Hopefully the end for Fani and her legal abuse

[Horseman 1,987]

On 6/9/2024 at 12:42 PM, GutterBoy said:

I grew up listening to hip hop dummy.

[RLLD 3,928]

Willis is an example of someone who should never be anywhere near a position of power.

[Strike 4,809]

Appeals court in Georgia just disqualified Fani from prosecuting Trump.  More lawfare bites the dust.

[Fireballer 2,599]

On 5/10/2024 at 9:25 AM, The Real timschochet said:

The appeal makes for a long delay but I suspect that they will uphold the judges decision. Probably will have a trial a year from now. 

Bullseye

[Fireballer 2,599]

On 5/10/2024 at 9:40 AM, Tree of Knowledge said:

Hopefully President Trump does not forget her after his triumphant return to Washington.  MAGA will expect her to be treated as a treasonous conspirator.  

[Horseman 1,987]

LOL

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

Winning. 

[jonmx 2,200]

On 5/10/2024 at 8:40 PM, jonmx said:

They will kick Fani off too.  The judges ruling made zero sense.  If there was misconduct, both of them were guilty.  The idea of kicking one off would eliminate the appearance of conflict is an impossible decision to rationally support.   The judge made a ruling to try to split the baby.

 

I could have written this ruling..  ...eventhough i was wrong on how the first judge would rule, the appeals court agreed with me and fixed the idiotic logic in the first ruling.  

The case is dead.  Another prosecuter will not touch this. 

[jonmx 2,200]

50 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Bullseye

Tim listens to all the legal experts on CNN who always give dishonest legal opinions.    He turns his brain off.

[Tree of Knowledge 1,433]

Next step is a blindfold and her menthols. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

Another DEI hire failed. Seems to be a trend.  

[Alias Detective 1,313]

On 5/10/2024 at 9:25 AM, The Real timschochet said:

The appeal makes for a long delay but I suspect that they will uphold the judges decision. Probably will have a trial a year from now. 

 

On 5/10/2024 at 7:25 PM, thegeneral said:

You thinking Biden will pardon him after he wins the rigged election

 

On 5/10/2024 at 9:09 PM, The Real timschochet said:

What exactly did she do wrong? Whats the misconduct? Is she not allowed to have a relationship with a co-worker? 

 

On 6/5/2024 at 11:31 PM, torridjoe said:

Because they are weak and stupid, yes. Nothing they’re more afraid of than a Black woman. Seriously. 

 

On 6/9/2024 at 10:20 AM, GutterBoy said:

 

Calling a successful, powerful black woman a skeezer and then calling other racist for pointing that out.  You guys aare clowns

Ooooooof!

[jonmx 2,200]

For those who get their news from the deep state propaganda channels, this is what Fani did wrong.

1.  Fani is not authorized to pass out contracts to whomever she wants.   They have contacting officials to make sure proper processes are followed.  Fani bypassed these channels to award over a million dollars to her lover.  

2.  Fani lied about her relationship with Wade.  This has nothing to do with sex. This has to do with a non-disclosed relationship to someone you are paying government money to.   It is even worse because Fani was also approving his billing.

This is not some technicality, this is a major breach of trust which not only violates ethical standards but violates the law.  A government employee can not just give huge government contracts to family and friends.  To prevent this kind of nepotism there are processes in place to prevent this kind of abuse.  Fani has to sign sworn statements every year disclosing any relationship which might cause a conflict of interest in the contracts the DA office pays.  Fani not only denied any such relationships, she bypassed the legal process in awarding the contract, and then went even further and approved his time and outrageous hourly rate.  Fani did three things that would get any government employee fired on the spot.  

[jonmx 2,200]

 

It seems that it has come out why Fani Willis was going to Washington DC on multiple occassions.    Fani and Nathan Wade before the Rico indictments went to DC to the law office of Armstrong Williams to meet none other than Bill Barr.   Bill Barr was the actual architect of the RICO cases in Georgia and outlined to Fani and Wade how to prosecute it.   Not shockingly, Bill Barr is the ultimate snake and is a big reason why none of Trump's election fraud cases went anywhere.   

And even more weird, Judge Juan Merchan is linked into this whole conspiracy through phone records. 

The story of what this whistleblower has gone through is pretty shocking, from hit attempts on her life, to FBI raids on phoney wire fraud charges, to seeking asylum in Mexico, to federal agents showing up in Mexico.   The whole reasons why oral arguments in this dismal case were canceled appears to be to cover up the extent of the scandal.

It is not about D' and R's.   The loyalty is to the corrupt deep state and is out to undermine every single constitutional rights we have.  Keep bootlicking idiots.   The people you support are lying evil bastards who are far more evil than is known.

[IGotWorms 4,025]

Fani should probably be charged with perjury. I haven’t really followed this since it immediately went off the rails, but sure seemed like she flat out lied on the stand and does this new decision basically establish that?

[edjr 6,300]

On 12/19/2024 at 11:42 AM, Alias Detective said:

 

 

 

 

Ooooooof!

Its like they all work for CNN

[edjr 6,300]

We have drobeski with the most thread wins in history.

We have a tie with tim/gutterboy with the most thread losses.

brutal

[edjr 6,300]

On 6/9/2024 at 3:42 PM, GutterBoy said:

I grew up

 

 

[squistion 1,655]

2 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Fani should probably be charged with perjury. I haven’t really followed this since it immediately went off the rails, but sure seemed like she flat out lied on the stand and does this new decision basically establish that?

Doubtful:

https://www.businessinsider.com/fani-willis-credibility-damaged-perjury-charges-unlikely-legal-experts-2024-3

Trump DA Fani Willis' credibility has been shot over messy testimony — but perjury charges are very unlikely: legal experts

[...]

Despite the conflicting stories, though, the likelihood Willis or anyone else involved in the case will ever face perjury charges over their testimony is slim to none, two legal experts told Business Insider.

"It's possible, but unlikely unless there's something that is more of a smoking gun," Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor in California, said of potential perjury charges.

Rahmani, the president and cofounder of West Coast Trial Lawyers, said there's "plenty of evidence" that shows Willis and Wade could have lied on the witness stand during the hearing, but said it's probably not enough to support a potential prosecution on perjury charges.

"You don't want to file charges unless you're pretty confident you can get a conviction," said Rahmani, who noted that, when it comes to Willis, it would be up to the Georgia state attorney general to bring those charges.

[Maximum Overkill 1,373]

3 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Fani should probably be charged with perjury

She should, but we all know how that goes 

[Alias Detective 1,313]

52 minutes ago, edjr said:

Its like they all work for CNN

Fish in a barrel Ed.

[jonmx 2,200]

46 minutes ago, squistion said:

Doubtful:

https://www.businessinsider.com/fani-willis-credibility-damaged-perjury-charges-unlikely-legal-experts-2024-3

Trump DA Fani Willis' credibility has been shot over messy testimony — but perjury charges are very unlikely: legal experts

[...]

Despite the conflicting stories, though, the likelihood Willis or anyone else involved in the case will ever face perjury charges over their testimony is slim to none, two legal experts told Business Insider.

"It's possible, but unlikely unless there's something that is more of a smoking gun," Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor in California, said of potential perjury charges.

Rahmani, the president and cofounder of West Coast Trial Lawyers, said there's "plenty of evidence" that shows Willis and Wade could have lied on the witness stand during the hearing, but said it's probably not enough to support a potential prosecution on perjury charges.

"You don't want to file charges unless you're pretty confident you can get a conviction," said Rahmani, who noted that, when it comes to Willis, it would be up to the Georgia state attorney general to bring those charges.

LoL, 'legal experts'.....code words for full of crap..   Fani will get disbarred.  If there are legal prosecutions against her, perjury is the least of them.  

[IGotWorms 4,025]

56 minutes ago, squistion said:

Doubtful:

https://www.businessinsider.com/fani-willis-credibility-damaged-perjury-charges-unlikely-legal-experts-2024-3

Trump DA Fani Willis' credibility has been shot over messy testimony — but perjury charges are very unlikely: legal experts

[...]

Despite the conflicting stories, though, the likelihood Willis or anyone else involved in the case will ever face perjury charges over their testimony is slim to none, two legal experts told Business Insider.

"It's possible, but unlikely unless there's something that is more of a smoking gun," Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor in California, said of potential perjury charges.

Rahmani, the president and cofounder of West Coast Trial Lawyers, said there's "plenty of evidence" that shows Willis and Wade could have lied on the witness stand during the hearing, but said it's probably not enough to support a potential prosecution on perjury charges.

"You don't want to file charges unless you're pretty confident you can get a conviction," said Rahmani, who noted that, when it comes to Willis, it would be up to the Georgia state attorney general to bring those charges.

Fock that, if she lied, charge her. As an attorney she cannot be getting away with that

[jbycho 207]

29 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Fock that, if she lied, charge her. As an attorney she cannot be getting away with that

Careful, she may not sleep with you again tonight. 

[squistion 1,655]

40 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Fock that, if she lied, charge her. As an attorney she cannot be getting away with that

If you read the article, the legal experts note that there is difficulty proving that she lied. 

[jonmx 2,200]

1 minute ago, squistion said:

If you read the article, the legal experts note that there is difficulty proving that she lied. 

Does it even matter?  She signs non-disclosure statements under penalty of perjury concerning contracts in the DAs office every year and she failed to disclosure her relationship with Wade.   She has admitted a relationship now.

[IGotWorms 4,025]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

If you read the article, the legal experts note that there is difficulty proving that she lied. 

Most cases have some difficulties 

[jbycho 207]

7 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Does it even matter?  She signs non-disclosure statements under penalty of perjury concerning contracts in the DAs office every year and she failed to disclosure her relationship with Wade.   She has admitted a relationship now.

Bill Clinton lied under oath and let off without question. Lying means nothing to liberals. 

[Mufaletta 41]

she'll be ok.   She has a closet full of cash, cause her daddy told her to stash cash.

[squistion 1,655]

2 hours ago, jonmx said:

Does it even matter?  She signs non-disclosure statements under penalty of perjury concerning contracts in the DAs office every year and she failed to disclosure her relationship with Wade.   She has admitted a relationship now.

Didn't their relationship start after he was appointed by her? 

[jonmx 2,200]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

Didn't their relationship start after he was appointed by her? 

It does not matter, it still needed to be disclosed and  she did not.  The phone records, locator information and other testimony says they are lying about when it started.   

[squistion 1,655]

On 12/20/2024 at 4:24 PM, jonmx said:

It does not matter, it still needed to be disclosed and  she did not.  The phone records, locator information and other testimony says they are lying about when it started.   

It does too, since it goes to whether she comitted perjury. and unless there is a recording of what was said, the phone records by themselves can't prove that there was perjury. 

[jonmx 2,200]

57 minutes ago, squistion said:

It does too, since it goes to whether she comitted perjury. and unless there is a recording of what was said, the phone records by themselves can't prove that there was perjury. 

Hey dipshit, she signs a disclosure statement every year which she has to disclose every potential conflict of interest she has under the penalty of purjury.  She lied on those forms.  

[squistion 1,655]

2 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Hey dipshit, she signs a disclosure statement every year which she has to disclose every potential conflict of interest she has under the penalty of purjury.  She lied on those forms.  

If it is so cut and dried why hasn't she been charged with perjury

[jonmx 2,200]

Just now, squistion said:

If it is so cut and dried why hasn't she been charged with perjury

There is a case being built against her.   She will either agree to go away or she will face consequences.   

[squistion 1,655]

1 minute ago, jonmx said:

There is a case being built against her.   She will either agree to go away or she will face consequences.   

Obviously not a very strong one since it hasn't been brought yet. And I noted above, some legal experts say proving she comitted perjury is a weak case despite you seem to think.

[jonmx 2,200]

4 hours ago, squistion said:

Obviously not a very strong one since it hasn't been brought yet. And I noted above, some legal experts say proving she comitted perjury is a weak case despite you seem to think.

You are a moron.  

[IGotWorms 4,025]

4 hours ago, jonmx said:

There is a case being built against her.   She will either agree to go away or she will face consequences.   

I would like to see her disbarred. That seems like the appropriate remedy to me

[squistion 1,655]

1 hour ago, jonmx said:

You are a moron.  

Because I pointed out what legal experts have said, that the case against for perjury is really weak and hard to prove.

Why, if it is as cut and dried as you keep saying, hasn't she been charged for perjury?

[jonmx 2,200]

11 minutes ago, squistion said:

Because I pointed out what legal experts have said, that the case against for perjury is really weak and hard to prove.

Why, if it is as cut and dried as you keep saying, hasn't she been charged for perjury?

What legal experts?  The ones on the propaganda networks? 

The experts that said Zimmerman would get convicted? 

The ones who said Trump should get thrown off the ballots. 

The ones who said Rittenhouse was a massive murderer. 

The experts who said president's do not have immunity.

The experts who told us the GA racketeering case was a slam dunk.

The experts who cheerlead for all the retarded cases in New York.

The experts who tell us Fani did nothing wrong.

It is jonmx 100 vs. Propaganda Legal Experts 0.

Let me give you a clue.   You experts are paid for whores who preach a narrative and lie about the law.  They are liars and idiots.