Trump says Rachel Maddow is "the enemy of the people"

[Nomad99 670]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

Almost sounds like a a threat, don't it? Is he hinting that he may try to have her taken off the air?

https://www.newsbreak.com/news/3776965676753-enemy-of-the-people-trump-rages-at-rachel-maddow-in-middle-of-the-night-attack?noAds=1&_f=app_share&s=i2

'Enemy of the people!' Trump rages at Rachel Maddow in middle of the night attack

Hours after Donald Trump took to his Truth Social account to celebrate the confirmation of embattled Fox News personality Pete Hegseth to be the next secretary of defense despite allegations of sexual assault and public drunkenness, he returned to attack MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.

The popular Maddow, a frequent critic of the president dating back to his first term that ended in 2020, recently returned to full-time nightly duty on the network to the delight of her fans.

[...]

Based on Trump's late-night post, he's not happy that she will be back to plague him five nights a week.

On Truth Social he launched an attack aimed at Maddow, her network, and CNN.

"Wow! Rachel Maddow has horrible ratings. She’ll be off the air very soon. MSNBC IS CLOSE TO DEATH. CNN HAS REACHED THE BOTTOM. This is a good thing," he wrote before adding, " They are the Enemy of the people!"

 

You mean like silenced? You mean like censored? You mean like blocked from social media? What kind of horrible people would do that to someone??? The pot, kettle, black society

[The Real timschochet 5,633]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

CNN a long time ago, maybe.  MSNBC never but both now are voices of Liberal Tokyo Rose.  When students read and talk about "propaganda" in the future, CNN, MSNBC will be at the top of the example list.

Sorry, Tim.  You're on the wrong side of history yet again.

History isn’t a question of popularity. 

[seafoam1 2,617]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Reason doesn’t sell, never has. Anger, populism, nativism sells. Conspiracy theories sell. Fox will always do great. 

 

10 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

They have to compete with CNN as the main voice of reason these days. But CNN appears to be abandoning that role so I expect MSNBC to do much better in the months to come. 

Reason doesn’t sell, . Anger, populism, nativism sells. Conspiracy theories sells, so I expect MSNBC to do much better in the months to come. 

Nice. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,596]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

History isn’t a question of popularity. 

It isn't?  Your side has been trying to revise history for at least a decade or more now so your statement is as false as it is absurd.

[The Real timschochet 5,633]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

It isn't?  Your side has been trying to revise history for at least a decade or more now so your statement is as false as it is absurd.

If 90% of the public was rooting for the Commanders to win, it wouldn’t matter; they still lost. 

[weepaws 3,062]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

If 90% of the public was rooting for the Commanders to win, it wouldn’t matter; they still lost. 

I think 90% where rooting for the eagles, and they won.  

Matthew 10:34.  Think not that I am coming to send peace on earth, I come not to send peace, but a sword.  Indeed Amen Thanks 

[seafoam1 2,617]

8 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

If 90% of the public was rooting for the Commanders to win, it wouldn’t matter; they still lost. 

Well, whatever % of us voted for Trump, and bet on Philly -6 and Hurts over 200 passing yards, we are on a roll. 

[Gepetto 1,215]

47 minutes ago, Death said:

How was his mouth limited?

He freely spouted his Sandy Hook conspiracy nonsense and got his ass kicked in court, and he later admitted that he was wrong. 

He's still free to say whatever he wants, and if Maddow has opened herself to legal exposure for what she says, people are free to file a lawsuit against her as well.

 

I think you know what I meant. If not, oh well. I'm not here to debate.

[Maximum Overkill 1,580]

24 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

If 90% of the public was rooting for the Commanders to win, it wouldn’t matter; they still lost. 

GO BIRDS! 

[Death 296]

52 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I was against Obama jailing journalists. 

Are you for free speech for CNN, MSNBC and Rachel Maddow?

[Death 296]

10 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

I think you know what I meant. If not, oh well. I'm not here to debate.

No, I don't know what you mean. 

No one tried shut down his free speech.

Are you for Rachel Maddow's free speech?

[Death 296]

1 hour ago, CaptainObvious1 said:

No, I'm not taking anything you say seriously when you sound like a 7 year-old throwing a fit.  Especially when you turn around and claim you want a serious discussion.  You're a troll.  You've admitted it.  Everyone here knows it.

This is a serious question that none of you MAGAs will answer. 

Pretty simple question: Are you for MSNBC, CNN and Rachel Maddow having free speech?

 

[Death 296]

39 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

CNN a long time ago, maybe.  MSNBC never but both now are voices of Liberal Tokyo Rose.  When students read and talk about "propaganda" in the future, CNN, MSNBC will be at the top of the example list.

Sorry, Tim.  You're on the wrong side of history yet again.

