jbycho 482 Posted Tuesday at 01:52 PM 8 minutes ago, Fnord said: Thats still Mensa level compared to your infantile posts. Another babysitter trying to hard to look smart on the internet. Truth is, you sound smarter if you don't say anything. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 264 Posted Tuesday at 02:52 PM 8 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Again, you don’t get it. It was done legally. They manipulated the process. How else do you think you can get so many in so fast? Stay stupid for all I care. Basic level computer programmers & data experts can determine that data has been destroyed. Basically you're claiming Musk's team is cooperating in the coverup. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,470 Posted Tuesday at 02:58 PM 23 hours ago, MDC said: Plenty of hypocrisy to go around. Yeah, no crap Dlck Tracy, I said that. What I also said was that the left apparently only has a problem with it when the right does it. They sit on a pillar of moral superiority when they point it out and expect people on the right to change their voting habits when the right is called out. When they don't, they get demonized. The left has been doing this my whole life and I'm tired of their crap. I have ZERO respect for any left-wing politician and ZERO respect for any left-wing media personality. They can all fock off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,470 Posted Tuesday at 03:01 PM 23 hours ago, avoiding injuries said: This thread evolved into something nowhere close to the OP. I forget what I even clicked on to read, but this ain’t it It's because they know they've been lied to and don't want to admit it, and hence, don't want to discuss it because then they'd have to admit that Trump and the Republican party were right about Biden. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,470 Posted Tuesday at 03:05 PM 21 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: I did say I understand your point. But you're saying they should be but you don't support such a policy because the government won't enforce it the way you'd like. Fair? I'm fine with a policy that would enforce it... I just don't trust any democrat politician to write such a policy. If Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Hitler all said, "look, the sky is blue today", I'd believe them over and current Democrat politician. A worse human being has never existed in the world, than a current state or federally elected Democrat politician. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,016 Posted Tuesday at 03:06 PM 8 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said: Yeah, no crap Dlck Tracy, I said that. What I also said was that the left apparently only has a problem with it when the right does it. They sit on a pillar of moral superiority when they point it out and expect people on the right to change their voting habits when the right is called out. When they don't, they get demonized. The left has been doing this my whole life and I'm tired of their crap. I have ZERO respect for any left-wing politician and ZERO respect for any left-wing media personality. They can all fock off. Like I said, there’s plenty of hypocrisy to go around. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,470 Posted Tuesday at 03:10 PM 21 hours ago, Fnord said: For such a smart guy, you sure have trouble with typing out coherent posts. What I'm saying is that I'll believe Hyundai and whatever other companies are going to make billions in investments to manufacture more parts and cars in the US when I see the factories come online and start employing thousands of Americans. Not a moment before. I suspect these promises are just ways for companies to stall until Trump is no longer POTUS. Remember the Foxconn debacle? Got it, it's Trump's fault for trying to incentivize American businesses to do work in America to employ American's with higher paying jobs. The nerve of that guy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,900 Posted Tuesday at 03:38 PM 31 minutes ago, MDC said: Like I said, there’s plenty of hypocrisy to go around. Tbay doesn't even accept it when you do poke fun at the Democrats stuff. You didn't do it enough... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,782 Posted Tuesday at 03:48 PM 52 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Basic level computer programmers & data experts can determine that data has been destroyed. Basically you're claiming Musk's team is cooperating in the coverup. You’re not understanding it. I’ll say it again. The SS numbers were given out legally. It was possible in such large numbers because the illegal border crossing process had been manipulated prior to issuing them. Illegals caught at the border were not being detained and deported, they were being given a notice to appear and let in to the interior. I’m sorry you’re not aware that happened. But it did. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 1,986 Posted Tuesday at 05:36 PM 2 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said: Got it, it's Trump's fault for trying to incentivize American businesses to do work in America to employ American's with higher paying jobs. The nerve of that guy. Not what I said at all. The companies will wait it out before throwing billions of dollars at the U.S. Which is exactly what you'd want if you were a stockholder. Has nothing to do with Trump, directly anyway. I'll say it again: for a dude that claims he's so smart, your writing and comprehension skills really suck. Illusory superiority is endemic in MAGA world. It's why they think experts and educated people are the enemy. You seem to fit well in that paradigm. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,000 Posted Tuesday at 05:51 PM So do think that the headline "Playbook: Biden world braces for book storm" is probably the first ever usage of "book storm"? It seems to me to be a really strange metaphor. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,016 Posted Tuesday at 06:07 PM 15 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: So do think that the headline "Playbook: Biden world braces for book storm" is probably the first ever usage of "book storm"? It seems to me to be a really strange metaphor. I usually call it a booknado. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,141 Posted Tuesday at 06:09 PM 15 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: So do think that the headline "Playbook: Biden world braces for book storm" is probably the first ever usage of "book storm"? It seems to me to be a really strange metaphor. Sure. I guess we might call it "click bait" or something. My main issue being that the two authors are members of the media who participating in the cover up. So we have Tapper over at CNN pretending he was a victim and now we have these two deflecting their role by pointing at behaviors of others. Media owned the role to report honestly on this, and THEY failed, all these things are just attempts to let themselves off the hook. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,000 Posted Tuesday at 06:17 PM 6 minutes ago, RLLD said: Sure. I guess we might call it "click bait" or something. My main issue being that the two authors are members of the media who participating in the cover up. So we have Tapper over at CNN pretending he was a victim and now we have these two deflecting their role by pointing at behaviors of others. Media owned the role to report honestly on this, and THEY failed, all these things are just attempts to let themselves off the hook. My comment wasn't meant to be taken with any more meaning than I had never heard anyone putting those two words together, ever. That's all, buddy, you are putting way too much thought into - might be time to pop open a cold one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 264 Posted Tuesday at 06:36 PM 3 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said: I'm fine with a policy that would enforce it... I just don't trust any democrat politician to write such a policy. If Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Hitler all said, "look, the sky is blue today", I'd believe them over and current Democrat politician. A worse human being has never existed in the world, than a current state or federally elected Democrat politician. I understand and because of that there should be no such anti-corruption enforcement at all. Got it, done. I do feel differently but thank you for the response. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,782 Posted Tuesday at 07:00 PM 1 hour ago, Fnord said: Not what I said at all. The companies will wait it out before throwing billions of dollars at the U.S. Which is exactly what you'd want if you were a stockholder. Has nothing to do with Trump, directly anyway. I'll say it again: for a dude that claims he's so smart, your writing and comprehension skills really suck. Illusory superiority is endemic in MAGA world. It's why they think experts and educated people are the enemy. You seem to fit well in that paradigm. Experts. lol. Take down those basketball hoops! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,141 Posted Tuesday at 07:14 PM 55 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: My comment wasn't meant to be taken with any more meaning than I had never heard anyone putting those two words together, ever. That's all, buddy, you are putting way too much thought into - might be time to pop open a cold one. My longstanding issue with media is that they only seem to do their job when a Republican is in office and we all deserve the same level of effort regardless of who is residing in the White House. On top of that stance, now we see media trying to reframe the entire situation to pretend they were not complicit, and note that they are also throwing the Harris campaign under the bus a little, which is BS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,000 Posted Tuesday at 07:18 PM 2 minutes ago, RLLD said: My longstanding issue with media is that they only seem to do their job when a Republican is in office and we all deserve the same level of effort regardless of who is residing in the White House. On top of that stance, now we see media trying to reframe the entire situation to pretend they were not complicit, and note that they are also throwing the Harris campaign under the bus a little, which is BS. You are the Cameron of the bored. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,141 Posted Tuesday at 07:23 PM 5 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: You are the Cameron of the bored. One day, you will have a tangible response. Until then, we wait, patiently. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,000 Posted Tuesday at 07:29 PM 3 minutes ago, RLLD said: One day, you will have a tangible response. Until then, we wait, patiently. 1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said: So do think that the headline "Playbook: Biden world braces for book storm" is probably the first ever usage of "book storm"? It seems to me to be a really strange metaphor. 1 hour ago, RLLD said: Sure. I guess we might call it "click bait" or something. My main issue being that the two authors are members of the media who participating in the cover up. So we have Tapper over at CNN pretending he was a victim and now we have these two deflecting their role by pointing at behaviors of others. Media owned the role to report honestly on this, and THEY failed, all these things are just attempts to let themselves off the hook. My response was on the mark to anyone who respond to my above post with this. You know what you need... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,472 Posted Tuesday at 08:50 PM 2 hours ago, RLLD said: Sure. I guess we might call it "click bait" or something. My main issue being that the two authors are members of the media who participating in the cover up. So we have Tapper over at CNN pretending he was a victim and now we have these two deflecting their role by pointing at behaviors of others. Media owned the role to report honestly on this, and THEY failed, all these things are just attempts to let themselves off the hook. I don't think the majority of the media participated in the cover up. I think they were gaslit like the rest of the population. Some of the media don't care; as you point out, they willingly drink whatever blue milkshake the Democrats give them. Apparently the authors of these upcoming books, notsomuch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 264 Posted 20 hours ago On 4/1/2025 at 10:05 AM, TBayXXXVII said: On 3/31/2025 at 1:01 PM, SaintsInDome2006 said: I did say I understand your point. But you're saying they should be but you don't support such a policy because the government won't enforce it the way you'd like. Fair? I'm fine with a policy that would enforce it... I just don't trust any democrat politician to write such a policy. If Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Hitler all said, "look, the sky is blue today", I'd believe them over and current Democrat politician. A worse human being has never existed in the world, than a current state or federally elected Democrat politician. But Republicans would enforce it though, right? So, just to continue on this theme: - How much money was involved in Hunter Biden's art deal, which you raised further up? Let's just say all the awful things said about it were all true - shadow Dem donors buying Hunter's 3rd grade finger painting to help him survive his legal and financial trouble - was it like $150-200K? I'm just guessing. This is the son of the president and supposedly political benefactors are trying to help him in order to save his father, a public official (President), embarrassment. - Ok. Here is the actual President of the US issuing privately held stock to the tune of $2.3 BILLION while in office. There's no traceability, we don't know if the buyers are corporate, businessmen with interests before the White House, or foreign businessmen, politicians or even adversary states like China, Iran, North Korea or Russia. We don't know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,900 Posted 17 hours ago Will the book storm be chilling too? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,141 Posted 10 hours ago On 4/1/2025 at 4:50 PM, jerryskids said: I don't think the majority of the media participated in the cover up. I think they were gaslit like the rest of the population. Some of the media don't care; as you point out, they willingly drink whatever blue milkshake the Democrats give them. Apparently the authors of these upcoming books, notsomuch. I will disagree, in part. The legacy media has been the useful idiots for Democrats for years. They serve Democrats, protect them, while they do their job properly toward Republicans. Now, people were saying Biden was losing it for years, and the media stepped up and defended him time and again, over and over, they worked diligently for the Democrats. Ok, set that aside.... Now, these repugnant motherfockas want to start writing books about how they are indignant that they were duped? WTF??? I mean, we werent duped.....they are supposed to be non-dupable... Yet time and again they have reported bullsh!t...has to issue corrections...settle lawsuits.... When all they really had to do, was their focking job....with no political inclinations... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites