Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Hardcore troubadour

Haha. ABC pays Trump 16 million

Recommended Posts

Hey libtards that keep saying Trump was found liable for Rape, looky here. Cost ABC millions for making that false claim. Looking at the dopes Gutterboy, Squishy , Rusty ( of course) and the rest of you clowns. You can stop saying it now. Worms too. Wrong again. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A judge concluded in August 2023, when dismissing Trump’s countersuit against Carroll, that the claim Trump raped Carroll was “substantially true.” The judge wrote that Trump “raped” her in the broader sense of that word, as people generally understand it, though not as it is narrowly defined by New York state law.

Also they settled, they didn't pay trump, they will pay a charity.

I'll still say he raped her, but if being a sexual abuser is more sanitizing for trump ball lockers then go right ahead.

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

A judge concluded in August 2023, when dismissing Trump’s countersuit against Carroll, that the claim Trump raped Carroll was “substantially true.” The judge wrote that Trump “raped” her in the broader sense of that word, as people generally understand it, though not as it is narrowly defined by New York state law.

Also they settled, they didn't pay trump, they will pay a charity.

I'll still say he raped her, but if being a sexual abuser is more sanitizing for trump ball lockers then go right ahead.

Was he convicted of it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And being the Mensch that Donald Trump is, he isn’t taking any money. Lawyer fees and the rest to charity.  Merry  Christmas. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

A judge concluded in August 2023, when dismissing Trump’s countersuit against Carroll, that the claim Trump raped Carroll was “substantially true.” The judge wrote that Trump “raped” her in the broader sense of that word, as people generally understand it, though not as it is narrowly defined by New York state law.

Also they settled, they didn't pay trump, they will pay a charity.

I'll still say he raped her, but if being a sexual abuser is more sanitizing for trump ball lockers then go right ahead.

That judge was wrong, bich. You got got. Once again. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

That judge was wrong, bich. You got got. Once again. 

Between Gutterboy and Squiz I think there is a contest between them on who can slurp the most propaganda protein at the far-left glory hole.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Between Gutterboy and Squiz I think their is a contest between them on who can slurp the most propaganda protein at the far-left glory hole.

From what I understand Gutterboy was once somewhat normal.   But like many co-Ed’s and wine moms across the country, he got a bad case of TDS.  One of the worst I have seen. Would not shock me if he had a nose ring.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

That judge was wrong, bich. You got got. Once again. 

The judge was not wrong.

But keep defending a sexual abuser.

See according to me, sexual abusers are terrible people.  You worship them, call them alphas and bosses.  You have zero character 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

From what I understand Gutterboy was once somewhat normal.   But like many co-Ed’s and wine moms across the country, he got a bad case of TDS.  One of the worst I have seen. Would not shock me if he had a nose ring.   

Nose ring, nipple rings and c0ck rings - he has them all, I'm guessing.  He's definitely the type.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

The judge was not wrong.

But keep defending a sexual abuser.

See according to me, sexual abusers are terrible people.  You worship them, call them alphas and bosses.  You have zero character 

 No I don’t. I just think, nay, know, that E Jean Carroll is FOS. If I thought she wasn’t I would not have voted for him.  And the Judge is a weirdo left wing lying piece of garbage.  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

A judge concluded in August 2023, when dismissing Trump’s countersuit against Carroll, that the claim Trump raped Carroll was “substantially true.” The judge wrote that Trump “raped” her in the broader sense of that word, as people generally understand it, though not as it is narrowly defined by New York state law.

Also they settled, they didn't pay trump, they will pay a charity.

I'll still say he raped her, but if being a sexual abuser is more sanitizing for trump ball lockers then go right ahead.

Phantom's Tantrum 😂 🌈 

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

 No I don’t. I just think, nay, know, that E Jean Carroll is FOS. If I thought she wasn’t I would not have voted for him.  And the Judge is a weirdo left wing lying piece of garbage.  

And the dozens of other women who tell the exact same story, full of sh1t too right?

Keep supporting sexual abusers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

And the dozens of other women who tell the exact same story, full of sh1t too right?

Keep supporting sexual abusers.

Exact same story? In the changing room at Bergdoff? Middle of the day, Trump by himself?  Big shopper the Don. And none of them could say what year it was either? What a sucker you are. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

And the dozens of other women who tell the exact same story, full of sh1t too right?

Keep supporting sexual abusers.

Says the guy who voted for and supports a racist, rapist and kid Toucher 🌈 😂 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

A judge concluded in August 2023, when dismissing Trump’s countersuit against Carroll, that the claim Trump raped Carroll was “substantially true.” The judge wrote that Trump “raped” her in the broader sense of that word, as people generally understand it, though not as it is narrowly defined by New York state law.

Also they settled, they didn't pay trump, they will pay a charity.

I'll still say he raped her, but if being a sexual abuser is more sanitizing for trump ball lockers then go right ahead.

 

4 hours ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

And the dozens of other women who tell the exact same story, full of sh1t too right?

Keep supporting sexual abusers.

Wicked people can’t stop supporting the wicked things people do, they judge, because they feel judged.  