Are you for MSNBC, CNN and Rachel Maddow having free speech?

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,596]

Death really is triggered!  Furiously posting from his mom's basement as fast as he can type.

#winning

[CaptainObvious1 199]

5 minutes ago, Death said:

This is a serious question that none of you MAGAs will answer. 

Pretty simple question: Are you for MSNBC, CNN and Rachel Maddow having free speech?

 

You're right I'm not answering you because you're a troll with your MagaTurd, Muh Trump, Clownzo stuff.  

[Death 296]

Just now, CaptainObvious1 said:

You're right I'm not answering you because you're a troll with your MagaTurd, Muh Trump, Clownzo stuff.  

The trolling, sarcasm and wisecracks go both ways, and I'm asking a serious question that the MAGAs here deflect with this kind of baloney.

You don't want to answer it because your answer is that you are not OK with CNN, MSNBC, Rachel Maddow or ANYTHING left of Fox News to have the right to free speech, and you'd be giddy if Trump found a way to shut that down.

And the non-answer from you, HT and others underscores my point about your thirst for a one-party autocracy with an unchecked leader with ungodly dictator powers. 

[CaptainObvious1 199]

32 minutes ago, Death said:

The trolling, sarcasm and wisecracks go both ways, and I'm asking a serious question that the MAGAs here deflect with this kind of baloney.

You don't want to answer it because your answer is that you are not OK with CNN, MSNBC, Rachel Maddow or ANYTHING left of Fox News to have the right to free speech, and you'd be giddy if Trump found a way to shut that down.

And the non-answer from you, HT and others underscores my point about your thirst for a one-party autocracy with an unchecked leader with ungodly dictator powers. 

Another reason I'm not answering you.  You've already decided your answer for everyone and just looking to troll again.  If you can find a quote from me supporting something, go for it.  If not, just STFU.

[Horseman 2,132]

42 minutes ago, Death said:

Are you for MSNBC, CNN and Rachel Maddow having free speech?

Hell yes. Look where it got them this cycle.  You and Tim might just be the last two watching MSDNC.  

Shouldn't be able to call it news when it's not news tho. 

[seafoam1 2,617]

1 minute ago, Horseman said:

Hell yes. Look where it got them this cycle.  You and Tim might just be the last two watching MSDNC.  

Shouldn't be able to call it news when it's not news tho. 

The liberals need to get their talking points from somewhere. 

[Death 296]

Just now, CaptainObvious1 said:

Another reason I'm not answering you.  You've already decided your answer for everyone and just looking to troll again.  If you can find a quote from me supporting something, go for it.  If not, just STFU.

I've said before that I support the free speech of Trump and Alex Jones. There are potential consequences for irresponsible free speech - like slander, libel, harmful misinformation and inappropriate content.

Studio Movie Grill isn't limiting free speech by not showing hardcore pornography.

But your deflections speak volumes.

You'd be giddy if Trump somehow shut down NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC and other entities that MAGA considers "MSM," which only includes media that produces informaton with which they disagree, so they don't count Fox.

I'm looking forward to Rachel Maddow getting under his skin - and yours - for the next four years.

You can STFU me all you want, but I'm just exercising my free speech!

[Death 296]

3 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Hell yes. Look where it got them this cycle.  You and Tim might just be the last two watching MSDNC.  

Shouldn't be able to call it news when it's not news tho. 

See, now that's a good answer.

I watch everything, by the way.

Fox is no more or less "news" than CNN.

[CaptainObvious1 199]

2 minutes ago, Death said:

I've said before that I support the free speech of Trump and Alex Jones. There are potential consequences for irresponsible free speech - like slander, libel, harmful misinformation and inappropriate content.

Studio Movie Grill isn't limiting free speech by not showing hardcore pornography.

But your deflections speak volumes.

You'd be giddy if Trump somehow shut down NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC and other entities that MAGA considers "MSM," which only includes media that produces informaton with which they disagree, so they don't count Fox.

I'm looking forward to Rachel Maddow getting under his skin - and yours - for the next four years.

You can STFU me all you want, but I'm just exercising my free speech!

You keep putting words in my mouth, and others too, to justify your trolling.  It's Daulton level stupidity.  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,426]

54 minutes ago, Death said:

Are you for free speech for CNN, MSNBC and Rachel Maddow?

Of course. You only care because Trump! You didn’t care when Obama was arresting and jailing journalists. 

[Death 296]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Of course. You only care because Trump! You didn’t care when Obama was arresting and jailing journalists. 

When did I ever say that?

I was appauled at how Obama handled information and did not vote for him,.

[Horseman 2,132]

7 minutes ago, Death said:

See, now that's a good answer.

I watch everything, by the way.

