. 

 

Ok, so the left has been lying the whole time that the GOP would love to have a reason to get rid of Trump?

[iam90sbaby 2,284]

Trump survives an assassination attempt and gets the best photo op in political history, meanwhile Democrats are eating each other alive and calling for Biden to step down, we got this.

[The Real timschochet 5,113]

Well if Biden truly refuses to quit this is exactly what the Republicans want. It’s a mess. 
We’ll have to see what the weekend brings. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,364]

Let's just remember that 4 years ago, we were told that Biden would've just accepted the loss to Trump and went on his merry way.  Well, everyone wants Biden out and he's not going quietly.

[iam90sbaby 2,284]

19 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Sure. Or maybe it was MSNBC reporting what the NYT says. You decide. 

So much bullsh!t you can't even keep up with it anymore. LOL!

[thegeneral 2,438]

1 minute ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Ok, so the left has been lying the whole time that the GOP would love to have a reason to get rid of Trump?

The GOP will absolutely cover for Trump because they have the whole time. I gave you the mother of all examples

That’s just politics. 

[Beaker15 200]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

Well if Biden truly refuses to quit this is exactly what the Republicans want. It’s a mess. 
We’ll have to see what the weekend brings. 

Republicans don't give a what Biden does.  Trump will steamroll Biden or Kamala.

[TBayXXXVII 2,364]

6 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

The GOP will absolutely cover for Trump because they have the whole time. I gave you the mother of all examples

That’s just politics. 

That's no where near the mother of examples, lol... that's a copout b.s. example.  Trump lost the election at that point and the public thought everything about the election was crap.  The GOP knew that they had no chance to stop Trump's popularity, and why they didn't even try hard in the primaries to back Haley, because they knew she had no shot.  BUT, after Trump wins the election, that's all over.  The GOP has every incentive to help him win and then would have every incentive to get rid of him.  The left would have the greatest ally in an impeachment process, the GOP, if they truly wanted him out.  Trump can't run again, the GOP can have Vance in the White House, and no more Trump.  Right?  Sure, some would say that's political suicide, but let's be honest... all it will take is like a handful of Republicans who would be on their way out anyway, to side with the Communist party and boom, Trump is gone.  Those handful of Republican's would lose their re-election bids and go work for CNN or MSNBC and trash the GOP, the GOP would save face with the rest of the constituency and we move on.

[thegeneral 2,438]

10 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

That's no where near the mother of examples, lol... that's a copout b.s. example.  Trump lost the election at that point and the public thought everything about the election was crap.  The GOP knew that they had no chance to stop Trump's popularity, and why they didn't even try hard in the primaries to back Haley, because they knew she had no shot.  BUT, after Trump wins the election, that's all over.  The GOP has every incentive to help him win and then would have every incentive to get rid of him.  The left would have the greatest ally in an impeachment process, the GOP, if they truly wanted him out.  Trump can't run again, the GOP can have Vance in the White House, and no more Trump.  Right?  Sure, some would say that's political suicide, but let's be honest... all it will take is like a handful of Republicans who would be on their way out anyway, to side with the Communist party and boom, Trump is gone.  Those handful of Republican's would lose their re-election bids and go work for CNN or MSNBC and trash the GOP, the GOP would save face with the rest of the constituency and we move on.

A losing Republican Prez, law and order and all that, had a bunch of people attacking cops in his name at the Capitol building is like a Hollywood version of events akin to where the Prez has gone nuts and Liam Neeson has to take him out. Of course that would remove anyone from the world of US politics, right! And no…it didn’t. If people didn’t dump this POS after that they never will. He is correct, he could shoot someone in the face and it wouldn’t matter.

Sorry man this is delusional.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,007]

Let’s keep in mind that Kamala Harris was affiliated with the terrorists that were burning and looting cities during the 2020 DNC backed political riots. Also, she’s a who-re that sleeps with married men to get ahead. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,364]

13 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

A losing Republican Prez, law and order and all that, had a bunch of people attacking cops in his name at the Capitol building is like Hollywood version of events. Of course that would remove any from the world of US politics. And no…it didn’t. If people didn’t dump this POS after that they never will. He is correct, he could shoot someone in the face and it wouldn’t matter.

Sorry man this is delusional.

What's delusional is that you think the conservative populous is as demented as the liberal populous.  The conservative voters do not think that the handful of moron's was as big of an issue as the wacko's on your side of the aisle.  We all know and believe that the summer of 2020 was way worse and the liberals didn't just condone the activities, they supported it.

True or false, if Harris is picked to run on the Democrat side and she literally shoots Trump in the face, she gets more votes than Obama in 2008?  When you answer True, you can stop with the "it wouldn't matter" crap.

[thegeneral 2,438]

Just now, TBayXXXVII said:

What's delusional is that you think the conservative populous is as demented as the liberal populous.  The conservative voters do not think that the handful of moron's was as big of an issue as the wacko's on your side of the aisle.  We all know and believe that the summer of 2020 was way worse and the liberals didn't just condone the activities, they supported it.

True or false, if Harris is picked to run on the Democrat side and she literally shoots Trump in the face, she gets more votes than Obama in 2008?  When you answer True, you can stop with the "it wouldn't matter" crap.

Summer of 2020 was not lead by Joe Biden or any particular politician.

Look we are drifting away from the point I was responding too which was - If Trump wins and does anything in the next 4 years the GOP will line up behind him. They didn’t have to after Jan 6th, maybe some didn’t want to, but they all eventually did because if you didn’t you were gonzo.

He has you all by the short and curlies. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,364]

8 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Summer of 2020 was not lead by Joe Biden or any particular politician.

Look we are drifting away from the point I was responding too which was - If Trump wins and does anything in the next 4 years the GOP will line up behind him. They didn’t have to after Jan 6th, maybe some didn’t want to, but they all eventually did because if you didn’t you were gonzo.

He has you all by the short and curlies. 

I didn't say the lead it, I said they supported it.  You don't remember Harris and others saying that they'd donate money to gofundme's for people to use as bail money if they got arrested?  Short term memory, eh?

 

I never said the GOP wouldn't side with him... I said they would.  My point was that the Leftists in the media and DC have been telling people for years that the GOP would love to have a reason to get rid of Trump.  I said they were lying.  You seem to agree but don't want to say it.  After Trump wins, he has no leverage with the GOP anymore as he can no longer run again.  If the GOP really wanted to get rid of him, all they have to do is have a few Leftist activists concoct a reason to impeach him, like they did twice last time, and it will only take a couple people on the right to get rid of him.  It actually will be pretty easy.

 

Proving how delusional you are, I don't like Trump, he's an azzhat, but I like his policies.  If the GOP did 25th him, I wouldn't care too much.  In 2024, the worst people in the world, are involved in the DNC.

[Engorgeous George 1,702]

12 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Summer of 2020 was not lead by Joe Biden or any particular politician.

Look we are drifting away from the point I was responding too which was - If Trump wins and does anything in the next 4 years the GOP will line up behind him. They didn’t have to after Jan 6th, maybe some didn’t want to, but they all eventually did because if you didn’t you were gonzo.

He has you all by the short and curlies. 

 

[thegeneral 2,438]

5 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I didn't say the lead it, I said they supported it.  You don't remember Harris and others saying that they'd donate money to gofundme's for people to use as bail money if they got arrested?  Short term memory, eh?

 

I never said the GOP wouldn't side with him... I said they would.  My point was that the Leftists in the media and DC have been telling people for years that the GOP would love to have a reason to get rid of Trump.  I said they were lying.  You seem to agree but don't want to say it.  After Trump wins, he has no leverage with the GOP anymore as he can no longer run again.  If the GOP really wanted to get rid of him, all they have to do is have a few Leftist activists concoct a reason to impeach him, like they did twice last time, and it will only take a couple people on the right to get rid of him.  It actually will be pretty easy.

 

Proving how delusional you are, I don't like Trump, he's an azzhat, but I like his policies.  If the GOP did 25th him, I wouldn't care too much.  In 2024, the worst people in the world, are involved in the DNC.

I honestly have no clue what you are even talking about at this point.

If you think somehow Trump won’t have everyone covering for him if he were to win - fine. I disagree and think it’s clear they will do whatever he wants. Trump should have had no leverage after Jan 6th. You all could have picked anyone, he won.he controls the party. 

Not sure all this other shet you are adding in here

[thegeneral 2,438]

1 minute ago, Engorgeous George said:

 

Smooth jam

[The Real timschochet 5,113]

31 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Let’s keep in mind that Kamala Harris was affiliated with the terrorists that were burning and looting cities during the 2020 DNC backed political riots. Also, she’s a who-re that sleeps with married men to get ahead. 

Assuming she is the candidate I really hope this is campaign Trump runs against her. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,364]

7 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I honestly have no clue what you are even talking about at this point.

If you think somehow Trump won’t have everyone covering for him if he were to win - fine. I disagree and think it’s clear they will do whatever he wants. Trump should have had no leverage after Jan 6th. You all could have picked anyone, he won.he controls the party. 

Not sure all this other shet you are adding in here

I'll take this as you saying: "Ok, I was just looking for a reason to argue, can't find one, so I'll move on".

[Hardcore troubadour 14,007]

3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Assuming she is the candidate I really hope this is campaign Trump runs against her. 

I’ll pitch it to them. At least you acknowledge that what I say is true. 

[thegeneral 2,438]

4 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I'll take this as you saying: "Ok, I was just looking for a reason to argue, can't find one, so I'll move on".

  I was thinking the same. You said you agreed with my point then wandered off into paragraphs of other stuff.

[MDC 6,659]

25 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Assuming she is the candidate I really hope this is campaign Trump runs against her. 

He forgot DEI hire. All left leaning minorities are. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,007]

It’s been fine and a great strategy for the left and puzzies on the fence to talk about trumps sex life but Kamala’s would be off limits.  Got it. 

[Strike 4,679]

2 minutes ago, MDC said:

He forgot DEI hire. All left leaning minorities are. 

Not true but the fact that Biden promised to choose a minority makes her one.

[IGotWorms 3,916]

11 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It’s been fine and a great strategy for the left and puzzies on the fence to talk about trumps sex life but Kamala’s would be off limits.  Got it. 

I don’t think it’s so much “off limits” as it is of questionable relevance to today. But I fully expect MAGA will run with it anyway

[MDC 6,659]

15 minutes ago, Strike said:

Not true but the fact that Biden promised to choose a minority makes her one.

Name a left leaning minority politician who doesn’t get accused of being a DEI or affirmative action hire.

[Strike 4,679]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

Name a left leaning minority politician who doesn’t get accused of being a DEI or affirmative action hire.

Has nothing to do with whether Kameltoe IS one.  She is. 

[MDC 6,659]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

Has nothing to do with whether Kameltoe IS one.  She is. 

Oh well. You tried.  

[Dizkneelande 1,018]

4 minutes ago, MDC said:

Name a left leaning minority politician who doesn’t get accused of being a DEI or affirmative action hire.

Harry Reid, the former Senate majority leader, said race had been essential to Mr. Biden’s decision.

“I think he came to the conclusion that he should pick a Black woman,” Mr. Reid said. “They are our most loyal voters and I think that the Black women of America deserved a Black vice-presidential candidate.”

[Strike 4,679]

Just now, MDC said:

Oh well. You tried.  

Tried what?  I responded to your assertion that Kameltoe is not a DEI hire.  We know she is.  I don't care about other politicians in a thread about the state of the Presidential election.

[MDC 6,659]

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

Tried what?  I responded to your assertion that Kameltoe is not a DEI hire.  We know she is.  I don't care about other politicians in a thread about the state of the Presidential election.

I didn’t say Kamala isn’t a DEI hire. I said according to your ilk, every left leaning minority is.

Come up with one who don’t yet?

 

[Strike 4,679]

Just now, MDC said:

I didn’t say Kamala isn’t a DEI hire. I said according to your ilk, every left leaning minority is.

Come up with one who don’t yet?

 

So Kameltoe isnt a DEI hire but all other minority politicians are?  Ok, whatever you say ROFLMAO.

[MDC 6,659]

6 minutes ago, Strike said:

So Kameltoe isnt a DEI hire but all other minority politicians are?  Ok, whatever you say ROFLMAO.

You misunderstood: ALL left leaning minority politicians are DEI hires according to your ilk. As evidence, you can’t name one who isn’t.

Thanks for playing.  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,007]

7 minutes ago, MDC said:

You misunderstood: ALL left leaning minority politicians are DEI hires according to your ilk. As evidence, you can’t name one who isn’t.

Thanks for playing.  

Obama wasn’t.  You lose. 

[League Champion 1,790]

Where is Biden? Trump got shot and golfed the next day. Biden is missing in action, unable to fulfill his duties. Because of the sniffles. 

[Strike 4,679]

11 minutes ago, MDC said:

You misunderstood: ALL left leaning minority politicians are DEI hires according to your ilk. As evidence, you can’t name one who isn’t.

Thanks for playing.  

Man, this is when this bored just gets very tedious.  I shouldn't have to go through this detailed analysis but you're forcing me to.  No, I didn't misunderstand.  Your post, that I replied to, was in response to a post about how @The Real timschochet hopes the GOP campaigns against her in a certain way.  And you replied:

 

Quote

He forgot DEI hire. All left leaning minorities are. 

The clear meaning of your post is that they should ALSO campaign against her as a DEI hire.  You support that by saying ALL left leaning minority politicians are DEI hires.  I assume you mean to right leaning people.   You may have been trying to open the door to a discussion about all minority lefty politicians but I'm only concerned about Kameltoe.  So I responded accordingly, limiting my comment to Kameltoe.   Your subsequent posts make no logical sense.  Because Kameltoe IS part of that minority group you're talking about.  So, when I say Kameltoe is in fact a DEI hire that's a valid statement.   Either you dispute that she's a DEI hire, which really can't be done since Joe did in fact choose her because of her minority status, or the discussion should be over. 

For some reason you're fixated on expanding the pool of discussion to all minority candidates.  I'm not really interested in that discussion because this thread is about the Presidential election.  But, you'd be wrong anyways.  Most politicians are elected to their position.  That's by definition not a DEI hire.  So no, righties don't think ALL minority politicians are DEI hires.

 

 

[IGotWorms 3,916]

How is the former AG of the most populous state in the country and a US Senator a DEI hire?

[TBayXXXVII 2,364]

1 hour ago, thegeneral said:

  I was thinking the same. You said you agreed with my point then wandered off into paragraphs of other stuff.

You replied to me initially, did you not?  Thanks for playing.