Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frozenbeernuts

LGBTQ is a Trojan horse for pedophilia

Recommended Posts

You're standing with open arms on the other side of the gateway to ignorance.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Death said:

You're standing with open arms on the other side of the gateway to ignorance.

What's it feel like over there on your side? I heard ignorance is bliss. Is this true? 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Wait I thought you guys didn’t have a problem with the L’s and G’s?  (I mean other than some people like @iam90sbaby and @Cdub100)

This is what you got out of what I posted? No concern for castration children and the obvious path this is all leading to? Most people don't care what any adult does in their personal life. It's how this stuff is pushed on children.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

This is what you got out of what I posted? No concern for castration children and the obvious path this is all leading to? Most people don't care what any adult does in their personal life. It's how this stuff is pushed on children.

Yeah, that is what I got from your post. Despite the T’s being a very small part of LGBT you lumped all of LGBT together so clearly it means you think the L’s and G’s are pedophiles too..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

This is what you got out of what I posted? No concern for castration children and the obvious path this is all leading to? Most people don't care what any adult does in their personal life. It's how this stuff is pushed on children.

Why would they be concerned?  One of the main motivations of their elite rulers they bootlick for is the depopulation of undesirables (you know, kind of Nazi-like).   So mass sterilization of children is a good thing.  As are endless wars.  As are abortions.  As are driveby assisted suicides.  As are one-child policies.  This is our future if we keep electing elitist bastards.   Mass concentration of power in secretive agencies with no accountability is not a good thing for the average citizen.  In fact it is a certain recipe for mass poverty and enslavement.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

This is what you got out of what I posted? No concern for castration children and the obvious path this is all leading to? Most people don't care what any adult does in their personal life. It's how this stuff is pushed on children.

Children (under the age of 18) are not being castrated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Why would they be concerned?  One of the main motivations of their elite rulers they bootlick for is the depopulation of undesirables (you know, kind of Nazi-like).

So mass sterilization of children is a good thing.  As are endless wars.  As are abortions.  As are driveby assisted suicides.  As are one-child policies.  This is our future if we keep electing elitist bastards.   Mass concentration of power in secretive agencies with no accountability is not a good thing for the average citizen.  In fact it is a certain recipe for mass poverty and enslavement.  

Mass sterilization of children has not happened either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, squistion said:

Mass sterilization of children has not happened either.

How many children are on puberty blockers?  50,000?  100,000?  200,000?   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jonmx said:

How many children are on puberty blockers?  50,000?  100,000?  200,000?   

A puberty blocker does not cause sterilization:

From a Google search:

Question:

Does taking a puberty blocker cause sterilization?

Answer:

No, taking puberty blockers alone should not make someone infertile. However, there is uncertainty about the long-term effects of puberty blockers on fertility, and some say there is a lack of data on the subject

 

 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is actually common knowledge & has been discussed by my work. One of the things these ppl do is bring in kids for exams so we are going to be trained how to identify lgbtq kids that are experiencing this with their grownups 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, squistion said:

A puberty blocker does not cause sterilization:

From a Google search:

Question:

Does taking a puberty blocker cause sterilization?

Answer:

No, taking puberty blockers alone should not make someone infertile. However, there is uncertainty about the long-term effects of puberty blockers on fertility, and some say there is a lack of data on the subject

 

 

Puberty blockers are cancer drugs. They stop your sex organs from fully developing at a natural state.  They do not need more studies. They need to be banned. Like they are in most of the EU

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, F1erce said:

This is actually common knowledge & has been discussed by my work. One of the things these ppl do is bring in kids for exams so we are going to be trained how to identify lgbtq kids that are experiencing this with their grownups 

What people?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, squistion said:

A puberty blocker does not cause sterilization:

From a Google search:

Question:

Does taking a puberty blocker cause sterilization?

Answer:

No, taking puberty blockers alone should not make someone infertile. However, there is uncertainty about the long-term effects of puberty blockers on fertility, and some say there is a lack of data on the subject

 

 

 

Oh boy, Google says so.  I am so convinced, eventhough there have been exactly zero long term research which shows this.  There is a lot of anecdotal evidence and small clinical studies which suggest otherwise.   But for right now, giving children puberty blockers and hormones is a very dangerous experimental practice which provides zero proven benefits and unknown long-term safety/harms. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, squistion said:

A puberty blocker does not cause sterilization:

From a Google search:

Question:

Does taking a puberty blocker cause sterilization?

Answer:

No, taking puberty blockers alone should not make someone infertile. However, there is uncertainty about the long-term effects of puberty blockers on fertility, and some say there is a lack of data on the subject

 

 

JFC you defend everything about boys thinking they're girls and girls thinking they're boys.  Don't you slurp jizz from the party of science?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

JFC you defend everything about boys thinking they're girls and girls thinking they're boys.  Don't you slurp jizz from the party of science?

Democrats are sick people 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Wait I thought you guys didn’t have a problem with the L’s and G’s?  (I mean other than some people like @iam90sbaby and @Cdub100)

I was also told that the Republican Party doesn’t care about Ls and Gs anymore. 🤡 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, MDC said:

I was also told that the Republican Party doesn’t care about Ls and Gs anymore. 🤡 

They sure do in this forum. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, MDC said:

I was also told that the Republican Party doesn’t care about Ls and Gs anymore. 🤡 

We don’t care about the run of the mill LGBTQer . It’s the sickos we care about and so should you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Squiz working overtime to defend pedophilia.  Wow.

Funny he never has a bad word about lgbtq criminals. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LGBTQRST and the subsequent perverted attacks on America's kids is directly down the slippery slope of fbgheys marriage we were warned would happen. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As an aside, Donald was the best president that the lgbtq community has ever had. This regime just uses them as pawns. They would rather support the evil in the community to the detriment of the rest of the good folk there. Sad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

We don’t care about the run of the mill LGBTQer . 

Then why name them in the thread title? :unsure: 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Yeah, that is what I got from your post. Despite the T’s being a very small part of LGBT you lumped all of LGBT together so clearly it means you think the L’s and G’s are pedophiles too..

Do you agree with children receiving chemical or physical sex changes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, squistion said:

Mass sterilization of children has not happened either.

😆 oh because mass sterilization hasn't happened, no biggie? It's only a few children right now having their genitals mutilated by surgeons and a few children being chemically castrated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Frozenbeernuts said:

😆 oh because mass sterilization hasn't happened, no biggie? It's only a few children right now having their genitals mutilated by surgeons and a few children being chemically castrated.

Didn't say that Strawman. But there is not one documented case of children having their genitals mutilated by surgeons. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Because that was the point of the video I linked to.

I know. @HellToupee thinks you guys don’t care about “run of the mill LGBTQer”. Obviously you do. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, squistion said:

A puberty blocker does not cause sterilization:

From a Google search:

Question:

Does taking a puberty blocker cause sterilization?

Answer:

No, taking puberty blockers alone should not make someone infertile. However, there is uncertainty about the long-term effects of puberty blockers on fertility, and some say there is a lack of data on the subject

 

 

Funny, I get a slightly different answer:

Quote

Taking puberty blockers alone should not affect your ability to have a baby in the future. But if you also take estrogen or testosterone, this can affect it. If your body has ovaries that produce eggs, taking testosterone can affect the ability to produce them.

Is your assertion that these kids getting puberty blockers are NOT getting estrogen or testosterone as well?  Because that would be a false assertion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

😆 oh because mass sterilization hasn't happened, no biggie? It's only a few children right now having their genitals mutilated by surgeons and a few children being chemically castrated.

You are stuck in a word nitpick with Squissy.  He will argue the definition/applicability of words like "mass" and "mutilation."  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDC said:

I know. @HellToupee thinks you guys don’t care about “run of the mill LGBTQer”. Obviously you do. 

There's no problem at all with the L or G's. It's all your sick perverted fetishes that you hide behind with pronouns that sicken us. 

The fact that you endorse turning little Boys into girls and girls into boys for your own pleasures. Tampons in Boys rooms, Men in Girls rooms, Taking away Women's rights by calling a Man in a wig a Woman and acting like that's normal. 

It's all your other fetishes that sicken us. 

Just Pervy 🌈 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Ls and Gs movement got intentionally hijacked.  It’s the only way the Ts could gain traction as legitimate. Ask any gay person over 40.  21st century LGBT is not what they signed on for.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

The Ls and Gs movement got intentionally hijacked.  It’s the only way the Ts could gain traction as legitimate. Ask any gay person over 40.  21st century LGBT is not what they signed on for.  

I sometimes listen to the Dave Rubin podcast, he's a conservative, also gay (married to a guy, recently adopted kids).

He recently said basically the above.  He doesn't understand how gender identity got mixed in with sexual preference.  He's also concerned that a lot of gay children are being convinced that they are a different gender.  He's probably right.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Do you agree with children receiving chemical or physical sex changes?

What does that have to do with the L’s and G’s?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×