Frozenbeernuts 2,038 Posted March 25 It seems odd that out of all the people they accidentally added, it was a journalist who hates Trump that they add. It may have been on purpose. To what end? Idk. We will probably never know for sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 2,816 Posted March 25 Marco Rubio just texted me the Ukrainian peace plans. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,756 Posted March 25 34 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said: It seems odd that out of all the people they accidentally added, it was a journalist who hates Trump that they add. It may have been on purpose. To what end? Idk. We will probably never know for sure. Maybe to smoke out a dirty rat? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,038 Posted March 25 5 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Maybe to smoke out a dirty rat? Possible. Trump has done that before. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 485 Posted March 25 1 hour ago, Tebok said: Here are some details of the attack that the Atlantic journalist knew about. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c05mvr3j3yro Just say you don't know. You have already been exposed. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 485 Posted March 25 40 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Marco Rubio just texted me the Ukrainian peace plans. Nobody texts you anything gutterboy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tebok 226 Posted March 25 9 minutes ago, jbycho said: Just say you don't know. You have already been exposed. I've posted details and yet you keep retreating into this weird "show me the details" space, because you're a moron. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tebok 226 Posted March 25 53 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said: It seems odd that out of all the people they accidentally added, it was a journalist who hates Trump that they add. It may have been on purpose. To what end? Idk. We will probably never know for sure. Because he's a stupid ass. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 485 Posted March 25 3 minutes ago, Tebok said: I've posted details and yet you keep retreating into this weird "show me the details" space, because you're a moron. You have posted no details.Just accusations. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 2,816 Posted March 25 11 minutes ago, jbycho said: Nobody texts you anything gutterboy. Besides your mom! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tebok 226 Posted March 25 39 minutes ago, jbycho said: You have posted no details.Just accusations. You take dumbness to new levels. I could post the minute-by-minute execution of the strikes, and you'd still be "No details. I'm a dumbass." lol. Go to bed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 485 Posted March 25 18 minutes ago, Tebok said: You take dumbness to new levels. I could post the minute-by-minute execution of the strikes, and you'd still be "No details. I'm a dumbass." lol. Go to bed. You have said nothing rusty. You have no clue. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,401 Posted March 25 This is like equivalent to an Ohio State staff member losing their playbook an hour before kickoff in a Kennesaw State game Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 997 Posted March 25 Pete hegseth's response is a true display of his character. He first denigrates the reporter and then he denies that it happened. He has to resign. We know that this won't be investigated. It will be swept under the rug. But even someone as despicable as Trump has to realize that someone needs to go down for this shocking display of incompetency. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,684 Posted March 25 25 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: He has to resign This we agree on. However, the reporter has to take a separate blame. They never should of went public with that info. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,024 Posted March 25 23 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said: This we agree on. However, the reporter has to take a separate blame. They never should have went public with that info. Why not? If Goldberg didn’t go public, they would’ve gone on discussing classified military info on Signal. We should be thanking him. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,420 Posted March 25 5 hours ago, iam90sbaby said: This is like equivalent to an Ohio State staff member losing their playbook an hour before kickoff in a Kennesaw State game Actually it is more like sending the play call to the game announcer after the play had happened. At the time it was recieved it was obvious what had happened. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,420 Posted March 25 9 minutes ago, MDC said: Why not? If Goldberg didn’t go public, they would’ve gone on discussing classified military info on Signal. We should be thanking him. Signal is an encrypted method of communication that intelligence agencies use when they are outside of secured rooms and don't have access to SIPR. It is far better than using standard text messaging, as long as you are not stupid enough to add a reporter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,792 Posted March 25 What Lloyd Austin did was much worse. The liberals here are such hypocrites. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,005 Posted March 25 12 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said: Why is the govt using signal??? Just a guess, and these were things said about Hilary/server, to avoid having to turn over documented conversations. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,901 Posted March 25 1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said: Pete hegseth's response is a true display of his character. He first denigrates the reporter and then he denies that it happened. He has to resign. We know that this won't be investigated. It will be swept under the rug. But even someone as despicable as Trump has to realize that someone needs to go down for this shocking display of incompetency. To be fair- Michael Waltz is the one who added the reporter. Hegseth was relaying plans over the text chat because he (wrongfully) assumed it was a closed loop among the admin. He is trying to protect his admin brothers but it comes off really bad. Vance looks dumb too because he contradicted the President and then tried to deny this ever happened while the White House was confirming it. I will say the same thing about this I did about Hillary. It should be investigated. If something more comes of it then do something from a legal level. Otherwise it is up to the admin to self police. Which means they won't do anything. And the regular bootlickers (jonmx) and sycophants here (you can see them) will just try to wash it away like it never happened. Trying to blame the reporter is especially hilarious. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,005 Posted March 25 10 hours ago, thegeneral said: Marco Rubio just texted me the Ukrainian peace plans. Why would he need to do that, President Trump has made it clear, it's give Putin everything he wants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,792 Posted March 25 Just now, Ron_Artest said: Plans to attack Yemen? Seriously just shut the fück up you troll. What Goldberg printed didn’t contain any classified material. He is however claiming to have seen classified material. Hegseth denies there was any. That’s where we are at. Sorry to hurt your feels. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,901 Posted March 25 11 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Plans to attack Yemen? Seriously just shut the fück up you troll. Look you can either believe the reporter who catalogued the entire exchange he saw with time codes and screenshots and messages...or the secretary of defense who denied any of this happened while the White house was confirming it happened..... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,792 Posted March 25 5 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Look you can either believe the reporter who catalogued the entire exchange he saw with time codes and screenshots and messages...or the secretary of defense who denied any of this happened while the White house was confirming it happened..... The White House confirmed there was classified material? I thought they just confirmed that the text thread took place. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,901 Posted March 25 Also this: "Signal is not approved by the US government for sharing sensitive information." 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,005 Posted March 25 25 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: What Goldberg printed didn’t contain any classified material. He is however claiming to have seen classified material. Hegseth denies there was any. That’s where we are at. Sorry to hurt your feels. I deny that Hegseth made that denial. Prove me wrong, oh wait you don't provide proof---you just demand it from others, so never mind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,792 Posted March 25 2 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: I deny that Hegseth made that denial. Prove me wrong, oh wait you don't provide proof---you just demand it from others, so never mind. That’s funny. You make actual accusations against people and never mind offer no proof, not even any evidence. STFU. You sound like a hysterical woman. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,792 Posted March 25 Yeah so, like I was saying, the White House acknowledged the text thread happened, but have not confirmed any classified information was in it. I guess we will have to wait for the investigation or Hegseth admitting it to find out. Goldberg hasn’t published any, that would be incredibly stupid on his part. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,420 Posted March 25 13 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Also this: "Signal is not approved by the US government for sharing sensitive information." And yet they commonly use it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,901 Posted March 25 3 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: I deny that Hegseth made that denial. Prove me wrong, oh wait you don't provide proof---you just demand it from others, so never mind. Goldberg says that he is on this text chain...classified information was shared but I won't share it. White House National Security Council spokesperson: "At this time, the message thread that was reported appears to be authentic, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain." Hegseth: “I've heard how it was characterized. Nobody was texting war plans, and that's all I have to say about that,” ______________________________________ So you can either believe Goldberg and the White House....or Hegseth? That's a toughie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,420 Posted March 25 27 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Look you can either believe the reporter who catalogued the entire exchange he saw with time codes and screenshots and messages...or the secretary of defense who denied any of this happened while the White house was confirming it happened..... They were congratulating each other on a successful mission after the fact. It was on the news shortly there after. What exactly was top secret. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,901 Posted March 25 1 minute ago, jonmx said: And yet they commonly use it. How commonly? How many times has it been used? What other things has it been used for? Was it used under Biden or Trump's first term? Please provide evidence and links that show how often it is used. TIA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,901 Posted March 25 3 minutes ago, jonmx said: They were congratulating each other on a successful mission after the fact. It was on the news shortly there after. What exactly was top secret. It was not after the fact. The reporter saw all the lead up to it. Saw the discussions, saw the plans. C'mon bootlicker. Be honest about things. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,420 Posted March 25 Just now, Sean Mooney said: How commonly? How many times has it been used? What other things has it been used for? Was it used under Biden or Trump's first term? Please provide evidence and links that show how often it is used. TIA I was directed to use signal instead of standard texting or calling in certain cases. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,792 Posted March 25 1 minute ago, jonmx said: They were congratulating each other on a successful mission after the fact. It was on the news shortly there after. What exactly was top secret. There may have been classified material in the text. We only saw parts of it. But it certainly has not been confirmed by the White House yet contrary to what the usual idiots here have claimed. Just look how emotional Honcho got when it was pointed out. They need this win big time. They may get it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,005 Posted March 25 13 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: That’s funny. You make actual accusations against people and never mind offer no proof, not even any evidence. STFU. You sound like a hysterical woman. I offer your posting history to the board as proof that you don't support what you say. Buh-bye Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,901 Posted March 25 1 minute ago, jonmx said: I was directed to use signal instead of standard texting or calling in certain cases. You work for the federal government? Just to circle back then: How commonly? How many times has it been used? What other things has it been used for? Was it used under Biden or Trump's first term? Please provide evidence and links that show how often it is used. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,420 Posted March 25 1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said: It was not after the fact. The reporter saw all the lead up to it. Saw the discussions, saw the plans. C;mon bootlicker. Be honest about things. And yet no damage was done and the mission went off successfully. The whole purpose of classifying information is to protect information which could cause harm. This information did not cause any harm. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,792 Posted March 25 Just now, Mike Honcho said: I offer your posting history to the board as proof that you don't support what you say. Buh-bye Ok bye. You have it rough enough being a minority at work so I’ll let you concentrate on that. Wait, don’t you work with like 3 people? Lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites