Jump to content
jerryskids

Discussion of Concerns for Trump Presidency

Recommended Posts

John Thune is the new Senate leader. 

I like this. Old time establishment Republican. Of course he supports Trump but he’s not MAGA. Will protect the Senate’s prerogatives I hope. 
 

I’m betting that for the same reasons I like this the MAGA crowd will hate it. Globalist member of the Uniparty and Deep State! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Death said:

I thought we were talking about the term Reproductive Rights.

I'm not familiar with Reproduction Rights and that one must learn about them from a McDonald's manager. 

Is this something taught in Hamburger University?

You've really opened my eyes to so much that I don't know!

Thank you!

(I apologize if this is too many sentences for you to absorb in one sitting.)

 

Say Clownzo!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Just like having asthma makes you ineligible for combat duty. Being a tranny does to. You can’t put someone in that position that needs daily medication

and wokeness is horrible in the military. They lowered the requirements physically to meet quotas. The military is only as strong as its weakest member. And that’s always a tranny or woman 

I do feel there is still a roll for trannies in the military 
 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Thune only won because the rules say this vote has to be secret. If the Senators had to openly decide Trump would have instructed them who to vote for. 

Still into your conspiracy theories I see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Thats not a conspiracy theory. And I’m not into conspiracy theories at all. 

So where is your basis of knowing this 100% coming from? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

It’s an assumption. Do you think I’m wrong about this? If so why? 

You used the "if" and assumed something while you have displayed extraordinary results of being wrong about what would have or will happen in the political arena on this site. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jbycho said:

You used the "if" and assumed something while you have displayed extraordinary results of being wrong about what would have or will happen in the political arena on this site. 

Do you think I’m wrong about this? If so, why? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Do you think I’m wrong about this? If so, why? 

Do you think I'm wrong? And if so, why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jbycho said:

Do you think I'm wrong? And if so, why?

I want to discuss the news. You seem to want to discuss ME. About whether you’re right or wrong about me, I’m indifferent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I think we should differentiate between those born Jewish and those who married into it. It’s different if they’re shiksas. 

That would take more effort than I am willing to invest, but you are invited to do so.  Also, it might highlight the ability ofJewish men to get hot women.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I want to discuss the news. You seem to want to discuss ME. About whether you’re right or wrong about me, I’m indifferent.

You aren't discussing the news.  You're discussing your conspiracy hypotheticals because Trump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Death said:

Curious how much MAGAloids obsess over this. Normal folks spend little time thinking about it, much less obsessing. Frankly, the only time it enters my mind is when witnessing the MAGAloid obsessing over it, so much obsession that it's impossible to ignore. 

Then you've got poor BrahmaBalls here not only raging with obsession but believing Reproductive Rights means some federally orchestrated right for men and women to fock and have babies.

It would be disturbing if it weren't so amusing.

Is "MAGAloid" part of you having serious discussions, Rustor?

2 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Just like having asthma makes you ineligible for combat duty. Being a tranny does to. You can’t put someone in that position that needs daily medication

and wokeness is horrible in the military. They lowered the requirements physically to meet quotas. The military is only as strong as its weakest member. And that’s always a tranny or woman 

My daughter has Type 1 diabetes; she can't join the military because she needs daily medication (insulin) to survive.  I've often used her as an example, when people argue that men should compete in women's sports, that "the pursuit of happiness" does not mean you get to pursue every possible avenue of happiness.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said:

Given the tangent on Jewish Actresses got some traction, though many would have rearranged the list I thought I would list my personnal favorites, more or less in order, though the order is not written in stone.

 

Margot Robbie

Gal Gadot

Natalie Portman

Kate Beckinsale

Scarlett Johansson

Alicia Vikander

Angelina Jolie

Chalize Theron

Kim Basinger

Audrey hepburn

Jessica Alba

Megan Fox

Mila Kunis

Michelle Pfeiffer

Isla Fischer

Jessica Lange

Olivia Wilde

Julia Roberts

Jennifer Connelly

Cameeon Diaz

Emmanulle Chriqui

Courtney Cox

Reese Witherspoon

Milla Jovovich

Goldie Hawn

Daina Agron

Amanda Peet

Heather Graham

Marilyn Monroe

Lily James

Rachel McAdams

Eva Green

Gemma Arterton

Natasha Henstridge

Denise Richards

Malin Akerman

Jennifer Lawrence

Robin Wright

Jennifer Aniston

Brie larson

Kristen Stewart

Amber Heard

Kate Mara 

Sandra Bullock

 

Based on how they looked in their prime, of course.

No Emma Stone?  You are dead to me.  :thumbsdown: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Strike said:

Don't remember you complaining when Buttplug was announced as secretary of transportation.

Okay- so now what are your thoughts on Hegseth's credentials? I know they are important to you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

Some of the appointments over the past two days don't exactly fill with confidence.

Noem- what are her qualifications on handling cyber security or border issues or any of that? 

Well we know she isn’t letting any dogs get across the border 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh boy.  Vengeance your 2025. Get your popcorn ! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Matt Gaetz for attorney general. 
 

Ahahahahahahahahaha! 

I’m excited. Thank God Donald won

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump is killing it. He's a true president elect rather than the Democrat hacks. 

Thank God Trump won.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Oh boy.  Vengeance your 2025. Get your popcorn ! 

Oh it’s coming big time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Real timschochet said:

Well.. this is what the public voted for. So be it. 

:clap:

elections have consequences 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Well.. this is what the public voted for. So be it. 

The public is going to get a lot of things that they never expected when they voted for Trump (and most of them they won't like).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Matt Gaetz for attorney general. 
 

Ahahahahahahahahaha! 

OMG - I thought this was a joke.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Matt Gaetz for attorney general. 
 

Ahahahahahahahahaha! 

🤮

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Oh boy.  Vengeance your 2025. Get your popcorn ! 

I can't wait for Gaetz to go after all those people who tried to stop him from providing drugs and having sex with minors. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Add Gaetz as Attorney General and Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence to the list of concerns. I will say that it is very Trumpian to hire a piece of human shlt for AG and a Russia/Assad sympathizer as the spy chief. What could possibly go wrong?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Will Matt Gaetz investigate himself for banging a minor 🤔

Matt, Matt...Mike Honcho, Detroit Free Press, you have always promoted transparency in govt., will you release the DOJ reports on you supplying high school girls with ecstasy and taking them across state lines for sex?  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Add Gaetz as Attorney General and Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence to the list of concerns. I will say that it is very Trumpian to hire a piece of human shlt for AG and a Russia/Assad sympathizer as the spy chief. What could possibly go wrong?

I'm not a Gaetz fan.  I disagree with your concerns with Gabbard, however.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, squistion said:

The public is going to get a lot of things that they never expected when they voted for Trump (and most of them they won't like).

Dude has me on ignore.  But quoted.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Matt Gaetz for attorney general. 
 

Ahahahahahahahahaha! 

amazing, the one guy that stands for the constitution, and single handedly removed neocon mccarthy

I don't like him not being a voice in the house

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

On the news they’re predicting that there’s not enough GOP senators to go along with this. I think they roll over but let’s see. 

Well, they didn't roll over and vote for Rick Scott, so maybe there's a chance...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

On the FAKE News they’re predicting that there’s not enough GOP senators to go along with this. I think they roll over but let’s see. 

Fixed. Sources close to some idiot at msnbc isn’t the news 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Fnord said:

Well, they didn't roll over and vote for Rick Scott, so maybe there's a chance...

That was a secret vote. This won’t be. That was my whole point earlier. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×