Fox is no more or less "news" than CNN.

Trump has free speech too, to say "Enemy of the People".  So you can dial it back.  

[Dizkneelande 1,039]

Trying to figure out of this list which of these conspiracies netted the corrupted media the most since they sell so well according to fatboy.

- Russia collusion
- Hunter Biden laptop
- Charlottesville
- Bubba Wallace
- Jussie Smollett
- Covington Catholic students
- Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot
- COVID lab leak was a “conspiracy theory”
- Steele dossier
- Don’t Say Gay was in the bill
- Migrant “kids In cages”
- GA election integrity was the new “Jim crow”
- Duke lacrosse kids
- Jan 6 video footage
- “Peaceful” BLM riots
- Ivermectin is a horse dewormer
- Trump used teargas to clear a crowd for a bible photo

[Reality 3,061]

Cry more.

[seafoam1 2,617]

7 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Trump has free speech too, to say "Enemy of the People".  So you can dial it back.  

Asking a liberal to dial it back is like asking a rabid rottweiler to stop chewing on an old woman it's got it's teeth sunk into.  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,426]

9 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Trying to figure out of this list which of these conspiracies netted the corrupted media the most since they sell so well according to fatboy.

- Russia collusion
- Hunter Biden laptop
- Charlottesville
- Bubba Wallace
- Jussie Smollett
- Covington Catholic students
- Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot
- COVID lab leak was a “conspiracy theory”
- Steele dossier
- Don’t Say Gay was in the bill
- Migrant “kids In cages”
- GA election integrity was the new “Jim crow”
- Duke lacrosse kids
- Jan 6 video footage
- “Peaceful” BLM riots
- Ivermectin is a horse dewormer
- Trump used teargas to clear a crowd for a bible photo

When you put it that way…..damn, lefties fall for it again and again. 

[Dizkneelande 1,039]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

When you put it that way…..damn, lefties fall for it again and again. 

I probably forgot more than what’s on the list. Biden is as sharp as ever and not in obvious cognitive decline. Let’s keep it going.

[jonmx 2,301]

1 hour ago, Death said:

Are you for free speech for CNN, MSNBC and Rachel Maddow?

I am for free speech for all people, including Trump calling Maddow a POS.

[seafoam1 2,617]

5 minutes ago, jonmx said:

I am for free speech for all people, including Trump calling Maddow a POS.

Maddow is like a lesbian cartoon character, Only not as smart or charismatic as Peppermint Patty.

But her girlfriend does call her "Sir", so there's that. 

[Gepetto 1,215]

1 hour ago, Death said:

Are you for MSNBC, CNN and Rachel Maddow having free speech?

United States affirmed that the First Amendment is not absolute, "you can't shout fire in a crowded theater" is frequently used as a red herring when discussing whether or not a particular instance of speech falls under exceptions set by the Supreme Court.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,596]

39 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Trying to figure out of this list which of these conspiracies netted the corrupted media the most since they sell so well according to fatboy.

- Russia collusion
- Hunter Biden laptop
- Charlottesville
- Bubba Wallace
- Jussie Smollett
- Covington Catholic students
- Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot
- COVID lab leak was a “conspiracy theory”
- Steele dossier
- Don’t Say Gay was in the bill
- Migrant “kids In cages”
- GA election integrity was the new “Jim crow”
- Duke lacrosse kids
- Jan 6 video footage
- “Peaceful” BLM riots
- Ivermectin is a horse dewormer
- Trump used teargas to clear a crowd for a bible photo

So many hoaxes to choose from. Damn liberals fall for the dumbest s***.  They're so easy to fool.

[seafoam1 2,617]

4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

So many hoaxes to choose from. Damn liberals fall for the dumbest s***.  They're so easy to fool.

And some how, some way, they never ever fall for the truth. It's like they have this uncanny radar for the dumbest, most ludicrous, unimaginable lies they could possibly fall for. 

[BunnysBastatrds 2,175]

I wouldn’t finger her with Deaths fingers

[squistion 1,776]

45 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

United States affirmed that the First Amendment is not absolute, "you can't shout fire in a crowded theater" is frequently used as a red herring when discussing whether or not a particular instance of speech falls under exceptions set by the Supreme Court.

So...Rachel Maddow being critical of Trump on MSNBC is like shouting fire in a crowded theater? Yeah, that makes sense. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,580]

8 minutes ago, squistion said:

So...Rachel Maddow being critical of Trump

Lies lies lies 

[seafoam1 2,617]

1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Lies lies lies 

Liberals believe the ghost stories they are told by their masters.

[RLLD 3,986]

I mean, he is not exactly “wrong”.  Maddie represents a segment of Democrats mouthpieces dedicated to empowerment of a political party at the expense of the people