bigmarc27 24 Posted November 16, 2004 Division Leaders: North: Rodney has a 2 game lead over Dan and Vikes South: AUkid has a 2 game lead over Bernie and Myself East: Wilzone has a 2 game lead over Galt and Hoo West: Torrid has clinched North/South Wildcard: Bernie (5-5), Me (5-5), Vikes (4-6), Dan (4-6). At this point, I hold the first tie breaker over all 3 teams. My game against Bernie this weekend will likely decide who gets the playoff spot. East/West Wildcard: I'm pretty sure this one is down to Hoo and Galt. Whomever wins that matchup will likely take the Wildcard. --- Any corrections or comments? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
torridjoe 48 Posted November 16, 2004 West: Torrid has clinched Any corrections or comments? I got one, yeah: WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoisjgalt 0 Posted November 16, 2004 East/West Wildcard: I'm pretty sure this one is down to Hoo and Galt. Whomever wins that matchup will likely take the Wildcard. --- Any corrections or comments? O is still in the running. He just needs help. He needs the winner of the jgalt-ghoo game to lose his other two games, have the ld5er go 1-1 or worse in his other two, and O himself needs to win all three of his games. Not impossible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vikings4ever 538 Posted November 24, 2004 Real and Spectacular 9-3 Y Shatterer of Worlds 6-6 Greenwich Village People 6-7 Seeping Winkies 10-3 Y Jackie Chan Presents... 5-8 - Friends Of The Devil 0-13 - Hands Solo 8-5 Y Four Norsemen of the Apocalypse 5-8 - Danzone's Degenerates 4-9 - The Screaming Eagles 10-3 Z Anal Grommetts 7-6 X Mongo's Marauders 6-7 - X = Clinched playoff birth Y = Clinched division Z = Clinched first round bye - = Eliminated from the playoffs Seeping Winkies needs: -To clinch a first round bye: 1 Real And Spectacular loss/tie Real and Spectacular needs: -To clinch a first round bye: 1 win Greenwich Village People needs: -To clinch a playoff spot: 1 Shatterer of Worlds loss AND outscore Shatterer of Worlds by 18.82 Shatterer of Worlds needs: -To clinch a playoff spot: 1 win OR (1 loss AND Greenwich Village People doesn't outscore Shatterer of Worlds by 18.82) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Farmer Bernie 0 Posted November 24, 2004 Not good times to lose A.Green and have my other 3 RBs going against the leagues toughest run Ds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gratefulted 14 Posted November 24, 2004 O is still in the running. He just needs help. He needs the winner of the jgalt-ghoo game to lose his other two games, have the ld5er go 1-1 or worse in his other two, and O himself needs to win all three of his games. Not impossible. On week 13 he'll have to come through me I'm sure he's shuddering at the thought Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bigmarc27 24 Posted November 24, 2004 Not good times to lose A.Green and have my other 3 RBs going against the leagues toughest run Ds. If I beat you this week: I need to either beat Torrid or have you lose in your last game. If you win our game this weekend, congrats because its ovah! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gratefulted 14 Posted November 25, 2004 Fock the playoffs! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bigmarc27 24 Posted November 26, 2004 Happy Thanksgiving to me and Rodney. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vikings4ever 538 Posted November 29, 2004 Big playoff implications to the games yet to be decided. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AUKidJoshH 0 Posted November 30, 2004 With Bernie clinching, everyone's now made the playoffs in our league's history. Yay parity! Right now, I'd think points scored is going to come into play between hoo and galt. Not that 19 points is that much to make up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Farmer Bernie 0 Posted November 30, 2004 With Bernie clinching, everyone's now made the playoffs in our league's history. Yay parity! I can't believe I was the last guy to make the playoffs. Oh, well. I'm still :ph34r: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AUKidJoshH 0 Posted November 30, 2004 With Bernie clinching, everyone's now made the playoffs in our league's history. Yay parity! I can't believe I was the last guy to make the playoffs. Oh, well. I'm still :ph34r: It's not entirely your fault. You should have made it the first year, had I not gone on that three-game tear at the end of the season to take the division from you on a tiebreaker. Then again, at 5-8, neither of us should have made it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
torridjoe 48 Posted December 6, 2004 Basically:torrid and Josh have the byes pretty much locked up, grannypoo needs a jgalt loss, jgalt needs a win. do I still have it locked up? Just how many byes are there? I can't tell from your post whether I'm in or out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whoisjgalt 0 Posted December 6, 2004 Basically:torrid and Josh have the byes pretty much locked up, grannypoo needs a jgalt loss, jgalt needs a win. do I still have it locked up? Just how many byes are there? I can't tell from your post whether I'm in or out. You're playing next week unless I come back to beat Wilzone (not likely, given that I'm 45 pts behind and we each have two left) or your Seattle D scores 85 (even less likely). The first tiebreaker is head-to-head and Wilzone beat you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
torridjoe 48 Posted December 6, 2004 Basically:torrid and Josh have the byes pretty much locked up, grannypoo needs a jgalt loss, jgalt needs a win. do I still have it locked up? Just how many byes are there? I can't tell from your post whether I'm in or out. You're playing next week unless I come back to beat Wilzone (not likely, given that I'm 45 pts behind and we each have two left) or your Seattle D scores 85 (even less likely). The first tiebreaker is head-to-head and Wilzone beat you. that's what I thought. Did he mean I had it locked up because there was no way I could lose this week? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bigmarc27 24 Posted December 6, 2004 Basically:torrid and Josh have the byes pretty much locked up, grannypoo needs a jgalt loss, jgalt needs a win. do I still have it locked up? Just how many byes are there? I can't tell from your post whether I'm in or out. You're playing next week unless I come back to beat Wilzone (not likely, given that I'm 45 pts behind and we each have two left) or your Seattle D scores 85 (even less likely). The first tiebreaker is head-to-head and Wilzone beat you. that's what I thought. Did he mean I had it locked up because there was no way I could lose this week? ownage biscuits! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vikings4ever 538 Posted December 6, 2004 Basically:torrid and Josh have the byes pretty much locked up, grannypoo needs a jgalt loss, jgalt needs a win. do I still have it locked up? Just how many byes are there? I can't tell from your post whether I'm in or out. You're playing next week unless I come back to beat Wilzone (not likely, given that I'm 45 pts behind and we each have two left) or your Seattle D scores 85 (even less likely). The first tiebreaker is head-to-head and Wilzone beat you. that's what I thought. Did he mean I had it locked up because there was no way I could lose this week? I really didn't think you would lose. Who knew so many of yoru players would crap out at once? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
torridjoe 48 Posted December 6, 2004 Basically:torrid and Josh have the byes pretty much locked up, grannypoo needs a jgalt loss, jgalt needs a win. do I still have it locked up? Just how many byes are there? I can't tell from your post whether I'm in or out. You're playing next week unless I come back to beat Wilzone (not likely, given that I'm 45 pts behind and we each have two left) or your Seattle D scores 85 (even less likely). The first tiebreaker is head-to-head and Wilzone beat you. that's what I thought. Did he mean I had it locked up because there was no way I could lose this week? I really didn't think you would lose. Who knew so many of yoru players would crap out at once? better this week than next, I suppose (although if I had won this week, I wouldn't need to worry about next week!) Hope it's just an aberration, but you're right--when Deuce and Tiki both crap out, I'm quite vulnerable. I had hoped Staley as RB3 would allow me to go two-deep strong at WR, but it hasn't worked out that way. I could have done without Brian Westbrook going apeshit on me, too. Anyhow, . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites