The Truthful State of the Election: Landslide confirmed...310 plus EV for Trump!

[Hardcore troubadour 14,163]

43 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Seriously? This is easy. I know you're "new" around here, but I'll explain it AGAIN. She's not Trump. Bare minimum of 50% of her vote is anti-Trump vote exclusively. Including mine. In MN. Turnip is far and away the most reviled politician in my lifetime. Whether he wins or not, half of America hates his fuking guts, and with good reason.

Only because he’s HITLER! Besides that he’s a good guy.  Everyone loved The Apprentice. 

[squistion 1,652]

15 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Being a US citizen is the big hang up for you

If Adolf came across the border illegally, then all bets would be off. 

[Horseman 1,986]

CNN reporting Trump within 1% of winning the popular vote. 

 

 

[BrahmaBulls 627]

56 minutes ago, squistion said:

If Adolf came across the border illegally, then all bets would be off. 

Another weird analogy from this waterhead

[Tree of Knowledge 1,430]

Driving around in Western PA today. Trump signs outnumber Kamala signs 15:1.  Lots of patriots are excited.  

[Fnord 1,664]

2 hours ago, Horseman said:

It's not happening!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.npr.org/2024/10/25/nx-s1-5165382/lancaster-county-voter-registration-fraud

"In its statement, the board stressed that county elections are secure and that flagging the potential fraud indicates the "systems worked." 

[jonmx 2,195]

2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

@jonmx deal?  If he does I won’t say covid

I really don't care if you say Covid.  So there is no point. 

  

[jbycho 203]

3 hours ago, Fnord said:

Seriously? This is easy. I know you're "new" around here, but I'll explain it AGAIN. She's not Trump. Bare minimum of 50% of her vote is anti-Trump vote exclusively. Including mine. In MN. Turnip is far and away the most reviled politician in my lifetime. Whether he wins or not, half of America hates his fuking guts, and with good reason.

We all already knew the leftists who have have been thoroughly programmed by their democrat leaders will vote for Harris. They are incapable of thinking outside of what their party line demands of them.

They are also incapable of being able to talk about their own candidate without turning it into a Trump bashing reply. They don't know anything about the candidates they vote for because they are programmed only to vote for who they are told to vote for, and to at all costs simply hate conservatives to their core. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,408]

6 minutes ago, jbycho said:

We all already knew the leftists who have have been thoroughly programmed by their democrat leaders will vote for Harris. They are incapable of thinking outside of what their party line demands of them.

They are also incapable of being able to talk about their own candidate without turning it into a Trump bashing reply. They don't know anything about the candidates they vote for because they are programmed only to vote for who they are told to vote for, and to at all costs simply hate conservatives to their core. 

fnretard is the epitome of liberal sheep.  No questions asked, no critical thinking required.  His masters tell him what to do and he does it.

And he's the same guy that will also try and fool you and tell you that he actually leans (or is) conservative. 

[jbycho 203]

4 hours ago, RLLD said:

Indoctrination.  Voting according to party instead of nation.

And that IS a big part of the definition of a cult if not the complete definition. 

 

[TimHauck 2,444]

48 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Driving around in Western PA today. Trump signs outnumber Kamala signs 15:1.  Lots of patriots are excited.  

Maybe this guy’s been to PA

 

 

[Frozenbeernuts 1,883]

6 minutes ago, jbycho said:

And that IS a big part of the definition of a cult if the the complete definition. 

 

Idk if you mean the Republicans or democrats are leading a cult right now, but this year has a lot of people switching their party vote from last election. People who straight up hated Donald Trump for 8 years now voting for him.

[Gepetto 1,192]

3 hours ago, thegeneral said:

Being a US citizen is the big hang up for you

I deleted that post. It was more in jest of how bad of a candidate I think Harris is, not that I would actually vote for A.H.

[thegeneral 2,490]

3 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

I deleted that post. It was more in jest of how bad of a candidate I think Harris is, not that I would actually vote for A.H.

Well that is good.

[jbycho 203]

On 10/25/2024 at 4:42 PM, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

fnretard is the epitome of liberal sheep.  No questions asked, no critical thinking required.  His masters tell him what to do and he does it.

And he's the same guy that will also try and fool you and tell you that he actually leans (or is) conservative. 

That's a funny thing those people who call themselves conservative yet support all liberal policy. 

I knew someone who would say, well, financially I'm conservative, but for  social policy, I'm leaning liberal Democrat.

There is no way in hell that a financially conservative person could want to spend big on the BS liberal programs of open borders, reparations, and the other BS the Democrats propose in this country. 

 

[HellToupee 1,252]

 

[squistion 1,652]

 

[jbycho 203]

On 10/25/2024 at 10:41 PM, HellToupee said:

 

That was a stellar delivery of that line.  A+

And so true. 

[jonmx 2,195]

49 minutes ago, squistion said:

 

 

Lol....You would have to be a complete idiot to believe that crappy poll.  All other polling is showing Trump getting 15 to 25 percent of the black vote.  The fact they only show 9 percent shows they grossly oversampled Democrats.   That is such a crap poll.  Every other poll conducted this year would have to be wrong for this piece of chit to be correct.  I can't even believe an organization would out that out.

[squistion 1,652]

Just now, jonmx said:

 

Lol....You would have to be a complete idiot to believe that crappy poll.  All other polling is showing Trump getting 15 to 25 percent of the black vote.  The fact they only show 9 percent shows they grossly oversampled Democrats.   That is such a crap poll.  Every other poll conducted this year would have to be wrong for this piece of chit to be correct.  I can't even believe an organization would out that out.

All other polling? That is incorrect, most other polls don't show that. 

[HellToupee 1,252]

What a bunch of sickos. Just ghouls . 

 

[jonmx 2,195]

25 minutes ago, squistion said:

All other polling? That is incorrect, most other polls don't show that. 

Get out of your effing MSNBC bubble.   The New York Times even admits Trump is doing better with blacks than any Republican Candidate since 1964.   There is zero chance in he-ll he only gets 9 percent.

 

Why Is Trump Gaining With Black and Hispanic Voters?

[squistion 1,652]

5 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Get out of your effing MSNBC bubble.   The New York Times even admits Trump is doing better with blacks than any Republican Candidate since 1964.   There is zero chance in he-ll he only gets 9 percent.

Why Is Trump Gaining With Black and Hispanic Voters?

He might get 11% and I don't see him getting 15% but it is unlikely but possible.

No way he will ever get 25%, Not a chance. None, when running against a black candidate.

[jbycho 203]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

He might get 11% and I don't see him getting 15% but it is unlikely but possible.

No way he will ever get 25%, Not a chance. None, when running against a black candidate.

Are you.saying black people aren't smart enough to look beyond race when they vote? I think you are. To the tune of at the very least 85% of them. 

[jonmx 2,195]

13 minutes ago, squistion said:

He might get 11% and I don't see him getting 15% but it is unlikely but possible.

No way he will ever get 25%, Not a chance. None, when running against a black candidate.

You are an effing moron.

[squistion 1,652]

5 minutes ago, jbycho said:

Are you.saying black people aren't smart enough to look beyond race when they vote? I think you are. To the tune of at the very least 85% of them. 

No, Straw Man. They probably recognize that a black candidate with a good record on civil rights issues willl do a lot more for themthan a candidate with a well documented history of racism (going back to renting apartments in the 70s, along with The Central Park Five, etc.).

[jbycho 203]

Just now, squistion said:

No, Straw Man. They probably recognize that a black candidate with a good record on civil rights issues willl do a lot more for themthan a candidate with a well documented history of racism (going back to renting apartments in the 70s, along with The Central Park Five, etc.).

So you are saying they are stupid and can't see the truth of things. Got it. 

[squistion 1,652]

Just now, jonmx said:

You are an effing moron.

Let's see how the voting goes on election day and we will see who is the "effing moron" 

[tubby_mcgee 699]

On 10/25/2024 at 8:44 AM, 5-Points said:

It's not so much about influencing who someone would vote for but whether or not they vote at all. 

If the polls say your guy is a lock to win or lose mebbe you decide to skip voting since your vote won't make a difference in the outcome. 

 

When, in reality, it's going to be a tight race and every vote matters. 

This I get, and I've thought about that angle also.

[Tree of Knowledge 1,430]

On 10/27/2024 at 11:00 AM, squistion said:

He might get 11% and I don't see him getting 15% but it is unlikely but possible.

No way he will ever get 25%, Not a chance. None, when running against a black candidate.

She’s not black.  

[OldMaid 2,108]

Quote

And all of these polls that show Harris getting under 90% of the Black vote are wrong. Nineteen sixty-four, Barry Goldwater got 7% of the Black vote; 2020, Trump got 8%. That’s one point every 56 years. It’s not going to change. I can’t tell you how many times I sat at Republican campaigns with very good pollsters showing us getting 15 to 20% of the Black vote. But I can tell you how many times it happened: Never.

Stuart Stevens

[League Champion 1,790]

A Pedocrat decided to put her cute Harris/WALZ sign in her store window a few weeks ago. Now she's going out of business and blaming people for not supposed her . She's your typical old washed up Pedo-Hag 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,163]

Donald Trump refused to rent to black people when he was in college. 

[jonmx 2,195]

On 10/28/2024 at 5:45 PM, OldMaid said:

Stuart Stevens

Also Stuart Stevens:  [Vice President Kamala Harris] "is running what we’re probably going to look back at as the best presidential campaign ever.”

Conformed idiot.  Trump is getting 15+% of the black vote.   

[jonmx 2,195]

Kari Lake has been ruled as dead for months, is now tied in Polling as Trump landslide may give him firm control of House and Senate.

[squistion 1,652]

14 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Kari Lake has been ruled as dead for months, is now tied in Polling as Trump landslide may give him firm control of House and Senate.

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/gop-backed-arizona-polls-have-it-wrong/

GOP-Backed Arizona Polls Have It Wrong

GOP-funded pollsters and polling groups with outlier results continue to flood the zone with polls of, at best, dubious credibility. Arizona—which Ad Impact now rates as the second-most-spent-on state in the country, after California, for media ads on political races—remains the ground zero of this misinformation game. The most recent example: Data Orbital, which has been awarded a diamond mark of credibility by The New York Times’ FiveThirtyEight, published a poll earlier this week showing Donald Trump up eight in Arizona. It also shows Kari Lake ahead of Ruben Gallego in the US Senate race.

This polling is simply not credible, flying in the face of dozens of other surveys over the past year that have shown the presidential race in the state to be a dead heat and Lake to be considerably behind Gallego in the Senate contest. If I were into conspiracy theories—which, of course, I’m not—I’d say this one was shaping up to be a doozie: The GOP pumps bad data into the polling universe to create a false sense of momentum, and then, when the election result doesn’t go the way those polls suggest it will, the GOP and its election-denying base cries foul, launches a whole bunch of phony investigations, files lawsuits, and does everything it can to gum up the certification process, making it more likely that a Democratic-leaning Arizona won’t be able to certify its electors in time for Congress to count them.

ike Noble, an Arizona-based pollster I have talked to several times in this cycle who believes the GOP is deliberately skewing the numbers with bad polling data, is furious. All the evidence that he and his team have gathered shows that the Arizona race is incredibly tight, and nothing they have seen suggests it broke decisively for Trump this week. They published their last statewide poll of the election cycle on Thursday, alongside a national poll that shows Harris up three points. In Arizona, Noble’s data has Trump up only 1 percent, with 48 percent to Harris’s 47, and with Gallego up four points.

[...]

 

 

[jonmx 2,195]

10 minutes ago, squistion said:

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/gop-backed-arizona-polls-have-it-wrong/

GOP-Backed Arizona Polls Have It Wrong

GOP-funded pollsters and polling groups with outlier results continue to flood the zone with polls of, at best, dubious credibility. Arizona—which Ad Impact now rates as the second-most-spent-on state in the country, after California, for media ads on political races—remains the ground zero of this misinformation game. The most recent example: Data Orbital, which has been awarded a diamond mark of credibility by The New York Times’ FiveThirtyEight, published a poll earlier this week showing Donald Trump up eight in Arizona. It also shows Kari Lake ahead of Ruben Gallego in the US Senate race.

This polling is simply not credible, flying in the face of dozens of other surveys over the past year that have shown the presidential race in the state to be a dead heat and Lake to be considerably behind Gallego in the Senate contest. If I were into conspiracy theories—which, of course, I’m not—I’d say this one was shaping up to be a doozie: The GOP pumps bad data into the polling universe to create a false sense of momentum, and then, when the election result doesn’t go the way those polls suggest it will, the GOP and its election-denying base cries foul, launches a whole bunch of phony investigations, files lawsuits, and does everything it can to gum up the certification process, making it more likely that a Democratic-leaning Arizona won’t be able to certify its electors in time for Congress to count them.

ike Noble, an Arizona-based pollster I have talked to several times in this cycle who believes the GOP is deliberately skewing the numbers with bad polling data, is furious. All the evidence that he and his team have gathered shows that the Arizona race is incredibly tight, and nothing they have seen suggests it broke decisively for Trump this week. They published their last statewide poll of the election cycle on Thursday, alongside a national poll that shows Harris up three points. In Arizona, Noble’s data has Trump up only 1 percent, with 48 percent to Harris’s 47, and with Gallego up four points.

[...]

 

 

LOL....Trump up only 1 point in AZ.   That is disgusting misinformation.  Trump wins AZ by 6 plus points. 

[squistion 1,652]

Just now, jonmx said:

LOL....Trump up only 1 point in AZ.   That is disgusting misinformation.  Trump wins AZ by 6 plus points. 

Not close to that according to any legitimate poll I've seen. 

[jonmx 2,195]

35 minutes ago, squistion said:

Not close to that according to any legitimate poll I've seen. 

Legitimate my arse.  Any poll showing anywhere near a dead heat in AZ is lying crapola.  

[Fnord 1,664]

Shocking. The party that's whined about cheating while getting throttled in the popular vote the past several presidential cycles has now expanded to fake polling info to back up their inevitable fraud claims.

And wackjobs will eat it up and get violent. All in the name of an old, pathetic sore loser.

I'm feeling better about Harris' chances. I wouldn't bet on it, but confidence is ascendant.