Matthew 3:17.   And lo a voice from Heaven, Saying, this is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.   Indeed Amen Thanks 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

A judge concluded in August 2023, when dismissing Trump’s countersuit against Carroll, that the claim Trump raped Carroll was “substantially true.” The judge wrote that Trump “raped” her in the broader sense of that word, as people generally understand it, though not as it is narrowly defined by New York state law.

Also they settled, they didn't pay trump, they will pay a charity.

I'll still say he raped her, but if being a sexual abuser is more sanitizing for trump ball lockers then go right ahead.

Like he grabbed her by the 🙀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

And the dozens of other women who tell the exact same story, full of sh1t too right?

Keep supporting sexual abusers.

😆 Enjoy the losing loser. It's just the beginning. :banana:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Was he convicted of it?

That doesn't matter. In a politically activist New York court, where motivated prosecutors and judges collude, they can, do, have, and will convict Trump of any fantasy they dream up. everyone sees through the sham, except maybe a handful of retards who may well be pretending to not see though it, its hard to tell when people are that stupid to begin with.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though I don’t believe Carroll’s claims, this seems like semantics based on the ruling.

Also seems as if this would open the door for defamation lawsuits against Trump from folks such as the residents of Springfield Ohio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Even though I don’t believe Carroll’s claims, this seems like semantics based on the ruling.

Also seems as if this would open the door for defamation lawsuits against Trump from folks such as the residents of Springfield Ohio.

Sounds good. When the "residents" of Springfield show up to court to make their case, Homan can scoop them up and ship them back to Haiti.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Even though I don’t believe Carroll’s claims, this seems like semantics based on the ruling.

Also seems as if this would open the door for defamation lawsuits against Trump from folks such as the residents of Springfield Ohio.

Idiot thinks the differences between misdemeanors and felonies are semantics. Don’t feel bad, plenty of other idiots around here do too, when it’s convenient. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

If being a sexual abuser is more sanitizing for trump ball lockers then go right ahead.

This is kinda the crux of my argument for calling it semantics.  IANAL, but defamation requires damages.  Is there really any damage by saying someone is a “rapist” vs “sexual abuser”?  @Engorgeous George?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess there isn’t much difference between grabbing someone’s ass and raping them. Semantics. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's funny to watch the liberals whine about Trump being innocent of charges. It's all they have left in their pitiful lives. 

The focking idiots. 

What a scourge on this country the liberals are. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I guess there isn’t much difference between grabbing someone’s ass and raping them. Semantics. 

You're ok with a woman being fisted against her will but as long as it's not a d

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

You're ok with a woman being fisted against her will but as long as it's not a d

😆 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

😆 Enjoy the losing loser. It's just the beginning. :banana:

Posted at 3 am Sunday morning. :( 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, MDC said:

Posted at 3 am Sunday morning. :( 

Posted at 1pm on Sunday afternoon. 😐

WTF? What a flaming weirdo. 😆

And it was actually 1am that I posted for the record. 😆

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Even though I don’t believe Carroll’s claims, this seems like semantics based on the ruling.

Also seems as if this would open the door for defamation lawsuits against Trump from folks such as the residents of Springfield Ohio.

Trump is a news agency who accused specific individuals of felony offenses?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HT thinks rape, vengeance, bluster and bullying are valued qualities in an alpha male.

And this was a settlement, with the money going to charity. 

The parent company makes about $60 billion a year, so that $15 million is a molecule in a drop in the bucket.

But MAGAturds are jumping up and down like a bunch of rock apes over it. 

Woo!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Death said:

HT thinks rape, vengeance, bluster and bullying are valued qualities in an alpha male.

And this was a settlement, with the money going to charity. 

The parent company makes about $60 billion a year, so that $15 million is a molecule in a drop in the bucket.

But MAGAturds are jumping up and down like a bunch of rock apes over it. 

Woo!

Pimpledoosh thinks fake rape accusations are real. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Such a great feature:

Quote

You've chosen to ignore content by seafoam1.

:first:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Death said:

HT thinks rape, vengeance, bluster and bullying are valued qualities in an alpha male.

And this was a settlement, with the money going to charity. 

The parent company makes about $60 billion a year, so that $15 million is a molecule in a drop in the bucket.

But MAGAturds are jumping up and down like a bunch of rock apes over it. 

Woo!

It's pretty disgraceful for ABC to settle.  More media bending to authoritarianism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

It's pretty disgraceful for ABC to settle.  More media bending to authoritarianism.

MAGAturds scream about free speech but would cheer Clownzo's attempts to shut down media that disagrees and criticizes him. 

I just hope there are enough level-headed Republicans who can keep him in check.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Death said:

And this was a settlement, with the money going to charity. 

Not if Trump can help it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

It's pretty disgraceful for ABC to settle.  More media bending to authoritarianism.

Settled?  What they did was a LITERAL text book case of slander.   Are you a f'n retard?  Never mind.  We know you are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Settled?  What they did was a LITERAL text book case of slander.   Are you a f'n retard?  Never mind.  We know you are.

Yes it was a settlement, never went to trial.

And trump would have to prove that his reputation was damaged which would have been difficult.  He also would have had to spend time on this instead of his presidency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Yes it was a settlement, never went to trial.

And trump would have to prove that his reputation was damaged which would have been difficult.  He also would have had to spend time on this instead of his presidency.

Trump 2024 bltch. :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×