Biden-Harris administration supporting minor transition

[Frozenbeernuts 1,883]

Almost half the country voted for this. Liberals have no idea what they are trying to usher into our country. Clueless demographic of people who hate themselves.

https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1864287334235058414?s=19

[The Phantom's Phantom 206]

Another Tranny thread 

[Frozenbeernuts 1,883]

4 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Another Tranny thread 

It's a big deal. They are arguing this in front of the Supreme Court. You may be fine with cutting off parts of your child and destroying their future, but that doesn't mean it should be allowed. Abuse isn't acceptable. This is some of the worst forms of abuse that anyone could throw at their child.

[Mike Honcho 4,731]

3 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

It's a big deal. They are arguing this in front of the Supreme Court. You may be fine with cutting off parts of your child and destroying their future, but that doesn't mean it should be allowed. Abuse isn't acceptable. This is some of the worst forms of abuse that anyone could throw at their child.

Yeah, it should be pretty funny watching the cons on the court who preach keeping the govt. out of your lives twist themselves to embrace the position that the govt. is better equipped to decide medical treatments for children rather than their parents and doctors.

[IGotWorms 4,028]

Election’s over, dummy. You won. Sorry, I guess?

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,051]

4 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Yeah, it should be pretty funny watching the cons are the court who preach keeping the govt. out of your lives twist themselves to embrace the position that the govt. is better equipped to decide medical treatments for children rather than their parents and doctors.

You think child abuse is good. Wow 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,423]

53 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Another Tranny thread 

Now that you're in here it certainly is.  Can't have a tranny thread w/out an actual tranny in it! 

[kilroy69 1,162]

This is a really big deal and could usher in the death blow to this type of mental illness being encouraged by doctors. 

[Reality 3,043]

This should be an obvious hard no for any minor but, that's how focked the left is in this country. 

13 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

You think child abuse is good. Wow 

Stunning, huh? 

In a just world, it never had to get to SCOTUS but, as you can see, there are truly sick people in this country.

[Strike 4,814]

53 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Yeah, it should be pretty funny watching the cons are the court who preach keeping the govt. out of your lives twist themselves to embrace the position that the govt. is better equipped to decide medical treatments for children rather than their parents and doctors.

Surgical transition isn't medicine.  At best it's cosmetic surgery.

[Maximum Overkill 1,404]

It's simple fact.

Democrats Love Trannies and Hate Real Women.  

[squistion 1,656]

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

2 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Yeah, it should be pretty funny watching the cons are the court who preach keeping the govt. out of your lives twist themselves to embrace the position that the govt. is better equipped to decide medical treatments for children rather than their parents and doctors.

Wow. WTF? Sad man. Sad. 

[squistion 1,656]

2 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

It's a big deal. They are arguing this in front of the Supreme Court. You may be fine with cutting off parts of your child and destroying their future, but that doesn't mean it should be allowed. Abuse isn't acceptable. This is some of the worst forms of abuse that anyone could throw at their child.

This isn't about cutting off parts of kids, it is about gender affirming hormone therapies, not surgery.

 

[The Real timschochet 5,232]

The issue involved is actually bigger than transgenderism, from my understanding. When Tennessee made the ban they didn’t ban ALL gender affirming care, only for anyone under the age of 18. However, the plaintiffs here represented by the ACLU are adult parents who have given their permission for these procedures. 
 

So the question is whether the state has the right to take away medical procedures only for minors even if adult parents sign off on them. Which is, in my mind, a difficult question, even if I predict the post- Dobbs court will probably rule in Tennessee’s favor. Ironically it would have been more clear if Tennesee had simply made all gender affirming treatment illegal (but I sense that, among most conservatives, there is still a streak of libertarianism that prevents this no matter how opposed they are to trans.) 

[jonmx 2,202]

The FDA bans all kinds of drugs.   Why shouldn't states be allowed to ban drugs which have not been proven safe for this application.  The court will not provide a right to specific medical treatments but they could compromise and claim the ban was too broad.  

[The Real timschochet 5,232]

2 minutes ago, jonmx said:

The FDA bans all kinds of drugs.   Why shouldn't states be allowed to ban drugs which have not been proven safe for this application.  The court will not provide a right to specific medical treatments but they could compromise and claim the ban was too broad.  

Well first off the FDA hasn’t banned these drugs so apparently according to them there is no concern about safety. And second, the FDA isn’t supposed to be a political body. I want the FDA making rules and regulations regarding health issues- state legislatures not so much. 
 

Finally you missed the main distinction: Tennessee isn’t banning these treatments. They’re only banning them under the age of 18. And that becomes problematic because of the question of parental consent. 

[jbycho 208]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Well first off the FDA hasn’t banned these drugs so apparently according to them there is no concern about safety. And second, the FDA isn’t supposed to be a political body. I want the FDA making rules and regulations regarding health issues- state legislatures not so much. 
 

Finally you missed the main distinction: Tennessee isn’t banning these treatments. They’re only banning them under the age of 18. And that becomes problematic because of the question of parental consent. 

Of course you are for screwing up kids. You're a liberal doosh. Shocking. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

28 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Well first off the FDA hasn’t banned these drugs so apparently according to them there is no concern about safety. And second, the FDA isn’t supposed to be a political body. I want the FDA making rules and regulations regarding health issues- state legislatures not so much. 
 

Finally you missed the main distinction: Tennessee isn’t banning these treatments. They’re only banning them under the age of 18. And that becomes problematic because of the question of parental consent. 

Your kind should be rounded up.  

[supermike80 1,600]

49 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

The issue involved is actually bigger than transgenderism, from my understanding. When Tennessee made the ban they didn’t ban ALL gender affirming care, only for anyone under the age of 18. However, the plaintiffs here represented by the ACLU are adult parents who have given their permission for these procedures. 
 

So the question is whether the state has the right to take away medical procedures only for minors even if adult parents sign off on them. Which is, in my mind, a difficult question, even if I predict the post- Dobbs court will probably rule in Tennessee’s favor. Ironically it would have been more clear if Tennesee had simply made all gender affirming treatment illegal (but I sense that, among most conservatives, there is still a streak of libertarianism that prevents this no matter how opposed they are to trans.) 

Cant an adult get arrested for giving alcohol to their kids?     So that's against the law, but allowing them to get gender modification is OK.   Fock that whole idea.

[Fnord 1,664]

1 minute ago, supermike80 said:

Cant an adult get arrested for giving alcohol to their kids?     So that's against the law, but allowing them to get gender modification is OK.   Fock that whole idea.

It's legal for adults to give their minor children alcohol in quite a few states, both red and blue. There are actually quite a few exceptions for minors to drink and possess booze. Link

Do you think that should be illegal?

[The Real timschochet 5,232]

10 minutes ago, Fnord said:

It's legal for adults to give their minor children alcohol in quite a few states, both red and blue. There are actually quite a few exceptions for minors to drink and possess booze. Link

Do you think that should be illegal?

Beyond that, I think there is a significant distinction between alcohol and medical treatments. 

[The Real timschochet 5,232]

31 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Your kind should be rounded up.  

This is the sort of typical rebuttal on your part which has established your fully deserved reputation. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

33 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

This is the sort of typical rebuttal on your part which has established your fully deserved reputation. 

I’m kind of a big deal around here. You know this. You’re a punch line. 

[Frozenbeernuts 1,883]

4 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Yeah, it should be pretty funny watching the cons on the court who preach keeping the govt. out of your lives twist themselves to embrace the position that the govt. is better equipped to decide medical treatments for children rather than their parents and doctors.

I am actually a little surprised I'm reading this. I had assumed you would be opposed to mutilating children. I typically assume anyone who is a liberal is for it, but I didn't in this case. Guess my original inclination is correct to assume all liberals are racist, facist, brain washed NPCs who really have no clue what they are talking about. Man you have no ground to stand on for any argument if you're pro child mutilation. Zero credibility.

[Frozenbeernuts 1,883]

Liberals have no idea that if you can cut a kids private parts off, anything is fair game. They no longer have any protection. It won't be obvious at first, but the slippery slope will show its head.

How many years until Honcho, Worms, and the other libs are open advocating for MAPs. MAPs are pedophiles of course but the left calls them MAPs.

[Strike 4,814]

Sotomayor compared "gender affirming care" to taking an aspirin

[Fnord 1,664]

1 hour ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

I am actually a little surprised I'm reading this. I had assumed you would be opposed to mutilating children. I typically assume anyone who is a liberal is for it, but I didn't in this case. Guess my original inclination is correct to assume all liberals are racist, facist, brain washed NPCs who really have no clue what they are talking about. Man you have no ground to stand on for any argument if you're pro child mutilation. Zero credibility.

Dude, get a grip. We don't support "child mutilation." That is NOT what this is about. You know this, but refuse to acknowledge it. Why?

[Reality 3,043]

42 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Dude, get a grip. We don't support "child mutilation." That is NOT what this is about. You know this, but refuse to acknowledge it. Why?

LoL

[weepaws 3,009]

6 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Almost half the country voted for this. Liberals have no idea what they are trying to usher into our country. Clueless demographic of people who hate themselves.

https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1864287334235058414?s=19

Wasn’t this already known to the world?  

Matthew 1:21.  And she shall bring forth a Son, and thou shall call His name Jesus, for He Shall Save His people from their sins.  Indeed 

Is your name in the book of life, you can be certain, acceptance of Jesus Christ your Lord and Savior.  Amen Thanks 

[IGotWorms 4,028]

2 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Liberals have no idea that if you can cut a kids private parts off, anything is fair game. They no longer have any protection. It won't be obvious at first, but the slippery slope will show its head.

How many years until Honcho, Worms, and the other libs are open advocating for MAPs. MAPs are pedophiles of course but the left calls them MAPs.

You’re nuts. Wacko. Psycho. Insane.

[jbycho 208]

Just now, IGotWorms said:

You’re nuts. Wacko. Psycho. Insane.

You are all into male kids pretending they are girls for some sick reason. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,051]

3 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Beyond that, I think there is a significant distinction between alcohol and medical treatments. 

sterilization is a medical treatment that should be protected?

 

[Fireballer 2,599]

The HHS, anchored by Admiral Richard Levine, has advocated for genital surgery for years.  This is not new

[Maximum Overkill 1,404]

5 hours ago, squistion said:

This isn't about cutting off parts of kids, it is about gender affirming hormone therapies, not surgery.

That's Gay Squissy  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,164]

30 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

The HHS, anchored by Admiral Richard Levine, has advocated for genital surgery for years.  This is not new

Yup.  And Biden is in favor of gender affirming care, which includes  mutilation, for minors.  And half of these filthy bastards vote for it. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,404]

 

 

[Frozenbeernuts 1,883]

2 hours ago, Fnord said:

Dude, get a grip. We don't support "child mutilation." That is NOT what this is about. You know this, but refuse to acknowledge it. Why?

By messing with the chemicals in a child's body like this it is chemical castration. That's mutilation. Why do I need to spell this out? Why is this controversial?

[Maximum Overkill 1,404]

8 hours ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Another Tranny thread 

What wrong with Pedocrats? Why do you people love F'ING with Kids sexuality. 

Sickening!  

[IGotWorms 4,028]

1 hour ago, jbycho said:

You are all into male kids pretending they are girls for some sick reason. 

Who is?

Not me