Electors met today to cast their votes

[lickin_starfish 1,790]

https://www.270towin.com/2024-vote-of-electors/

Next stop, Jan 6th! 

[thegeneral 2,502]

It’s a nice process when there’s not some losing, whiny bltch focking it all up.

[MDC 6,779]

When do the fake electors vote to overturn the vote?

[Strike 4,818]

Some of the electors who will be voting are still being prosecuted for being "fake" electors in 2020:

https://www.npr.org/2024/12/17/nx-s1-5225588/trump-electoral-college-vote-nevada-fake-electors-michigan

[Tree of Knowledge 1,447]

Too big to rig.  Trumpslide 2024!!!!

MAGA!!!!

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,057]

there has never been fake electors, there have been opposing electors to cast ballots in case a court case overturns it but dems don't know history or civics

 

[IGotWorms 4,038]

10 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

there has never been fake electors, there have been opposing electors to cast ballots in case a court case overturns it but dems don't know history or civics

 

[Patented Phil 1,293]

4 hours ago, thegeneral said:

It’s a nice process when there’s not some losing, whiny bltch focking it all up.

You’re a funny guy, General.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,174]

Another step in our nations healing process. 

[The Phantom's Phantom 232]

3 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

there has never been fake electors, there have been opposing electors to cast ballots in case a court case overturns it but dems don't know history or civics

 

Holy sh1t you people are lost.

It's true about Trump shooting someone in the middle of the street and you idiots would make excuses for him.

[Voltaire 4,972]

1 minute ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Holy sh1t you people are lost.

It's true about Trump shooting someone in the middle of the street and you idiots would make excuses for him.

I always thought that was hyperbole but after seeing the widespread shrugging response to Luigi Mangioni, maybe there's something to work with after all.

 

[lickin_starfish 1,790]

34 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

I always thought that was hyperbole but after seeing the widespread shrugging response to Luigi Mangioni, maybe there's something to work with after all.

 

Luigi supporters and Kamala supporters overlap on a Venn diagram.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,057]

1 hour ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Holy sh1t you people are lost.

It's true about Trump shooting someone in the middle of the street and you idiots would make excuses for him.

So every single election there is two sets of electors. Do some research child 

[thegeneral 2,502]

4 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

So every single election there is two sets of electors. Do some research child 

How often does the Prez who lost try and get his VP to toss out the electors

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,057]

36 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

How often does the Prez who lost try and get his VP to toss out the electors

what does what I have said have anything to do with that?

what I do know is that every election there are states electors that are challenged and rejected, just its only bad cause orange man

 

[thegeneral 2,502]

4 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

what does what I have said have anything to do with that?

what I do know is that every election there are states electors that are challenged and rejected, just its only bad cause orange man

 

You are acting as if the 2020 act was business as usual. It wasn’t.

His plan was to get his VP to toss out the electors and replace them with ones who would then give the States that he lost to him.

In this case it was Orange Man Bad.

How do you not see this?

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,057]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

You are acting as if the 2020 act was business as usual. It wasn’t.

His plan was to get his VP to toss out the electors and replace them with ones who would then give the States that he lost to him.

In this case it was Orange Man Bad.

How do you not see this?

I saw exactly what it was

people are allowed to challenge the election, we have a process in place.  I have zero problem with this, just as you had zero problem with it any other time it was used to challenge the electoral college

in all cases the Vice President made the decision not to debate the substance, whats the problem?

except of course the one time a state was given to fake electors from Hawaii turned from red to blue

[IGotWorms 4,038]

Will there be a riot at the Capitol?

Will someone try to kill the VP?

Oh wait, that’s Kamala. Damn! That complicates things

[thegeneral 2,502]

14 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

I saw exactly what it was

people are allowed to challenge the election, we have a process in place.  I have zero problem with this, just as you had zero problem with it any other time it was used to challenge the electoral college

in all cases the Vice President made the decision not to debate the substance, whats the problem?

except of course the one time a state was given to fake electors from Hawaii turned from red to blue

Again what Trump did in 2020 was well beyond what had occurred in the past.

Here’s what occurred in Hawaii that election wasn’t close, what occurred there wasn’t similar to 2020. There wasn’t an effort to overturn multiple State counts based on piles of bullshet. 

You don’t have a problem with it because you are a fan. If a Dem pulled this shet that Trump did you’d be filling your pants. 

That the giant pussay Pence didn’t go along with this, while mostly self preservation, was one redeeming act of his.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,057]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Again what Trump did in 2020 was well beyond what had occurred in the past.

Here’s what occurred in Hawaii that election wasn’t close, what occurred there wasn’t similar to 2020. There wasn’t an effort to overturn multiple State counts based on piles of bullshet. 

You don’t have a problem with it because you are a fan. If a Dem pulled this shet that Trump did you’d be filling your pants. 

That the giant pussay Pence didn’t go along with this, while mostly self preservation, was one redeeming act of his.

cool story bro, cry 4 more years, I could care less if anyone does anything

I don't have a problem with anyone who does anything within the guidelines, which had occurred, the right to challenge an election is part of our constitution.  I won't say a word when democrats challenge electors this time either

the only thing I am a fan of is watching liberals cry, just like I like watching jeezus freaks like Weepaws spread nonsense and cry

[thegeneral 2,502]

1 minute ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

cool story bro, cry 4 more years, I could care less if anyone does anything

I don't have a problem with anyone who does anything within the guidelines, which had occurred, the right to challenge an election is part of our constitution.  I won't say a word when democrats challenge electors this time either

the only thing I am a fan of is watching liberals cry, just like I like watching jeezus freaks like Weepaws spread nonsense and cry

Yeah you just ignored history and act as if this is totally normal and everyone does it! It’s a joke. Don’t be a dumbass.

It’s awesome that the guy who is Prez, a job with unlimited power, who has consolidated even more power via a conservative Supreme Court is back in charge…because it makes Libs cry! 

Such a weird reaction but whatever

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,057]

18 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Yeah you just ignored history and act as if this is totally normal and everyone does it! It’s a joke. Don’t be a dumbass.

It’s awesome that the guy who is Prez, a job with unlimited power, who has consolidated even more power via a conservative Supreme Court is back in charge…because it makes Libs cry! 

Such a weird reaction but whatever

wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.  Ignored history!!!!!!!!!!!!! blah blah blah, just cause it hasn't been done the exact same way, doesn't mean there is anything wrong with it.  You probably cried about Mcconnell blocking Garland too

just think it would be over in a month if you retards wouldn't have constantly lied 

the supreme court should be conservative, of course youre one of those "centrists" who always votes red, but anti trump right?  Think the supreme court should be loaded with activists rather than constitutionalists

 

[The Phantom's Phantom 232]

7 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

So every single election there is two sets of electors. Do some research child 

That's not what happened here ignoramus.

The fake electors in 7 states forged documents saying that Trump won and sent them to DC in hopes that Pence would honor them.  He didn't, Biden won, and dozens of these fake electors were indicted and please guilty to felony charges.

Your ignorance is simply astounding.

[Tree of Knowledge 1,447]

8 hours ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

Holy sh1t you people are lost.

It's true about Trump shooting someone in the middle of the street and you idiots would make excuses for him.

If he shot a CEO of an insurance company, it might cure TDS.  

[jbycho 217]

14 hours ago, thegeneral said:

It’s a nice process when there’s not some losing, whiny bltch focking it all up.

You should sit this one out then. 

[supermike80 1,600]

I wonder how long libs are gonna cling to 2020.   My goodness

[thegeneral 2,502]

16 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

I wonder how long libs are gonna cling to 2020.   My goodness

It is being pointed out that 2020 was not just gee whiz run of the mill election challenges. 

[supermike80 1,600]

Just now, thegeneral said:

It is being pointed out that 2020 was not just gee whiz run of the mill election challenges. 

Weeee.....so again, how long will you hang on to it?   8 years?   16?  40?  Rest of your life?

[lickin_starfish 1,790]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

It is being pointed out that 2020 was not just gee whiz run of the mill election challenges. 

Things a conspiracy nut would say.

[thegeneral 2,502]

7 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

Weeee.....so again, how long will you hang on to it?   8 years?   16?  40?  Rest of your life?

What was the point of this thread?

There are people citing 1960 Hawaiian elections to act as if it was normal.

[thegeneral 2,502]

8 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

Things a conspiracy nut would say.

This is rich, lickin starfish. Post some more crackpot meme screencaps

[Hardcore troubadour 14,174]

16 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

Weeee.....so again, how long will you hang on to it?   8 years?   16?  40?  Rest of your life?

What else , at this point do they have? Everything they support has been an undisputed failure.  Joy! 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,057]

3 hours ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

That's not what happened here ignoramus.

The fake electors in 7 states forged documents saying that Trump won and sent them to DC in hopes that Pence would honor them.  He didn't, Biden won, and dozens of these fake electors were indicted and please guilty to felony charges.

Your ignorance is simply astounding.

exactly what the electors are supposed to do

republican electors didn't forge anything, they signed their elector ballots as official and it is up to the VP and senate/house if challenges are there to choose which group of electors to use per state

its basic civics, there are signed papers for california every year for both slates of electors, republicans are just following how the current system works

now libtards want to ABOLISH the system in place and remove the electoral college, that is the real threat to democracy

 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,057]

1 hour ago, thegeneral said:

It is being pointed out that 2020 was not just gee whiz run of the mill election challenges. 

it was being pointed out that 2020 was not just gee whiz run of the mill election

Pennsylvania for example absolutely 100% broke their own election rules

 

[The Phantom's Phantom 232]

11 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

exactly what the electors are supposed to do

republican electors didn't forge anything, they signed their elector ballots as official and it is up to the VP and senate/house if challenges are there to choose which group of electors to use per state

its basic civics, there are signed papers for california every year for both slates of electors, republicans are just following how the current system works

now libtards want to ABOLISH the system in place and remove the electoral college, that is the real threat to democracy

 

  You're a 100% wrong.  That's not what is supposed to happen.

https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/roles

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fake-michigan-certificate-of-votes-mailed-to-u-s-senate-after-2020-presidential-vote-official-says

You keep saying basic civics but you're just making sh1t up

[The Phantom's Phantom 232]

16 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

it was being pointed out that 2020 was not just gee whiz run of the mill election

Pennsylvania for example absolutely 100% broke their own election rules

 

I wonder how long Maga are gonna cling to 2020.   My goodness

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,057]

6 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

I wonder how long Maga are gonna cling to 2020.   My goodness

I am happy the way 2020 went, proved how big of idiots libtards are

 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,057]

8 minutes ago, The Phantom's Phantom said:

  You're a 100% wrong.  That's not what is supposed to happen.

https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/roles

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fake-michigan-certificate-of-votes-mailed-to-u-s-senate-after-2020-presidential-vote-official-says

You keep saying basic civics but you're just making sh1t up

cool opinion piece by left wing rag 

guess what, there have been Kamala electors who have cast their votes in Texas this year

The first part of the process is controlled by the political parties in each State and varies from State to State. Generally, the parties either nominate slates of potential electors at their State party conventions or they chose them by a vote of the party's central committee. This happens in each State for each party by whatever rules the State party and (sometimes) the national party have for the process. This first part of the process results in each Presidential candidate having their own unique slate of potential electors.

Political parties often choose individuals for the slate to recognize their service and dedication to that political party. They may be State elected officials, State party leaders, or people in the State who have a personal or political affiliation with their party's Presidential candidate. (For specific information about how slates of potential electors are chosen, contact the political parties in each State.)

[thegeneral 2,502]

20 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

exactly what the electors are supposed to do

republican electors didn't forge anything, they signed their elector ballots as official and it is up to the VP and senate/house if challenges are there to choose which group of electors to use per state

its basic civics, there are signed papers for california every year for both slates of electors, republicans are just following how the current system works

now libtards want to ABOLISH the system in place and remove the electoral college, that is the real threat to democracy

 

In this Hawaii thing that they told you to hang your hat on. The election was decided by 100 votes in the first presidential election they participated. The State was missing deadlines on recounts. The EC votes from this State was meaningless and the VP selected the group that was against his own interests as it became apparent that he did in fact lose the State and he felt it was the proper president to set. There were no cries about  a stolen election or voter fraud claims.

It’s an absurd thing to bring up.

If in this past election Kamala was working to flip say Wisconsin (which she lost by fewer votes than Trump did) because of some made up fever dream scenarios that a bunch of kooks were spouting something tells me your civics lesson would sound a bit different .

But of course this didn’t happen because Trump is a special kind of oddball who has a mental problem with accepting loss.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,057]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

In this Hawaii thing that they told you to hang your hat on. The election was decided by 100 votes in the first presidential election they participated. The State was missing deadlines on recounts. The EC votes from this State was meaningless and the VP selected the group that was against his own interests as it became apparent that he did in fact lose the State and he felt it was the proper president to set. There were no cries about  a stolen election or voter fraud claims.

It’s an absurd thing to bring up.

If in this past election Kamala was working to flip say Wisconsin (which she lost by fewer votes than Trump did) because of some made up fever dream scenarios that a bunch of kooks were spouting something tells me your civics lesson would sound a bit different .

But of course this didn’t happen because Trump is a special kind of oddball who has a mental problem with accepting loss.

I would have no problem whatsoever if Kamala challenged Wisconsin and Wisconsin decided that because of litigation both slates of electors should be sent to congress

go for it, its your constitutional right to challenge and deny every and all elections among everything else